Editor’s Note: What if you could claim a stake in both OpenAI and Anthropic’s IPOs… with just $200? What if I said you don’t even have to wait for them to go public? Click here to see the details from former IPO insider Jason Bodner — the man who spent nearly two decades helping IPOs go-to-market.

What if everything the mainstream media told you about investing in IPOs is complete, utter nonsense?

What if chasing the biggest names… like OpenAI, and Anthropic… isn’t the best way to profit?

Click here and I’ll show you a hidden way to position yourself for OpenAI and Anthropic’s upcoming IPOs.

It’s an obscure group of companies known as “IPO Multipliers.”

These overlooked companies have historically outperformed the blockbuster IPOs every single time.

Producing gains that can completely transform a portfolio.

Just to give you an idea…

One “IPO Multiplier” I recommended was able to turn his $5,350 stake into a $410,300 retirement nest egg.

I’ve found three of these special companies today…

I’ll tell you more about them in this urgent video.

Of course, gains like this are uncommon, but they demonstrate what’s possible when investors look beyond the headlines.

And get this…

The upcoming wave of AI IPOs is estimated to be worth over $4 trillion…

Making it the biggest tech IPO wave of all time.

So I wouldn’t be surprised if the wins this time around are even bigger.

Click here to get the details on my three favorite IPO Multipliers that could soar in the coming weeks.

Regards,

Jason Bodner
Founder, Outlier Alpha

If you would like to stop receiving these offers, please click here to unsubscribe.

Three Central Banks Hike the Same Week. The Global Tightening Cycle That Was Supposed to Be Over Has Just Restarted.

Written by Evan Brooks · September 13, 2026

The Week of September 15–19, 2026

Three of the world's major central banks are delivering rate decisions in a five-day window: the Federal Reserve on September 16 (90% probability of +25bps, target range to 3.75%–4.00%), the Bank of England on September 18 (expected hold at 3.75%, with November hike priced), and the Bank of Japan on September 17–18 (80% probability of +25bps, rate to 1.25%). The ECB delivered its +25bps hike on September 10, bringing the deposit rate to 2.50%.
At the start of 2026, the consensus across all four jurisdictions expected the next move to be a cut — not a hike. The US market was pricing rate reductions by Q1 2027. The ECB had finished its prior tightening cycle. The BoJ was slowly normalizing from negative rates. The BoE had already begun cutting from its 2023 peak. All four narratives have inverted in the span of roughly six months.
Goldman Sachs Asset Management's September market pulse identified the common driver: the Iran war has pushed energy prices to levels that are feeding into underlying inflation across all major economies simultaneously — not sequentially, as in previous commodity cycles. The energy shock arrived globally and the central bank response is arriving globally in the same week.

Why Synchronized Global Tightening Is Different From Individual Central Bank Decisions

When a single central bank hikes rates, it tightens domestic financial conditions and its effects on global markets are mediated through currency and capital flow channels. When three major central banks hike within five days of each other — with a fourth having moved the prior week — the arithmetic of global financial conditions changes in a way that is qualitatively different from the sum of individual decisions. Global financial conditions tighten simultaneously across USD, EUR, GBP, and JPY-denominated borrowing, which means that companies and governments with multi-currency debt structures face higher rates in multiple funding markets at once. Emerging market economies that borrow in dollars and hold dollar reserves face the full force of US tightening while their domestic economic conditions, trade revenues, and currency dynamics reflect the spillover from all four jurisdictions simultaneously. The T. Rowe Price weekly update noted that the 10-year US Treasury yield rose to 4.97% and the 2-year climbed above 4.63% — a configuration that reflects not just US monetary policy expectations but the global flight-to-quality dynamic that competes with sovereign debt across all the major currency blocs now tightening simultaneously.

The last time this configuration appeared — three or more major central banks hiking in the same narrow window — was the aggressive 2022–2023 tightening cycle that preceded a global growth slowdown and a regional banking stress episode in the US in early 2023. That cycle ended with central banks cutting. The current cycle began, across all four jurisdictions, with cutting — and has reversed into hiking in response to a single supply shock that none of the central banks' models adequately captured. Goldman Sachs Asset Management's overweight equities stance, citing 31% US EPS growth consensus for 2026, provides the counterweight: if corporate earnings are growing fast enough, a synchronized global tightening cycle does not necessarily produce a recession. It produces a multiple compression. The distinction matters enormously for asset allocation, and it is not yet resolved.

Iran bad → oil spikes → you pay more.

Iran deal → oil drops → you "get relief."

Six months later, rinse and repeat.

Think that's an accident?

The same banks advising the White House are trading oil options while the diplomats are still shaking hands.

One man who sat in THOSE rooms — who advised Saudi Arabia AND Kuwait — just went public with the method they use.

Get it before this offer disappears

Ad by Omnia Research

Multiple Compression vs. Recession: Why the Difference Is the Entire Investment Thesis

A synchronized global tightening cycle with strong corporate earnings produces multiple compression: stock prices fall or stagnate as the discount rate rises, but earnings hold up well enough that the underlying business case remains intact and the decline is a valuation reset rather than a growth impairment. A synchronized global tightening cycle that tips one or more major economies into recession produces earnings cuts on top of multiple compression — a double contraction that historically produces peak-to-trough equity declines of 30% to 50% rather than the 10% to 20% that a pure valuation reset implies. Goldman Sachs Asset Management's 31% US EPS growth consensus for 2026 is the number that separates those two scenarios: if it holds, the current sell-off in rate-sensitive equities is a multiple compression event and long-term investors with high earnings-quality holdings should hold through it. If the energy shock and tighter financial conditions feed through to consumer spending and corporate margins in Q3 and Q4, the earnings consensus is the variable that breaks, and the multiple compression becomes something worse.

What Resolves in the Next 30 Days That Determines Which Scenario Arrives

The next thirty days contain the data that determines which scenario is closer. The September 16 FOMC dot plot will show how many additional hikes the Federal Reserve projects — the distance from its June dots to its September dots is the forward rate path in writing. The September 17–18 BoJ decision and Ueda's press conference will show whether the BoJ is committing to an accelerated pace or treating September as a measured step. The September 18 BoE decision, expected to hold, will be accompanied by updated guidance that markets will parse for whether November is a near-certainty or a possibility. The September 30 US PCE print — which Warsh has consistently cited as his preferred inflation measure over CPI — will be the first post-hike inflation reading and the first data point for whether the September 16 hike had any near-term effect on price pressures. Sitting across from all of those scheduled data releases is the one unscheduled variable that has driven every other repricing since May: the Iran conflict. A ceasefire would reverse most of the energy shock, collapse the synchronized tightening rationale in Frankfurt, Washington, and Tokyo simultaneously, and reprice the dot plot that the Fed has not yet published. The central banks are reacting to Brent crude at $107. The bond market is pricing a world in which it stays there. Both are making assumptions about a war that neither can control.

Sources: T. Rowe Price · Goldman Sachs Asset Management · CNBC · Bloomberg · FXStreet · Reuters · Trading Economics · CME FedWatch

[email protected] is on The Raw Capital list because you opted in before the crowd caught on.

If we go quiet — look in promotions, updates, or wherever your inbox files things it hasn't figured out yet.

Unsubscribe. We'll part ways cleanly.

If something's off, you can reach us here

254 Chapman Rd Ste 208 Newark, Delaware 19702.

Privacy Policy