Dear reader,

Most investors run from volatility. The method I have used for the last decade turns it into a weekly paychecks.

Instead of betting on which way the market moves, this strategy harvests income from the swings themselves.

One setup. Once a week. Designed to pay, week after week — without guessing direction or day trading.

[See how volatility becomes cash flow →]

GitLab’s AI Tools Are Starting to Turn Developer Demand Into Real Revenue

Reported by Jeffrey Neal Johnson. Originally Published: 9/5/2026.

Software delivery pipelines are undergoing a fundamental transformation. While consumer-facing artificial intelligence (AI) applications grapple with elevated churn rates, enterprise developer tools are demonstrating their pricing power. GitLab Inc (NASDAQ: GTLB) recently highlighted this divergence by delivering a strong second-quarter fiscal 2027 (FY2027) performance that underscores tangible demand for integrated AI tools.

The software development platform reported a 21.3% increase in quarterly revenue to approximately $286 million, beating Wall Street estimates. Adjusted earnings of 24 cents per share also easily surpassed the 18-cent consensus estimate.

A letter from Shannon Stansberry (Ad)

Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down year in nearly two decades and total gains of almost 2,000% - his immediate reaction was disbelief.

It took a trusted friend's personal vouching for Emmet Savage and a face-to-face trip to Ireland to change his mind. The full documentary, Investigating Project Prophet, is now live.

Watch the full story and see the verified track record for yourself

GitLab’s earnings momentum reveals a broader shift in how development teams consume software. By moving away from rigid constraints and embracing flexible, AI-driven utilization, businesses building continuous integration and deployment pipelines are capturing immediate, verifiable returns on investment. The underlying mechanics driving this top-line acceleration reveal how enterprise software is evolving, shifting the narrative from speculative hype to measurable fundamentals.

Refactoring Revenue: The Pivot to Flex Pricing Pays Off

Historically, enterprise software vendors have relied heavily on seat-based licensing. This model often creates friction for organizations, which may complain about paying for inactive users or struggle to scale access across fragmented teams. GitLab recently made a strategic pivot toward a consumption-based pricing model known as Flex, effectively addressing those longstanding pain points.

During the latest quarter, platform-wide paid consumption run rate exceeded $40 million. This metric highlights a structural tailwind for continued enterprise adoption. When development teams can purchase credits and allocate them dynamically across agentic AI tools such as Duo Enterprise, Duo Pro and the Duo Agent Platform, the barrier to entry drops significantly. Organizations no longer have to commit to expensive, rigid seat licenses for developers who may need advanced code-generation or security-scanning features only intermittently.

The DevSecOps pipeline, which integrates development, security and operations, requires adaptable tools. Unifying these functions within a single interface reduces toolchain complexity and can save engineers countless hours. Net annual recurring revenue growth surpassed 40% in the second quarter, demonstrating that AI monetization in the developer space is verifiable. Customers are willing to pay a premium for tools that measurably increase developer velocity. By integrating artificial intelligence directly into the workflow, rather than forcing developers to toggle between disjointed applications, GitLab is establishing a sticky, high-retention revenue stream that supports its roughly $8.38 billion market capitalization.

Compiling Profits: Why Upward Revisions Matter Now

Top-line growth naturally attracts attention, but sustainable market valuations require a clear path to profitability. Current financials show a trailing net margin of approximately -4.99%. Negative margins can cause hesitation among institutional buyers, especially in a macroeconomic environment that heavily penalizes cash-burning software providers. With enterprise IT budgets under intense scrutiny, demonstrating a direct return on investment is paramount.

To ease these concerns, GitLab management raised its fiscal 2027 adjusted earnings guidance, narrowing its expectations to 85 to 87 cents per share. That range stands in stark contrast to the previous 61-cent Wall Street consensus. The upward revision signals accelerating operating leverage. The market is beginning to price in future cash-flow stabilization, anticipating that aggressive top-line expansion will soon outpace operating expenses.

This forward-looking confidence implies that customer acquisition costs are declining relative to the lifetime value of flexible, usage-based contracts. As the consumption model scales, the incremental cost of delivering AI features could decline, paving the way for margin expansion. Software businesses that successfully cross this threshold can transition from speculative growth plays into mature, cash-generating assets. GitLab currently trades at a price-to-sales ratio of approximately 7.94, a valuation that requires this level of operational maturity to sustain further momentum.

Handling Exceptions: Separating Noise From Reality

Pricing in fundamental growth requires investors to filter out near-term market mechanics. Shares recently rose roughly 10% during regular trading hours, partly propelled by unconfirmed acquisition rumors involving cloud-monitoring leader Datadog Inc. (NASDAQ: DDOG).

The speculation that a large technology company might acquire a leading asset in the software infrastructure layer added an unquantified premium to the stock price. The logic behind the rumor has strategic merit: Integrating observability metrics with a unified code repository could create a formidable end-to-end development ecosystem.

Closing the Tag: Strategic Steps for Software Investors

The developer tools sector is positioned for continued evolution as artificial intelligence moves from an experimental novelty to a more common workflow requirement. Platforms that can successfully monetize these capabilities through flexible, customer-friendly pricing structures are well-positioned to capture outsized market share. The substantial increase in quarterly revenue and upward guidance revision suggest that enterprise demand for integrated developer tools is accelerating.

The transition to a consumption-based pricing model offers fundamental stability that could outweigh near-term merger-and-acquisition noise or speculative trading volatility. While current trailing net margins require ongoing monitoring, projected earnings growth points toward a healthy financial trajectory as operating leverage takes hold.

Investors monitoring the infrastructure software space may want to watch consumption metrics closely in upcoming quarters to confirm that operating leverage continues to materialize. Cautious market participants might prefer to wait for post-earnings volatility to settle and for GitLab to establish a stronger base before initiating a position, while monitoring future enterprise adoption rates.

Cathie Wood Trimmed Palantir, But the Bigger Story Is Still Valuation

Reported by Sam Quirke. Originally Published: 9/9/2026.

When a star investor sells one of the market's most talked-about stocks, it always grabs headlines. That's exactly what happened in early September, when Cathie Wood's ARK funds, known as some of the most bullish voices on high-growth tech stocks, trimmed their stake in Palantir Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: PLTR), one of the hottest names in AI. For nervous shareholders, the obvious question was whether they should follow her out the door.

The short answer is probably not based on that sale alone. Look closely at what ARK actually did, and the sale looks far less dramatic than the headline suggests. This wasn't a wholesale exit but a modest trim amid a broader portfolio rotation—more routine portfolio housekeeping than a vote of no confidence.

A letter from Shannon Stansberry (Ad)

Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down year in nearly two decades and total gains of almost 2,000% - his immediate reaction was disbelief.

It took a trusted friend's personal vouching for Emmet Savage and a face-to-face trip to Ireland to change his mind. The full documentary, Investigating Project Prophet, is now live.

Watch the full story and see the verified track record for yourself

With Palantir shares trading around $170 and holding onto the strong gains that followed last month's earnings report, the real question isn't what one fund did last week, but how much further Palantir's rally could continue.

ARK’s Palantir Sale Looks More Like Rebalancing Than a Warning

First, it helps to understand the context of Wood's move. During the same week, ARK Invest also rotated capital across several other high-growth holdings, adding to some positions while trimming others. Palantir was simply one of several tech holdings the firm reduced, hardly the stuff of a dramatic change of heart.

To put it in perspective, ARK sold around $25 million of Palantir stock—a notable sale, but not a full exit. Trimming a position that has rallied sharply in just a few weeks is one of the most ordinary things a portfolio manager can do. After a stock has climbed as far and as fast as Palantir, taking some money off the table is basic risk management, not a signal that the story has soured.

In short, reading too much into a single week's rebalancing would be a mistake. The far more important question is what lies ahead for the business itself, and here the picture is quite encouraging.

Palantir’s Business Keeps Giving Bulls Ammunition

Beneath the noise, Palantir continues to deliver the kind of growth that explains why the stock has been such a favorite in recent years. August’s earnings report was the latest in a long string of earnings beats, showing U.S. commercial revenue jumping 149% year over year—exactly the sort of momentum bulls want to see. Management also raised its forward guidance, signaling confidence that this pace of expansion can continue.

At the same time, Palantir’s traditional stronghold in government work continues to pay dividends through major contracts. The U.S. Army recently moved the Tactical Intelligence Targeting Access Node program into production, awarding Palantir a $127 million delivery order tied to the AI-enabled system. That reinforces a defense business that remains a formidable and durable moat.

The company has also been forging high-profile partnerships, including with consulting powerhouse PwC and AI infrastructure leader Nebius Group NV (NASDAQ: NBIS). Together, these alliances underline the scale of Palantir's ambitions as it positions itself as the essential operating layer for AI across business and government alike.

The Bear Case Still Starts With Valuation

That said, doubters have a point, and their argument centers on one word: valuation. This issue has haunted Palantir for years, and it's no surprise that the stock trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of around 145. That level leaves very little room for error, and even a modest disappointment in future earnings reports could send the shares tumbling.

Skeptics also question whether Palantir's hands-on, heavily customized approach can scale smoothly as it moves beyond its largest, most sophisticated clients to a broader base of smaller customers. The famed short-seller Michael Burry, for one, has been openly critical of the company, likening it to a high-priced consultant riding a wave of AI enthusiasm.

These are legitimate concerns, and anyone buying at these levels must accept that the stock is priced for continued excellence. A lofty valuation is a double-edged sword: It reflects enormous optimism, but it also raises the bar the company must clear to keep its shareholders happy.

Cathie Wood’s Sale Is Not the Whole Palantir Story

Back to the original question: Should investors follow Cathie Wood in trimming Palantir, or avoid it altogether? Based on the evidence above, the answer is no—not on the strength of her recent selling alone. A small, routine trim that was one of many says very little, especially when considered alongside MarketBeat’s Moderate Buy consensus rating.

That is not to dismiss the risks entirely. The valuation is demanding, and investors should size their positions with volatility in mind. But with commercial growth accelerating, government contracts rolling in and a wave of bullish analyst coverage behind it, Palantir heads into the final months of the year with the wind at its back. One fund's routine rebalancing does little to change that.