Here's what Jim Rogers is saying about gold and silver right now: "Gold and
silver going to the moon." Robert Kiyosaki quoted him on X four days ago.
443,000 people saw it.




Sep 10, 2026 | Browser View
<[link removed]>

<[link removed]>




Сⅼіϲkhеrе and I'll reveal the shocking details.
<[link removed]>

Jim Rogers co-founded the Quantum Fund with George Soros.

He returned 4,200% over 10 years — while the S&P 500 returned 47%.

He's been called one of the greatest investors of all time.

Here's what Jim Rogers is saying about gold and silver right now:

"Gold and silver going to the moon."

Robert Kiyosaki quoted him on X four days ago. 443,000 people saw it.

Then Robert added his own take:

"I am in agreement with my friend Jim Rogers. During this last 'retracement'
or 'crash' I bought more gold and silver."

Two of the most successful investors of the last 50 years.

Both buying gold and silver.

Both saying "to the moon."

Both doing it RIGHT NOW — while silver is down 52% from its highs.

The question is: are you going to listen?

Robert is revealing ONE stock designed to amplify silver's gains 3X to 5X.
<[link removed]>

The name, ticker, and buy-up-to price are inside.

See What They're Buying Into →
<[link removed]>

When legends agree, smart money pays attention.


Six months, roughly 75 attacked vessels, and now a second front in the Red
Sea.



PRESSURE MAP — Deep Focus

Inside the Strait That Refuses to Stay Closed
Six months after nuclear diplomacy collapsed into open war, the Strait of
Hormuz remains only partially navigable, a second front has opened on Saudi
Arabia's Red Sea coast, and the combined effect is a standing tax on global
energy with no clean exit ramp.
The Pressure Point
The Strait of Hormuz, roughly 33 miles wide between Iran and Oman, normally
carries about a quarter of the world's seaborne crude oil and roughly a fifth
of global LNG. Since February 28, 2026 — when the United States and Israel
launched coordinated strikes on Iranian military and nuclear sites, reportedly
killing Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei — Iran's Revolutionary Guard has
intermittently closed the strait to U.S.-linked and allied shipping, laid
mines, and attacked commercial vessels. The U.S. Navy has responded with
blockade enforcement, escort operations, and, as of September 1–2, direct
strikes on Iranian government tankers under a new "tanker for tanker"
retaliation doctrine.
What Changed
This week added two developments. First, the U.S. destroyed five Iranian oil
tankers on September 8 — the largest single tanker strike of the conflict —
after CENTCOM said Iran's IRGC tried twice in 48 hours to target a U.S.
warship. Iran responded with a missile barrage on Jordan's al-Azraq base.
Second, and separately, Houthi forces in Yemen struck Saudi Aramco-linked
energy infrastructure near Jazan, Najran and Abha on the same day, wounding 73
people and threatening the Bab al-Mandeb corridor at the Red Sea's southern
entrance — a truce that had held since 2022. Combined, the two chokepoints that
carry the overwhelming majority of the world's seaborne oil are simultaneously
under active military pressure for the first time in this conflict.
The Official Narrative
Washington's position, per Secretary of State Marco Rubio: "Iran continues to
try to hit US naval ships, and for every time they do that or try to do that,
they're going to lose tankers." CENTCOM says it directed tanker crews to
abandon ship before striking. Iran's Foreign Ministry has called the tanker
strikes a "war crime" and, separately, has made claims — disputed by the U.S. —
of striking American naval assets. Saudi Arabia's coalition spokesman, Maj.
Gen. Turki al-Malki, called the Houthi strikes a "serious escalation" and vowed
retaliation; Houthi spokesman Yahya Saree tied the strikes to Saudi airstrikes
on Yemen.
The Transmission Route
The mechanism runs through insurance, not just physical supply. War-risk hull
premiums for Gulf transits have moved from roughly 0.25% of vessel value before
the conflict to a range of 1% to 5% now — on a $150 million tanker, that is the
difference between roughly $375,000 and $1.5 million to $4.5 million per
transit. Those costs flow through charter rates to cargo owners and, container
lines say, directly to consumers: Hapag-Lloyd has applied a reported
$3,500-per-container Gulf-touching surcharge. Layered on top is the direct
supply channel — roughly 42 tankers reported waiting to transit Hormuz this
week, carrying an estimated 11 million barrels combined, or roughly 11% of
daily global oil demand.
First-Order Exposure
Saudi Arabia's Jazan refining complex, Gulf Arab oil exporters (Kuwait and
Qatar have both previously declared force majeure during this conflict), tanker
owners and their war-risk insurers, and container carriers exposed to
Gulf-touching routes.
Second-Order Exposure
U.S. refiners and airlines exposed to crude and jet-fuel input costs; the
Federal Reserve's inflation calculus, given OECD projections earlier in the
conflict put U.S. inflation roughly 1.2 percentage points above prior
forecasts; Gulf desalination infrastructure serving an estimated 65 million
people, given confirmed oil-spill damage from vessels like the Caroline Bezengi
and Minoan Pioneer; and any American company with Gulf-region supply-chain
dependence.
Who Benefits
U.S. shale producers and LNG exporters gain from a durable Brent premium;
tanker owners with unaffected fleet capacity capture sharply higher charter
rates; reinsurers and war-risk underwriters collect materially higher premiums;
and defense contractors supplying munitions, air-defense systems and naval
assets see sustained procurement demand.
Who Pays
American consumers through pump prices and shipping-driven goods inflation;
Gulf state budgets running production cuts (Iraq's output reportedly fell from
roughly 4.3 million to 1.3 million barrels a day earlier in the conflict, Saudi
Arabia's from 10 million to 8 million); seafarers, roughly 20 killed since
February by independent tallies; and Gulf coastal ecosystems and fisheries
facing pollutant loads researchers say "may retain pollutants for much longer"
than open-ocean spills.
What Remains Unknown
The precise chain of custody on several tanker-strike and mine claims is
contested between the two combatants and cannot be independently verified from
the available record. It is also not established whether the Houthi strikes on
Saudi Arabia were coordinated with Tehran or represent an independent decision
by Yemen's Houthi leadership.
Next Verifiable Checkpoint
Watch whether the Joint War Committee formally expands its "listed area" to
include the wider Bab al-Mandeb corridor in the coming days — that
administrative step would confirm the risk has structurally spread to a second
chokepoint rather than remaining Hormuz-specific.



At Global Risk Axis, we write for people who think for themselves. Nothing
here replaces your own judgment — regulations prevent us from making it
personal, but that was never the point anyway.

Got this forwarded? You can subscribe directly here
<[link removed]>

Need help? Contact us <mailto:[email protected]> for assistance



Unsubscribe
<[link removed]>
— one click, no questions.

Sent to [email protected].

254 Chapman Rd Ste 208 Newark, Delaware 19702




© 2026 Alpha One Marketers LLC. All rights reserved.