View this post on the web at [link removed]

The debunkers are working overtime on the Somali resettlement story, and their favorite gotcha is a technicality: Obama didn’t cut the checks personally. True — and beside the point. His administration did. The State Department’s refugee bureau and Health and Human Services signed the contracts with the nine resettlement NGOs, including the Lutheran agency at the center of this story, and Somali admissions peaked nationally at over 12,000 in fiscal 2016, on his watch. Whether the president signed each grant or a bureaucrat two desks down did, the money came from the same place: us.
And who received it? Not independent charities scraping by on collection plates — nine government contractors, several of them more than 90 percent federally funded, placing arrivals in cities like Minneapolis, which now hosts the largest Somali community in America. Then came the fraud: federal prosecutors convicted dozens in the Feeding Our Future scheme, more than a quarter-billion dollars stolen from a pandemic meal program meant for hungry children. Nick Shirley did what our legacy press would not — he went to the daycares, rolled camera, and asked questions. The video had its flaws. The Senate Homeland Security Committee still called him to testify, because underneath his mistakes sits a fraud case no one disputes.
Now here’s the part that should trouble every American, whatever your politics: we cannot tell you exactly how much federal money flowed to those NGOs for Somali arrivals. The figure circulating online is $108 million. Maybe it’s right. Maybe it’s inflated. Nobody can prove it either way, because neither the agencies nor the NGOs publish refugee funding broken out by nationality. That’s not a conspiracy theory. That is the transparency gap itself — a half-century-old federal program, billions in contracts, and no ledger a citizen can open.
So here’s the ask, and it’s a modest one: itemized, searchable reporting of every resettlement grant. Nationality-level accounting. Open books at the contractors. Audits with clawbacks when fraud is found. If this program is as successful as its defenders insist, they should welcome the sunlight.
Transparency used to be the thing both parties claimed to love. The receipts exist — every grant, every wire, every dollar is filed somewhere. The question is simply who’s allowed to see them. Let’s find out who still means it.

Unsubscribe [link removed]?