Simple 1-hour trading strategy revealed JOLTS just landed. ADP tomorrow.
Friday's payrolls are the one that moves September hike odds.͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌
͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌

Unsubscribe
<[link removed]>

September 1, 2026
View online ↗
<[link removed]>

A note from our friends at Base Camp Trading(ad)
Dear Income Seeker,

If you're struggling to find high-probability income trades...

Or think you've found them...

Only to be frustrated – and disappointed – with the money you're bringing in...

You owe it to yourself to check out this website.
<[link removed]>

Because it will give you the opportunity to get your hands on a little-known
1-hour trading secret... 100% free of charge.

Do your future self a big favor and claim a copy now.
<[link removed]>

Because at some point soon, it won't be free.

Details here.
<[link removed]>

To better trading,

– Drew Day
Partner
Base Camp Trading





Bonus Article
Tesla’s EU Vote Is 35 Days Away. The Data Is Only Half the Battle.



Tesla dropped a data package on Tuesday that it clearly wants regulators to
find difficult to argue with. The company said its supervised self-driving
technology recorded 4.1 times fewer collisions than manually driven Tesla
vehicles across the five European countries where the system is currently
permitted. Those figures come from more than 100 million kilometers of driving
collected between April and August, during which FSD-equipped cars were
involved in three highway collisions and nine off-highway collisions, versus
137 and 490 respectively for manually driven vehicles.

The timing is deliberate. A potential EU-wide approval vote for FSD
(Supervised) is scheduled for October 6, 2026. Tesla is not releasing this data
out of generosity. It is lobbying, in public, with numbers.

Tesla also posted an open-source safety dashboard on its website Tuesday,
which it said had been shared with EU member state regulators in April.
"Leading up to a potential EU-wide approval vote," the company said, "we have
decided to open-source one of the key pieces of evidence used to support the
Netherlands approval."

The path from five countries to twenty-seven is steep. The underlying EU
procedure runs through the European Commission’s committee process, which uses
a qualified-majority threshold of 15 member states representing at least 65% of
the EU population. France has already said it will not authorize FSD
(Supervised) in its current form. Germany is still evaluating. The largest
member states carry enough population weight to shape or stall the outcome. As
long as Germany, France, and Italy prefer to wait, the continent-wide answer
waits with them.

The data itself has drawn scrutiny. Reuters has previously reported that Tesla
presented European regulators with safety statistics that experts said relied
on invalid comparisons and could give a misleading impression of the system's
safety performance. Methodology criticism still applies: comparison baselines
and crash definitions can limit how far the numbers travel. Publishing the
dashboard publicly does not resolve those objections. It just makes them easier
to debate.

For investors, the October 6 vote is less about regulatory process and more
about what Europe means to Tesla's software business. Tesla has reported active
FSD subscriptions rising from 1.28 million in Q1 2026 to 1.48 million in Q2
2026, up from 0.95 million in Q2 2025. But Tesla has not disclosed how many of
those “active” users are paying $99 per month versus using FSD through a
one-time purchase, promotions, or other inclusion. That makes any precise
revenue math more inference than fact. Europe represents a largely untapped
installed base.

An affirmative committee vote on October 6 would be a major step toward
broader EU validity for the Dutch-led approval path. The stakes are asymmetric:
a yes vote could accelerate continent-wide availability; a no vote or deferral
creates extended uncertainty without necessarily canceling current national
permissions.

The data release is a smart move. Publishing numbers regulators already hold,
but making them public, shifts the burden. Now a no vote requires openly
rejecting the evidence rather than quietly shelving it. Whether that changes
the math in Berlin or Paris is the only question that matters before October 6.



DISCLAIMER
This is a paid advertisement for informational and educational purposes only
and does not constitute financial advice. Investing involves risk and may not
be suitable for all individuals. Past performance does not guarantee future
results.
Trading Stocks Now is operated by Investing Media Solutions, LLC. We are not
licensed financial advisors. Always consult with a certified financial
professional before making investment decisions.

IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
Investing Media Solutions, LLC ("IMS"), the owner of this website (the
"Website"), cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information
contained in any article, email, newsletter, or other publication posted on or
viewed in connection with this website (the "Publications"). The author or
authors of those Publications are solely responsible for their contents. IMS
has not done any research or due diligence into the markets, industries, or
companies which may appear or be mentioned in the Publications.IMS will NOT be
liable for any loss or damage caused by a reader's reliance on information
posted on the Website or contained in the Publications.

FOR EDUCATIONAL AND INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY; NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE.
This Website and the Publications are for educational and informational
purposes only. This Website and the Publications do not purport to be a
complete analysis of any company's financial position. This Website, the
Publications or any statements made in the Publications are not, and should not
be construed to be, personalized investment advice directed to or appropriate
for any particular individual.This Website or the statements made in the
Publications should NOT be relied upon for purposes of transacting in any
securities posted on the Website or mentioned in the Publications, nor should
they be construed as a personalized recommendation to you to buy, sell, or hold
any position in any security posted on this Website or mentioned in any
Publications.b>

SUBSTANTIAL RISK IN INVESTMENT.
Any individual who chooses to invest in any securities including those
mentioned in the Publications should do so with caution.Investing or
transacting in securities involves substantial risk; you may lose some, all, or
possibly more than your original investment.Readers bear responsibility for
their own investment research and decisions and should review all investment
decisions with a licensed or registered investment professional.

NOT AN INVESTMENT ADVISOR OR REGISTERED BROKER
Neither IMS nor any of its respective owners or employees are registered or
licensed as a securities broker-dealer, broker, an investment advisor, or an
investment advisor representative with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), any state securities regulatory authority, or any
self-regulatory organization.


For full policies, see our: Disclaimer
<[link removed]> | Privacy
<[link removed]> | Terms
<[link removed]>

Trading Stocks Now
203 N La Salle Street, Suite 2100 | Chicago, IL 60601

unsubscribe
<[link removed]>