In February 2025, a JP Morgan executive named Gregg Smith was sentenced to two
years in federal prison. His crime?



<[link removed]>



Сⅼіϲkhеrе and I'll reveal the shocking details. <[link removed]>



In February 2025, a JP Morgan executive named Gregg Smith was sentenced to
two years in federal prison.

His crime?

For eight years, he manipulated gold and silver prices through "spoofing."

Thousands of fake orders.

Prices driven down.

Then canceled milliseconds later.

The Department of Justice called it "racketeering."

JP Morgan paid $920 million. The largest fine in CFTC history.

And here's the kicker.

They're STILL one of the most powerful players in the gold market. Still
moving mountains of paper every day.

Now look at last Friday.

Gold crashed 17%. Silver dropped 31%.

Right before the crash, the paper-to-physical ratio hit 22-to-1. Silver was
in backwardation — spot prices HIGHER than futures.

The market was screaming: "There's not enough real metal!"

Then came the avalanche of sell orders.

Coincidence?

The Cartel doesn't panic when they're winning. They panic when they're losing
control.

I've identified the one stock at the center of this crisis.

Get The Name & Ticker Here >>>
<[link removed]>

"The Buck Stops Here,"

Dylan Jovine, CEO & Founder

Behind the Markets  



A Supertanker Caught Fire After Hitting Two Naval Mines in the Southern Strait
of Hormuz, per Iranian State Media — the Materialization of the Exact Risk the
US Strikes Sought to Prevent. The Mine Threat Has Moved From Preventable
Preparation to an Actual, Damaging Incident.




The physical threat that had loomed over the Strait of Hormuz became concrete:
a supertanker caught fire after hitting two naval mines in the southern Strait
of Hormuz, according to Iranian state media.This is the materialization of the
exact risk the US strikes had sought to prevent — the mining of the strait —
and it represents a significant escalation of the physical threat to shipping,
transforming the mine danger from a preventable preparation into an actual,
damaging incident that strikes at the heart of the transit the entire
de-escalation had depended upon.




The supertanker incident is deeply significant because it demonstrates that
the mine threat is real and active, not merely a preparation the US could
preempt. The US strikes on Sunday targeted launchers preparing to deploy mines;
the supertanker fire shows that mines have in fact been laid and are damaging
vessels, meaning the physical threat has moved from potential to actual.This
directly undermines the improving-flows narrative that drove last week’s
de-escalation: if supertankers are hitting mines and catching fire, the
recovery of Hormuz transit to two-thirds of pre-war levels is at risk of
reversing, as shipowners and insurers reassess the danger of the passage. The
incident also raises the specter of the broader disruption that active mining
implies: a mined strait is far more dangerous to navigate than one merely
threatened, and the presence of mines could deter the tanker traffic whose
recovery had eased the supply premium, potentially reversing the flow
improvements and re-tightening the physical supply. The supertanker fire is
thus not just a single incident but a signal that the physical security of the
strait has deteriorated sharply, threatening the transit recovery that had
underpinned the lower oil prices.




For the investor, the supertanker incident is concrete evidence that the
physical supply threat has re-intensified, reinforcing the case for energy
hedges and the elevated-oil positioning as the transit recovery comes under
threat. The materialization of the mine danger threatens to reverse the flow
improvements that had driven oil lower, which supports the renewed premium and
the case for maintaining robust energy exposure. The practical read is that the
supertanker fire signals a deterioration in the physical security of the strait
that could re-tighten supply and sustain higher oil prices, warranting the
energy hedges and the recognition that the improving-flows narrative is now at
risk.The disciplined approach is to treat the supertanker incident as concrete
evidence that the physical threat to Hormuz has re-intensified, to hold the
energy exposure that protects against a reversal of the flow recovery, and to
watch whether the mining deters tanker traffic and re-tightens supply — if
shipowners and insurers pull back from the strait, the transit recovery could
reverse and the premium climb further. The mine threat is no longer
hypothetical; position for the physical risk it now poses.




 

Sources — Trading Economics, August 31, 2026 · Bloomberg, August 31, 2026 ·
Congressional Research Service, August 2026




[email protected] is on ObliqueFront.com <[link removed]>
list because you opted in before the crowd caught on.

If we go quiet — look in promotions, updates, or wherever your inbox files
things it hasn't figured out yet.

Privacy Policy <[link removed]>

Unsubscribe
<[link removed]>
. We'll part ways cleanly.

If something's off, you can reach us here <mailto:[email protected]>

© 2026 Alpha One Marketers LLC. All rights reserved.

254 Chapman Rd Ste 208 Newark, Delaware 19702.

<[link removed]>