Hello Friend,
Last week we reported on an incident where
Ms. Melissa Wilson—a high school English teacher at Heritage High
School—had her students take a Diversity Inventory
that asks them to identify their sexual orientation, gender, religion,
socio-economic class, as well of those of their family members,
doctors, etc.
We thought this
incident was shocking on its own, but once we began to research it, we
uncovered something that is going to outrage parents all across the
state.
Earlier this
morning we attended a first-hand meeting with a Wake County
Public School System (WCPSS) Human Resources (HR)
representative and parents who were outraged and demanding action on
behalf of the school regarding the incident. Below we are going to
reveal some of what went on in that meeting, as well as a major
revelation we discovered on—ironically enough—labor day. All
identities have been redacted, as many claimed during that meeting
that they have already been harrassed for initially voicing their
objection to the Diversity Inventory.
In
short, we have discovered that the Wake County Public Schools System's
Equity Affairs office has been conducting training seminars on the
"Social Justice Standards," which is intended to educate and activate students to advance a particular socialist/social
democratic political ideology. These
training seminars are attended to and promoted by everyone from
principals, to teachers, to schools, to entire departments. There are
arguably hundreds of tweets from WCPSS educators discussing these
training seminars, and stating how they are implementing them in
classrooms ranging from elementary science, to high school literature,
to middle school math.
One
teacher even shows a picture of her morning circle of 4th graders,
with a tweet explaining how she is teaching them social justice, while
a new age spiritualist quote sits on the powerpoint in the
background.
This email will
be long, and full of examples of teachers and administrators who—in
their own words—explain how the Equity Affairs office is training them
to implement the Social Justice Standards in their classrooms, as well
as provide statements and photos of them doing this very
thing.
We ask for your
patience given the amount of information we want to share with you,
and that if possible you read this email and review its photos in
full, as its contents will shock you. We'll provide you an outline of
what we discovered, as well as incidents and first-hand witnesses from
this morning's meeting.
I. CHAPTER 1:
TEACHER: MELISSA WILSON
Last week a number of students came home and complained that a
teacher had them conduct a "Diversity Inventory" assignment. Students
were asked to write their name, and then identify the sexuality,
gender, religion, ability, and socio-economic class of their teachers,
fellow students, themselves, their parents, even their doctor.
We learned this morning that it went much further than this.
Students were also asked to stand up, and walk towards posters in
different areas of the room that correlated with their sexual
identities. Students were traumatized. Some were even
brought to tears. At this morning's meeting, one parent said that her
student had been experiencing PTSD from the incident. Another student
didn't attend school on Friday, and is so scared to return to Wilson's
classroom environment that they told their parent they hoped the
hurricane would distract everyone from this incident. Another parent's
child Facetimed them in the middle of the classroom to tell them how
uncomfortable they were with the assignment. Another student had a
friend who had recently shared very private information about
themselves to a select number of their peers, and went white when the
teacher asked students to now stand and reveal their private
identities.
When the students expressed discomfort, the
teacher's response was to tell them it was alright because she used to
be Catholic and is now a bi-sexual atheist.
Let's get
one thing straight: this was not a voluntary
assignment. The students and parents made that clear during
the meeting, and the fact students were asked to stand and publicly
identify their choices confirms it was not voluntary.
Let's also make this clear: this was neither a
one-time offense, nor a single parent's complaint.
In
addition to there being seven angry adults in this morning's HR
meeting, one parent handed us a large stack of printed copies of
emails and messages from other parents complaining about the incident,
but who were too scared to go public with their complaints (for fear
of being called a bigot, being harassed by neighbors, or having their
children face ramifications at school). They had good reason, too. One
of the parents in attendance expressed how after they went public with
their outrage, a teacher commented on their post—during school
hours—and attacked them for complaining about the assignment. The
teacher defended Ms. Wilson, and stated the assignment was a good
thing. Other parents have been messaged on Facebook and called a
bigot. One even had their home vandalized last night.
In
addition to all of these incidents, we also learned that this was not
a once-time incident. Ms. Melissa Wilson apparently has given this
assignment in the past.
And this assignment seems to
be illegal.
According to the 20 U.S.
Code § 1232h.Protection of Pupil Rights, subjection (b)
states:
-
(b)Limits on survey, analysis, or
evaluations No student shall be required, as part of
any applicable program, to
submit to a survey, analysis, or evaluation that
reveals information concerning—
-
(1)political affiliations or beliefs of
the student or
the student’s parent;
-
(2)mental or psychological problems of
the student or
the student’s family;
-
(3)sex behavior or attitudes;
-
(4)illegal, anti-social,
self-incriminating, or demeaning behavior;
-
(5)critical appraisals of other
individuals with whom respondents have close family
relationships;
-
(6)legally recognized privileged or
analogous relationships, such as those of lawyers, physicians, and
ministers;
-
(7)religious practices, affiliations, or
beliefs of the student or student’s parent; or
-
(8)income (other than that required by
law to determine eligibility for participation in a program or for
receiving financial assistance under such program),
-
without the prior consent of the student (if the student is an adult or emancipated
minor), or in the case of an
unem
Miss Wilson's assignment seems to violate the Protection of Pupil
rights subsection
-
(b) (3) on surveying "sex behaviors or attitudes"
where her inventory asks for "sexuality;"
- it seems to violate (b) (5) “Critical appraisals of other
individuals with whom respondents have close family
relationships" where she asks for the identity traits of "my
teacher" "my close friends" and my doctor;
- it seems to violate (b) (6) “Legally recognized privileged or
analogous relationships, such as those of lawyers, physicians, and
ministers," where her inventory asks for the identity traits of
the students doctors;
- it seems to violate (b) (7) “Religious practices,
affiliations, or beliefs of the student or the student’s parent" where it asks for the religion of the
child and their parents;
-
and it seems to violate (b) (8)
“income" where it asks for their socio-economic
status.
The outraged parents asked for the teacher to be placed on
leave, given the fear they had for their children and their current
discomfort. Instead, the HR representative responded that they would
handle this internally. When the parents asked for a timeline in which
they could get an update, the representative refused to give one. This
was in spite of the revelation that the teacher's survey violated the
Protection of Pupil Rights, and inflicted emotional harm and an
invasion of privacy of the students.
And this is when
things get really shocking. Enter the Heritage High School Principal
and WCPSS Communications Director's
response.
II. CHAPTER 2: PRINCIPAL LYONS AND COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR
LUTON
In response to the parental outrage, the WCPSS Communications
Director, Lisa Luten, claimed that the teacher was asked to cease the
activity after internal review. Their statement said: “We will
continue to work with educators on how to effectively lead important
conversations connected to identity, culture, and other sensitive
topics as appropriate.” They claimed that "The Diversity
Inventory worksheet in question is not a district-provided
resource."
The media widely reported—and the
Communications Director's statement inferred—that this seemed like a
rogue and one-time incident. Afterall, the Communications Director
claimed this worksheet is not a district-provided
resource.
However, a letter from Principal Scott Lyons dated
February 20th 2019 addressed Ms. Wilson using a similar assignment in
her 10th grade English class. After outcry from parents, he claims to
have conducted a careful analysis and concludes:
-
“I have carefully conducted a review that included
interviewing and/or gathering information. Additionally, I have
contacted human resources department for guidance on this matter.
The review indicates that the lesson has been used and is
continued to be used at high schools through the district. .
. Additionally, the lesson as a whole may have been best
served if it was used further into the semester when students
and teachers are more comfortable with each other.”
The WCPSS Communications Director's statement seems to infer that
this is not a district-provided resource, however the Principal
acknowledges that not only has this happened with this same teacher
before, but that his research concludes "the lesson has been used and
is continued to be used at high schools throughout the
district."
And this is just the beginning. It gets even
crazier!
III. CHAPTER 3: THE HERITAGE HIGH SCHOOL "SCHOOL
IMPROVEMENT TEAM"
After discovering the
contrasting statements between the communications director claiming
this was not a district activity, and the principal back in February
claiming it was, we were suspicious and began to do some digging. We
discovered that both the principal and Ms. Wilson served on the recent
"School Improvement Team". The goal of the team was as follows:
“Part of the Core Beliefs of the School Improvement Plan is: The
Board of Education, superintendent, and all staff value a diverse
school community that is inviting, respectful, inclusive, flexible,
and supportive.”
The team produced four purposes for
effective practice:
- “Curriculum and instructional alignment”
- “High expectations for all staff and students:"
- "Student support services”
- “Family Engagement”
We discovered that on May 4th, the WCPSS Equity Affairs Office
held a seminar for educators to learn how to disrupt biases
and enact social change. The four effective practices they
focused on were remarkably similar to those stated by the School
Improvement team. A photo of the seminar from an educator reveals this
connection in relation to "disrupting biases" and being part of
"societal change."
This begged the question: what is the WCPSS
Equity Affairs office, what are they training educators to do, and is
there a connection with what Ms. Wilson did in the
class? And it now gets even more
shocking...
IV.
CHAPTER 4: THE WCPSS EQUITY AFFAIRS OFFICE
Within the WCPSS is an office for Equity Affairs. It
states as its mission "to help teachers and schools educate
children and youth to be active participants in a diverse
democracy." It goes about this mission by "teaching
tolerance," "provid[ing] free resources to teachers . . . to
supplement the curriculum, to inform their practices, and to create
civil and inclusive school communities" Furthermore, "Our
Social Justice Standards show how anti-bias education works through
the four domains of identity, diversity, justice and action."
The WCPSS Equity Affairs office conducts events all over
the district that train teachers to implement the "Social Justice
Standards" within their classrooms—regardless of the grade or subject
being taught.
So what is the "Social Justice
Standards"?
The Social Justice Standards is a framework of four
anchors that teach 20 standards. The four anchors are:
- Identity
- Diversity
- Justice
- Action
There are plenty of tweets from teachers and administrators from
packed rooms where the Equity Affairs office conducts training
seminars where you can see the Social Justice Standards anchors on
presentations. They also hand out copies of the red Social Justice
Standards. These events are promoted and liked on twitter by
educators, departments, official school and district accounts, etc.
Here are two examples of them promoting their Social Justice Standards
training for September 7th, and a teacher showing her distributed
Social Justice Standards red document and stating she was "learning
how to implement [it] into my curriculum."
So besides the framework, why does the Social Justice
Standards exist and what does it teach? The four anchors are designed
with the following purpose stated on Tolerance.org's Social Justice
Standards website:
- “Students will develop positive social identities
based on their membership in multiple groups in society. Students will
develop language and historical and cultural knowledge that affirm and
accurately describe their membership in multiple identity groups.
Students will recognize that people’s multiple identities interact and
create unique and complex individuals. Students will express pride,
confidence and healthy self-esteem without denying the value and
dignity of other people. Students will recognize traits of the
dominant culture, their home culture and other cultures and understand
how they negotiate their own identity in multiple spaces.”
The framework accomplishes this goal by training teachers to
insert lessons into their curriculum that teach the four anchors and
the 20 standards.
It isn't a surprise that several of
the sample modules in the Social Justice Standards are almost
identical to the lesson Ms. Wilson performed in her class that
outraged parents and robbed kids of their privacy.
For
example, the identity anchor contains a lesson that asks students to
identify the gender, ethnicity, race, religion, socioeconomic states,
and sexual orientation of different photographed individuals. A second
module asks them to identify their own, and whether they are visible
or invisible (and why). This seems to directly parallel Ms. Wilson and
others Diversity Inventory. However, even the module of looking at
photos of students and identifying their identity has parallels. One
parent revealed to us that during a class, the teacher pointed at a
student and claimed because she was a white female, she was likely to
be able to afford lunch. Regardless of how inappropriate this was, it
reflects the Social Justice Standards module of identifying the
identities of the photographed individuals, however the teacher opted
to out a students as a live demonstration instead of using the
photos.
Here are some photos from the Social Justice Standards
achor 1 identity module, and you can see the parallel with the
Diversity Inventory document assignment Miss Wilson handed out.
Apparently Miss Wilson seems to simply be implementing the Social
Justice Standards via her Diversity Inventory:
Here are further examples of modules/lessons:
-
- Identity Anchor
- A module on identifying identities from
profile photos
- A module on identifying one's own invisible and
visible identities
- Diversity Anchor
- A module on examining and creating LGBT-safe spaces
and inclusive school environments
- Justice Anchor
- A module on positively appraising Cesar
Chavez and labor movements
- A module on rating your privilege,
where the most privilege points are awarded to white males, and
individuals in welcoming families
- Action Anchor
- A module encouraging girls to read Six-to
Twelve-Year-Olds Talk about Gays and Lesbians
- A module on getting students to talk to a
group of little children about social
justice
- A module positively examining labor movement
boycotts
The WCPSS Equity Affairs office conducts trainings on
implementing the Social Justice Standards and these four anchors all
across the district. The past year evidences training seminars across
schools and departments. Teachers and principals even actively promote
the events, recruit fellow teachers and administrators, and share how
they plan on implementing the Social Justice Standards training in
their elementary, middle, high school, english, science, and even math
classes. Here are some of their own public tweets showing the training
and explaining how they will use them in their own words.
A tweet from a principal at Rolesville
Middle School recruiting teachers to attend the WCPSS Equity Affairs
Social Justice Standards training session on September
7th
Collaborative events between Equity
Affairs and Safe Schools NC teach educators in public
facilities
Teachers are encouraged to not use
pronouns and avoid “micro aggressions;" instead use "scholars"
"authors." On discussing LGBT+ identities of famous scientists, one
presentation encourages them "don't shy away from
it!"
Teacher Liu Laoshi is trained on the
Social Justice implementations, and she states “Social justice is a
process that I should start from my own classroom”
Wake Forest Elementary School's science
department promoted and encouraged educators to adopt culturally
responsive science teaching that utilizes "sociopolitical
consciousness"
Teacher Supriya V teaches a circle of
4th graders about “discussing the relation b/w social justice” during
her morning circle with her kids. A new age spiritualist named Eckhart
Tolle's quote sits in the background on the screen.
The list goes on an on, and anyone can read the hundreds
of tweets here from educators on how they are implementing the
Social Justice Standards WCPSS Equity Affairs training in their
classrooms.
V. CHAPTER 5: THE REMAINING QUESTION;
ROGUE TEACHER OR DISTRICT WIDE ISSUE?
I think most every parent can agree that it is wrong to invade a
child's privacy, and it is especially wrong for educators to use their
positions and their captive student audiences to proselytize either
their faith or their political ideology. The Social Justice Standards
four anchors and their sampled module activities quickly reveal the
attempt to disciple children to adopt and act upon a very specific
social democratic political ideology. This is not only clear in
the sample module lessons the Standards—and the WCPSS Equity Office
who trains teachers to use it—give in appraising labor organizing,
identity politics, and helping students identify their privilege. But
it is especially evident in anchor four, which focuses on getting the
students to organize for "collective action." Number 20 of the
standards within this anchor states as its goal to get students to
"plan and carry out collective action
against bias and injustice in the world and will evaluate what
strategies are most effective." This
"collective action" is a hallmark of the
socialist/social democratic ideology, and the tolerance.org website
even contains a database that is filterable by grade level, taught
subject, and anchor category to find lesson plans to teach students
collective action on everything from challenging the Judeo Christian
academic calendar, to using their social media profiles to advocate
for a particular and ideologically-specific understanding of social
justice. In
short, these connected dots show that the WCPSS's Equity Affairs
office is actively training educators across the district to implement
social justice into their curriculum. Two of the modules of sample
lessons in the identity anchor were likely used by Miss Wilson in her
Heritage High School English class. She may even have gotten them from
the district's Equity Affairs office...We're suspicious that the Diversity Inventory
may be one of the items distributed at these Equity Affairs Social
Justice Statement training seminars. At the very least, both of the
examples given in her class, and the document itself, seem to directly
reflect the sample lessons and spirit in the Social Justice Standards
document that Equity Affairs distributes and trains teachers to
implement. We have even seen messages from other parents stating other
teachers have used this same document at Heritage High
School, and in February earlier this year, the
Heritage High School principal stated that after his research he
discovered the lesson was used across the district, and that his
problem with it was that it should have
occurred later in the semester. In his own words.
In
closing, this doesn't at all seem to be a rogue teacher incident. This
has occurred in the past from the same teacher, parents claim other
teachers in the department have used it, the principal claims it was
used throughout the district, and the district's official WCPSS Equity
Affairs office is actively training educators to implement the Social
Justice Standards into their curriculum (and with it, sample lessons
that are nearly identical to the Diversity Inventory that invaded
these children's privacies). We now must find out
whether Miss Wilson attended a WCPSS Equity Affairs Social Justice
Training seminar, whether she received this document at a seminar,
what other teachers in the district have used it or are using it, what
other anchor lessons they are implementing to advance the social
justice ideology into their curriculum, and just how widespread this
problem is.
Whether you want to teach your child to
be Christian, or a social democrat, or even a communist, it is your
family's private business. Families and churches are charged with
teaching these values; not public school (because they are public and
need to maintain a neutrality and respect of privacy). When public
schools try to radicalize youth or abuse their teaching
responsibilities, it leads to emotional wounds like those experienced
and voiced by the impacted students. It is not the business of the
state through public education to do it for you; and that's exactly
what is happening when teachers are trained to modify their
curriculums to train their students to learn and act on social justice
( whereas that time should actually be spent teaching them English,
Math, and Science; the things taxpayers are paying for their kids to
be taught).
Tami Fitzgerald NC Values Coalition Executive Director
|