View this post on the web at [link removed]

Bridgeport should be a bridge to a brighter day for the people who live here — not simply the next affordable stop from New York.
Thanks for reading The Goldstein Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
I just saw a realtor post asking:
“Why are people moving to Bridgeport, CT?”
The pitch was waterfront views, beaches, food, entertainment and easy train access to New York City. The post also noted that more buyers moving from NYC are adding Bridgeport to their home searches.
And it upset me.
Not because I have anything against the realtor. And certainly not because I don’t want people moving to Bridgeport.
I want people investing in Bridgeport. I want businesses opening here. I want property values rising. I want people to look at Bridgeport and see tremendous opportunity.
What upset me was what that post unintentionally represents.
After decades of one-party government, are we finally going to declare Bridgeport a success because people from New York discover they can afford to live here?
What about the people who are already here?
Affordable to whom?
Bridgeport families have been waiting for their brighter day.
Waiting for better schools.
Waiting for safer streets.
Waiting for better-paying jobs.
Waiting for pathways to homeownership.
Waiting for government to deliver.
Now housing costs are already squeezing the people who stayed. DataHaven’s 2025 Bridgeport Equity Report found 54% of Bridgeport renter households were housing-cost burdened, while the state comptroller reported 58.7% for renters across the Greater Bridgeport planning area.
And just this week, two new residential projects were approved near Park Avenue without designated affordable units.
Development isn’t the enemy.
Displacement is.
Don’t force people out. Give them a way up.
We shouldn’t have to choose between a declining Bridgeport and a revitalized Bridgeport that its existing residents can no longer afford.
There is a third choice:
Build a Bridgeport where the people who are here participate in its success.
That means:
Renting → Earning → Saving → Owning.
It means:
Better schools and real educational choices.
College for the students who want college and skilled trades for those who want another path.
Attracting employers so that Bridgeport isn’t merely someplace to sleep before catching a train to somebody else’s economy.
Creating pathways to homeownership, including affordable owned homes and apartments, so rising property values create generational wealth for Bridgeport families instead of becoming an eviction notice.
Interestingly, Bridgeport’s own Affordable Housing Plan says housing policy should provide options not merely for people coming to Bridgeport, but for those who want to stay, particularly young people.
That’s the Bridgeport I want to fight for.
A Bridge to a Brighter Day
Bridgeport isn’t New York City.
And it shouldn’t aspire to become somebody else’s commuter town.
Its name tells us what it can be:
A BRIDGE to a brighter day.
A PORT of opportunity for every child.
A place where your ZIP code doesn’t determine your future.
Welcome the new family arriving from New York.
Welcome the entrepreneur opening a business.
Welcome the developer willing to invest.
But never abandon the people who were here first.
I understand why people are frustrated.
I’m here to turn that frustration into action.
And instead of asking, “Why are people moving to Bridgeport?”
I want us asking:
“How do we make sure the people of Bridgeport can afford to stay, prosper, and own a piece of its future?”
Michael Goldstein for Congress
People Over Parties.
Put a Doctor in the House.
Paid for by Michael Goldstein for Congress.
Thanks for reading The Goldstein Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Unsubscribe [link removed]?