Dear Supporter,
New paper reveals how 'job creation' projects destroy jobs
Too often, our politicians fall into the trap of thinking they can
create jobs by piling on more and more government taxpayer spending. But if that were
true, high-spending countries like Greece and Spain wouldn't be facing
a decades-long employment crisis.
The Taxpayers' Union's latest
briefing paper reveals how Government spending – including
projects intended to create jobs – destroys productivity and
employment.
We draw on work from Treasury and New Zealand economists estimating
the 'deadweight loss' of our tax
system – this is the way
taxation motivates people to work less, and spend and invest less,
leading to economic distortions. Applying it to some recently
announced pet projects is sobering:
Because government spending projects are funded via taxation, we
can use what economists call the "deadweight loss" to see how many
jobs are killed by handouts such as James Shaw's $11.7 million grant
to a "Green School".
Click
here to read the paper.
While it's true that economic stimulus is needed in the era
of COVID-19, this needn't come in the form of giant cheques. Leaving
this money in the economy via lower tax rates will allow money to
circulate in a way that creates jobs passively, without costly
perverse incentives.
Taxpayers rorted by Labour MP's electorate
office deal
The cozy deal between list MP Ginny
Anderson (pictured above with the Debt Monster), the Labour Party, and
the NZ Professional Firefighters Union is a rort on
taxpayers.
As
Stuff explains, Labour gets cheap rent on office space off
a local union, sublets the rooms to Andersen, and then bills
parliament (i.e. taxpayers) at a markup, pocketing the
difference.
Taxpayer funding for offices is meant to cover the costs
of being an MP and servicing constituents. Here, Ginny Anderson has
abused that trust to line the pockets of her political party.
This sort of union backhander is what we’d expect to see
in the corrupt unions of Australia. Here in New Zealand, we expect
such favours to be disclosed as donations, so why weren't they?
With the discounted rent not being disclosed as
a political donation, we've referred the matter to the Electoral
Commission. We're also writing to every other MP to
ensure they're not funneling their office funding to political mates
or their business interests.
"Green School" handout shows dangerous trend of horse-trading over
funds
It's been revealed that James Shaw put
billions of dollars in infrastructure funding on the line in order to
negotiate his $11.7 million handout for a private "Green School".
This is a perfect example of a worrying
trend in the way the Government makes funding decisions. Here's what
Jordan had to say:
The spectacle of
politicians horse-trading individual funding decisions is something we
expect to see in smoke-filled rooms of yesteryear, not a modern day
New Zealand with a reputation of being corruption-free.
The Provincial
Growth Fund, and now the COVID ‘shovel ready’ fund, are normalising a
process of decision making that rewards companies which are
politically connected. It is a dangerous path.
Steven Joyce
reintroduced the sort of corporate welfare largess not seen in New
Zealand since the Muldoon Government. But instead of fixing the
problem, the current Government has doubled down and we have now
returned to politicians making funding decisions for individual
projects and pet causes.
Enough is enough.
Now we are seeing the warts and all flaws in the process, New
Zealand should return to a transparent process of the politician’s job
being limited to setting criteria and objectives, and leaving it to
officials to make the individual grant decisions.
State Services Commissioner responds to our complaint
regarding the Ardern-Bloomfield ad
Remember the Labour Party's ad featuring Dr Ashley
Bloomfield and other public servants? We complained to the State
Services Commissioner that it was an improper use of taxpayer-funded
staff.
Now, the
Commissioner has responded:
It would not be appropriate for a
public servant to agree to feature in party political electoral
material in their official capacity where this implies endorsement by
the public servant of the political party. To do so would compromise
their political neutrality and by implication that of the Public
Service as a whole. ... Placing footage of Ministers
and public servants doing their official work on a political party
branded platform could create confusion about the motivations
and political neutrality of the public servants
concerned. ... In this instance, and having regard to all the
circumstances, my judgement is that on balance there is
potential for questions to be raised regarding the participation of
the public servants in the video.
The Commissioner isn't taking further action (the video has already
been removed) but at least he's has sent the message to bureaucrats
that it is totally inappropriate for public servants to feature in a
party political advert. Taxpayers pay public servants to do
their jobs, not to aid their political masters in re-election
campaigns.
The Commissioner also said, “I understand that none of the
public servants involved were aware that the footage would be used in
the way that it was.”
Based on this, it appears there has been a clear breach of the
Cabinet Manual, which states ‘Ministers must uphold the political
neutrality of the public service and not ask officials to act in any
way which would conflict with their obligation of
neutrality.’ But enforcement of the integrity of the Manual is
ultimately up to the Prime Minister. Some would say that’s a case of
the fox guarding the henhouse!
Revealed: Taxpayer-funded ‘wellbeing’ goodie bags
during lockdown
Our research team recently
revealed that the NZ Super Fund spent over $15,000 on “COVID-19
well-being parcels” from designer supermarket Farro Fresh for its
highly-paid staff over lockdown.
According to NZSF, the parcels included ‘sundry goods’ such as
coffee and hot cross buns.
Forty-five of the Super Fund's staff are paid more than
$300,000. Pretty much everyone else is paid more than $100,000. As I
told the Herald,
these people do not need care packages paid for by taxpayers who are
going without during COVID-19 lockdown.
The Taxpayers’ Union requested the credit card statements
of the NZSF from the 1st of March 2020 – 31 May 2020 under the
Official Information Act. In addition to the goodie bags, other
interesting payments included:
-
Inspired Accountants team building trip for corporate strategy team
for $1359.90 paid for during Level 3 lockdown.
-
A canoe hire for $794.00.
-
Hand sanitiser for $568.80.
-
Renewal of a practicing certificate with the NZ Psychologists Board
for $550.85.
-
A 10-year anniversary gift for a staff member for $515.
-
Lunch at White & Wongs for $156 the day it was announced New
Zealand would enter Level 4 lockdown.
-
“Motivation morning tea” before working from home for the
investments team, for $107.61.
Have a great week,
|
Louis
Houlbrooke Campaigns Manager New Zealand Taxpayers'
Union
|
|