A bonus FOUR things FRIDAY!
<[link removed]>
Hi Friend,

 

I could come up with a reason. I could come up with an excuse. 


I have none. 


So guess what? In place of Three Things Thursday, you get a bonus Thing for a
Four Things Friday:

Naked Partisanship.
<[link removed]>

Politicians shouldn’t choose their voters. Period. Whether it’s Republicans or
Democrats, when you have self-interested legislators drawing maps that concern
their own jobs, odds are they’re going to draw maps that favor them, not maps
that favor voters. In Virginia this year, citizens have the chance to reform
the process for their state so that voters — not politicians — come first. 


When Democrats in Virginia were in the minority, they supported redistricting
reform that would give citizens a say in how their maps are drawn. But in 2020,
following a landmark election that saw Democrats take control of the House and
the Senate, suddenly the Democrats were singing a different tune…


This week, check out an editorial from the Washington Post
<[link removed]>
, who spend no time mincing their words to tell readers what’s really going on
in Virginia. “In a poll last December, nearly three-quarters of registered
voters surveyed said they backed the new system as described in the
constitutional amendment,” they write. “They are likely to see the Democratic
Party’s newfound antipathy to reform for what it is: naked partisanship.”



<[link removed]>

<[link removed]>
When the majority of voters voted for someone else.
<[link removed]>

As often happens in our election system, the crowded race for Massachusetts'
fourth congressional district is a nail-biter between a few candidates atop a
nine candidate field. The race to determine who represents voters in Congress
could be decided by tenths of a percentage point. Yet in a field of six
candidates, thetwo candidates currently leading the vote tally
<[link removed]>
represent just a fraction of the voters overall. How is it, then, that we can
call ourselves a representative democracy?


We can’t, really. Voter preference is so often left behind in our Republic, as
the majority of voters are ignored in the final vote tallies in crowded primary
elections. Butranked choice voting
<[link removed]> could change that.
RCV would allow voters to express their full range of opinions on a field of
candidates, rather than voting for whom they find most stomachable. 


This could be the last time Massachusetts has to face these problems; there is
a ballot initiative this November that would institute ranked choice voting
across the state on all elections —meaning that next time, when a politician
says he earned the vote of his constituents, he can actually mean it. 



<[link removed]>

<[link removed]>
What happens with an illegitimate election?
<[link removed]>

In your #longread for the week, David Litt for The Atlantic
<[link removed]>
breaks down what a truly illegitimate election might look like this November.
This is bigger than just a question of whether the president will actually
leave office: as the president works to sow doubt about the integrity of our
elections, he breaks down the trust American have in the results and in the
process. 


It’s setting up to be a nightmare scenario. With the looming threats from
President Trump, combined with the expected second-wind “blue wave
<[link removed]>
” caused bydelays in counting absentee ballots
<[link removed]>
, no one knows quite what to expect in November.  

I don’t have the answers but here’s what I do know: election results will not
be available on election night, as states continue to count absentee ballots
into later weeks. The best thing Americans can do is prepare themselves for a
long wait before hitting the panic button.



<[link removed]>

<[link removed]>
Finally: find common ground.
<[link removed]>

As we leave into this long weekend, I’ll leave you on a positive note from
Unite America team member Emily Baller
<[link removed]>. Much of the
time — hell, even in this email — we focus our energy on the space between us.
Instead of unity, our default is to look at dysfunction. A new report from the
University of Maryland dares to ask “Why?”.


Part of the problem, they find, is with the way in which pollsters ask
questions. When you ask respondents a simple yes or no question, their answers,
it turns out, will be a lot more simple. They do agree or they don’t agree. The
divide between Americans looks expansive. 


But as researchers pointed out, when they engaged with respondents in a
meaningful, though conversational, discussion on the various policy issues,
they found that a lot more unites us than divides us. They found over 150 areas
in which Americans had overlapping views, suggesting that we may be closer to
unity than we think. 



<[link removed]>

<[link removed]>
Enjoy the weekend. 

 

Brett
__
Brett Maney
Senior Communications Manager
Unite America
DONATE <[link removed]>


Want to stop receiving our weekly Three Things Thursday emails? Unsubscribe
<[link removed]>
 from Three Things Thursday, or Unsubscribe
<[link removed]>
from all Unite America communications.

Unite America | 1580 Lincoln St Suite #520 Denver, CO 80218
Paid for by Unite America.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.
www.uniteamerica.org <[link removed]>