The public wants a better Court. Politicians are listening. ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

[link removed]

An “ideas primary” is underway. What will be the next generation of reform?

Last week, House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries told

[link removed]

the National Association of Black Journalists that “dramatic Supreme Court reform is necessary.”

His words rumbled loudly throughout political circles. One reason is the growing expectation that Democrats will likely win at least one house of Congress next year. Nate Silver

[link removed]

puts the odds at 87 percent, and the Polymarket

[link removed]

betting, oops, “prediction” market says 88 percent. These are just forecasts, of course. (Remember President Hillary Clinton?)

But voters often form firm views months before Election Day. In 2026, citizens want to shake things up. Jeffries’s embrace of Court reform is more than just speechifying. It recognizes that our democracy needs repair and that the branch of government that gutted voting rights, ushered in unlimited money in politics, and greenlit gerrymandering must be part of the solution.

What would such reform look like? Jeffries told NBC’s Meet the Press that Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), now ranking member on the House Judiciary Committee, would take the lead in sorting out options. This comes as Rep. Joe Morelle (D-NY) oversees a broader effort focused on tackling corruption in all three branches of government, including reforms at the Court.

We have argued that term limits

[link removed]

, set by statute with justices transitioning to senior status after 18 years, are the best workable reform to bring the Supreme Court into alignment with the country it serves. It could help cure the collapse of public trust in the high court, now at the lowest level ever recorded. A guarantee of a nomination every two years could drain poison from the confirmation process.

One version, introduced by Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA), now has 85 cosponsors. Momentum is growing within Congress. After the egregious Louisiana v. Callais decision finally interring the Voting Rights Act, the Congressional Black Caucus declared

[link removed]

it “our mission to aggressively advance Supreme Court reform. We will work to establish term limits for justices to help restore independence, neutrality, and legitimacy to the Court.”

Never lose sight of this fact: Supreme Court term limits have wide popular support

[link removed]

. The most recent Fox News poll shows 78 percent support, a finding confirmed by the Brennan Center in our own polling. That’s lots of Republicans and independents as well as Democrats. Few issues garner as much enthusiasm. Far from a fringe idea, term limits are already at the center of the mainstream.

It’s a time of ferment. Raskin, for example, has suggested adding seats so that each judicial circuit throughout the country is represented. Congress indeed has the power to expand the Court, as it has done other times throughout history. Expansion would offer an immediate reset. It has far less public support, though, and could produce a retaliatory spiral, with Republican and Democratic presidents each adding new justices. Even President Franklin D. Roosevelt, at the height of his power, with the justices poised to strike down Social Security and the rest of the New Deal, ran up against a fierce public backlash.

At the Brennan Center, we’ve published Six Solutions to Fix the Supreme Court

[link removed]

. They include a binding ethics code and a fast track for Congress to respond to unwise rulings, as well as a reining in of “shadow docket” abuse and other needed reforms. It’s part of our series, Solutions for a Stronger Democracy

[link removed]

.

Lawmakers should be creative, but not waste time. President Trump would not sign any court reform passed by a Democratic Congress. But that should not deter action. Often legislation germinating in one congressional term becomes the early agenda in the next. When President Bill Clinton entered office, for example, Congress quickly passed and he signed the National Voter Registration Act

[link removed]

and the Family and Medical Leave Act

[link removed]

. Both bills had been vetoed by his predecessor, President George H.W. Bush.

Those who might seek to be president must weigh in, too. Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, and others have called to expand the Court. Josh Shapiro demands “radical” reform. Late in his time in office, President Joe Biden endorsed term limits, placing it squarely in the mainstream. Vice President JD Vance, for his part, veers between defending and attacking the Court. When he was a senator, Marco Rubio proposed a constitutional amendment to cap the number of justices at nine. And Tucker Carlson has denounced Court expansion as “radicalism.” (But I digress.)

Public support for term limits derives not only from anger over rulings such as Dobbs overturning Roe v. Wade, or Citizens United. It flows from a core sense of democratic accountability: Nobody should have too much power for too long. It is emphatically proper for the role and tenure of the Court to be at the center of political debate.

Term limits would ensure

[link removed]

that judges “would not lose all touch with reality through decades of ivory tower existence.” That’s what John Roberts said long before he joined the Court. Wise words.





Police Surveillance Tech

New reporting finds that law enforcement is abusing Flock’s automatic license plate readers. The company’s broad national network of cameras can be used to track anyone, often with little documentation or oversight. Officers have misused the technology for personal purposes and to target Americans exercising their constitutional right to speak out and protest. Rachel Levinson-Waldman urges police departments to adopt safeguards, such as requiring warrants to search historical data and maintaining and regularly auditing search logs. Read more

[link removed]

The Polling Predicament

Fake polls are on the rise, as are politicized attacks on legitimate polls. “Polling is an important tool for understanding public opinion, but it is becoming harder for voters to distinguish credible polling from attempts to manufacture consensus,” Caitlin Dukovich and University of Washington’s Zarine Kharazian examine the changing polling landscape and offer three questions voters can ask to assess whether a poll is trustworthy. Read more

[link removed]

Can States and Cities Say No to ICE?

Most Americans disapprove of how ICE is doing its job, and many don’t want their state and local officials to cooperate with federal immigration authorities. The Trump administration has argued that such cooperation is mandatory, but states and localities generally have the authority to decide whether and how their officials work with ICE. A new Brennan Center explainer breaks down the legal questions surrounding those decisions. Read more

[link removed]





Podcast

How Will AI Affect the Midterms?

[link removed]

For a new Brennan Center study, a team of technology experts examined how popular chatbots responded to prompts related to election conspiracy theories. The results were mixed: Chatbots often pushed back against false information, but they were also skilled at creating false images and disinformation. Watch or listen on YouTube

[link removed]

// Spotify

[link removed]

// Apple

[link removed]

// SUBSTACK

[link removed]





News

Sean Morales-Doyle on the administration’s attempts to undermine trust in elections // MS NOW

[link removed]

Joseph Nunn on the dangers of using the military for policing // NPR

[link removed]

Wendy Weiser on keeping elections secure and accessible // WABE

[link removed]

Feedback on this newsletter? Email us at [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]







[link removed]

Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law

120 Broadway, Suite 1750, New York, NY 10271

646-292-8310

tel:646-292-8310

[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Support the Brennan Center

[link removed]

View Online

[link removed]

Want to change how you receive these emails or unsubscribe? Click here

[link removed]

to update your preferences.

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]