Unsanitized: The COVID-19 Report for Sept. 4, 2020
Republicans Working on
the Least They Can Possibly Do Plus, the politicization of vaccines
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) is throwing a last-minute wrench into Senate Republicans' coronavirus relief gambit. (Alex Brandon/AP Photo)
First Response
The second-to-last jobs report before the election would sound really great if you were airlifted in from the International Space Station after a year of isolation. The economy added 1.37 million jobs and dropped the topline unemployment rate to 8.4 percent. This is down from 1.7 million added in July, and remains 11.5 million jobs under the number in February, a 7.5 percent loss since the beginning of the pandemic. Permanent job loss is actually falling
more quickly than it did during the Great Recession, at 3.4 million. In all 19 million workers are either unemployed or have lost their jobs, based on this report. And it includes 237,000 Census hires, who will lose their jobs shortly.
The report is indicative of a country where the rich have completely cleaved themselves off from the rest of society. As Tim
Noah writes, the prediction that we were living in a plutonomy, a nation of, by, and for the 1 percent, has now come to pass. You can have an economy without caring about the welfare of an exceedingly large section of the population, if you just shut your eyes. Food bank participation and the stock market are nearing record highs, simultaneously. Threat of eviction and rental debt has never been this elevated, and neither have bank profits from investments and trading. You either have it or you don’t.
So expecting a bunch of haves in the Senate Republican caucus to figure out how to prevent disaster for the have-nots might be a foolish enterprise. Senate Republicans can enable a Federal Reserve bailout (“The
Fed created a bubble where life could go on—not unlike the NBA bubble,” is one great quote from that above-linked Wall Street Journal piece), but helping invisible people they never come into contact with in a typical day? Come on, they’re not miracle workers!
So it’s not surprising, then, that Senate Republicans can’t decide on what to do, or whether to do anything, about the continuing economic crisis. Mitch McConnell first announced a $1 trillion legislative effort, mostly as a coat rack for his scheme to give a liability release to corporations, hospitals, and schools for wrongful infections or deaths from COVID-19. That split the caucus almost in half.
McConnell has come back with something about half the size. There’s a $300 a week federal unemployment enhancement, down from the $600/week that expired in July. There’s a round of small business Paycheck Protection Program funding. There’s the $105 billion for schools, and there’s the conversion of an existing $10 billion line of credit for the Postal Service into a
grant. (That’s only in there to make this bill line up with the measure House Democrats passed that was only about the Postal Service. It’s an attempt to limit the negotiation.) And of course, there’s that liability release.
Of course Chuck Schumer is
outraged by the Senate GOP’s offer getting smaller, not bigger, as time goes on. And the lack of funding for state and local government (Los Angeles just announced the furlough of 15,000 city jobs), stimulus checks, rental assistance, and food assistance—those things the “other” Americans need—makes this wholly inadequate.
What McConnell wants to do is find something his entire caucus can agree on, or at least the majority of the Senate (so 50 of his 53 members), to make that the right pole in the negotiation. But that has now been threatened. Some Republicans are seeing this desire to find common ground as an opportunity to layer on unrelated ideological demands.
Sen. Ted
Cruz (R-TX) is pushing to add a $5 billion provision for private school vouchers to the relief bill. Few actually want this as part of the overall package, rightly reasoning that it has nothing to do with coronavirus relief. But you just need a handful of splitters—four to be exact—to derail the
entire enterprise. The bill is supposed to get a vote next week, when the Senate returns to session.
One of the objections is that Cruz’ tax credit shouldn’t get in while others get out. You can imagine the mollifying of Senators playing out with the entry of other tax credits to get their grudging agreement, turning the relief bill into a tax bill with a little relief.
In the end we’re likely not to see any coronavirus bill at all. It’s already September, and at the end of the month government spending runs out. Speaker Pelosi and Treasury Secretary
Mnuchin have reportedly agreed on a stopgap that avoids a government shutdown, regardless of the impasse over stimulus. That stopgap is probably the last chance before the election for any additional measures. But House Democrats want a “clean” continuing resolution, which means that it won’t be used to pursue other stimulus
efforts.
Again, in a plutonomy, you can’t expect plutocrat-owned lawmakers (or plutocrats themselves) to see past their noses to the non-people in the streets. The stock market took a tumble yesterday, but it would take plenty more for official Washington to notice the pain.
Anyone who thinks that Donald Trump isn’t pressuring public officials to approve anything he can call a cure for the coronavirus hasn’t been paying attention for the last four years, or really ever. This is a guy who grasped at a random malaria drug and called it a silver bullet. He mused about injecting bleach to clean the body. Of course he’s going to want to roll out a vaccine before the election! He’s losing!
Just because Trump wants to announce something doesn’t mean the states have to accept it, however. And three blue states have come out and said they would have to confirm the efficacy of any vaccine or treatment before allowing it to be used on their populations.
This is the danger of the politicization of science. If government cannot be trusted, then no vaccine will resolve the crisis. It won’t get the kind of widespread takeup needed to eradicate the virus. Blue states making these noises about a Trump-declared vaccine will be followed by Republican states rejecting a
Biden-declared vaccine. The politics of the situation will overwhelm the public health effect. There are likely good reasons to be wary of Trump’s October Deus ex machina. But the impact on public health could be grave.
On a related note, read Rick Perlstein on Gerald Ford’s rush to present a swine flu vaccine in 1976, which totally backfired. (I have the exact same anecdote in a feature story coming out soon, but don’t mind me, it’s a well-told tale.)
