There’s big money—and even bigger risks—in the genetic engineering of pathogens
and viruses.
[[link removed]] [[link removed]]
SUBSCRIBE
[[link removed]] | DONATE
[[link removed]] | VIEW ON WEB
[[link removed]]
[{EXTERNAL_URL~[link removed]}]
[{EXTERNAL_URL~[link removed]}] [?SUBJECT=BIG MONEY, BIG
RISK&BODY=[link removed]]
GOF HALL OF SHAMEBIG MONEY, BIG RISK
[[link removed]]
Introducing the latest inductee into our Gain-of-Function Hall of Shame: Peter
Daszak.
Daszak is president of EcoHealth Alliance [[link removed]] , a top scientific collaborator
[[link removed]] and a grantwriter
[[link removed]] for virus hunters and gain-of-function/dual-use researchers, in labs both
military and civilian.
On behalf of the U.S. government, often the military, Daszak and his teams scour
the globe for animal pathogens, then bring them back to high-containment laboratories
[[link removed]] where they catalog, investigate and use genetic engineering and synthetic
biology to make the pathogens more infectious, contagious, lethal or
drug-resistant.
Daszak works in labs controlled by the U.S. Department of Defense, in countries
in the former Soviet Union, the Middle East, South East Asia and Africa. Many of
these labs are staffed by former biological weapons scientists. (See Arms
Watch’s reports
[[link removed]] ).
Daszak and other gain-of-function
[[link removed]] researchers justify their experiments this way: If/When an outbreak of a new
virus occurs, they can compare it to the ones in their labs, and maybe glean how
the novel virus emerged.
Critics of virus hunting say
[[link removed]] scientists like Daszak could make a greater contribution to human health by
going after the viruses that commonly infect humans, not the ones that never
have.
But that logic doesn't prevent Daszak from pulling in hundreds of millions of
dollars to fund his gain-of-function experiments.
Do Daszak and his collaborators do it just for the money? Or do they have a
bigger agenda? And why is the Pentagon constructing new laboratories
[[link removed]] around the globe, for the “consolidation and securing of pathogens?”
Read: Peter ‘Show Me the Money’ Daszak Pulls in Big Bucks, through EcoHealth
Alliance, for Risky Virus ‘Research’
[[link removed]]
Visit our Gain-of-Function Hall of Shame
[[link removed]]
SIGN THE PETITION: Stop the Genetic Engineering of Viruses! Shut Down All
Biowarfare Labs Now!
[[link removed]]
[{EXTERNAL_URL~[link removed]}]
[{EXTERNAL_URL~[link removed]}] [?SUBJECT=NOW. OR
NEVER?&BODY=[link removed]]
ACTION ALERTNOW. OR NEVER?
[[link removed]]
As a conscious consumer who takes control of your health, you may give little
thought, much less weight, to the federal Dietary Guidelines for Americans.
Maybe it’s time you did. Maybe it’s time we all do.
The dietary guidelines handed down by the federal government dictate how
hundreds of millions of your tax dollars are allocated for nutrition programs
that serve vulnerable children, seniors and veterans—the very people whose poor
health increased their risk of getting, or dying from, COVID-19
[[link removed]] .
Every five years, the U.S. Departments of Health and Human Services (HHS) and
Agriculture (USDA) hand down an updated version of the federal Dietary Guidelines for Americans
[[link removed]] .
And every five years, Big Food and Big Pharma lobbyists line up
[[link removed]] to try to influence those guidelines—either directly, or indirectly through
groups pretending to look out for you.
One of those “influencers” is the Center for Science in the Public Interest
(CSPI). For years, CSPI cozied up to Monsanto and the biotech industry. Now the
so-called “public interest” group is attacking
[[link removed]] the natural health industry for trying to keep people healthy during the
pandemic.
We had a public health crisis before the pandemic hit. A crisis caused in large part by poor diets peddled by Big
Food lobbyists and promoted by their friends in Congress. A crisis that resulted
in the U.S. racking up nearly 25 percent
[[link removed]] of all COVID-19 related deaths, despite accounting for only about 4 percent of
the global population.
If ever we needed dietary guidelines based on the latest, most rigorous science,
and solid advice on natural health, that time would be now. Five years from now
might be too late.
TAKE ACTION: Tell Members of the U.S. House Appropriations Committee: Americans
Deserve Dietary Guidelines Based on the Latest, Most Rigorous Independent
Science
[[link removed]]
TAKE ACTION: Defend Natural Medicine and Reform American Healthcare!
[[link removed]]
Read ‘Lies Exposed: CSPI’s Organized Attack Against Mercola’
[[link removed]]
[{EXTERNAL_URL~[link removed]}]
[{EXTERNAL_URL~[link removed]}] [?SUBJECT=‘MEATING’ OF THE
MINDS&BODY=[link removed]]
#BOYCOTTBIGMEAT‘MEATING’ OF THE MINDS
[[link removed]]
To eat meat, or not to eat meat: It’s probably one of the hottest debates around
the dinner table, especially for animal welfare and climate activists.
But what’s often left out of that debate is whether vegans and vegetarians can
support meat eating, if the meat doesn’t come from an industrial factory farm.
Last week, we took that question to a panel of well-known long-time vegans and
vegetarians.
We wanted to know: Could committed vegans and vegetarians support the #BoycottBigMeat
[[link removed]] campaign, which advocates for an end to factory farms but also calls for
support for farmers and ranchers who produce organic grass-fed and
pasture-raised meat using regenerative
[[link removed]] practices?
For the short answer, read our blog post
[[link removed]] . For a deeper dive, watch the full panel discussion
[[link removed]] .
Read ‘Finding Common Ground: Can Vegans, Vegetarians and Meat-Eaters Unite for
Change?’
[[link removed]]
Watch the panel discussion
[[link removed]]
TAKE ACTION: Nominate Tyson for the Corporate Accountability Hall of Shame
[[link removed]]
SIGN THE PETITION: It’s Time for Radical Reform: No More Factory Farms!
[[link removed]]
[{EXTERNAL_URL~[link removed]}]
[{EXTERNAL_URL~[link removed]}] [?SUBJECT=SNEAK
PREVIEW&BODY=[link removed]]
VIDEO OF THE WEEKSNEAK PREVIEW
[[link removed]]
“We can get Earth back to the Garden of Eden that it once was, through
regeneration.” — “ Kiss the Ground [[link removed]] ”
In the face of a crisis as enormous as climate change, it’s easy to feel
powerless.
Throw in a global pandemic, and powerlessness turns to paralyzed.
But global warming didn’t shut down during the COVID-19
[[link removed]] crisis (just ask the Iowa farmers trying to recover from a recent hurricane-force storm
[[link removed]] that wiped out nearly 14 million acres of crops). And neither can we.
The good news? There’s reason to be hopeful.
As the soon-to-be-released-on-Netflix documentary, “ Kiss the Ground [[link removed]] ,” makes clear, we already have the climate solution. It’s simple. And it’s
right beneath our feet.
“Kiss the Ground” is a full-length documentary narrated by Woody Harrelson that
sheds light on how regenerative agriculture
[[link removed]] can restore balance to our climate, replenish our vast water supplies and feed
the world.
The film will be available on Netflix beginning September 22. But you can watch the trailer
[[link removed]] now.
Watch the trailer
[[link removed]]
Host a local screening
[[link removed]]
[{EXTERNAL_URL~[link removed]}]
[{EXTERNAL_URL~[link removed]}]
[?SUBJECT=CAPTURED!&BODY=[link removed]]
NEW REPORTCAPTURED!
[[link removed]]
“Whoever wins the Presidential election in November must take agriculture
antitrust enforcement seriously and stop the blatant, corrupt cronyism between
government officials and Big Ag, or there will be no independent, family farm
agriculture as we now know it.” — Ben Gotschall, Organization for Competitive
Markets
Farmers have to deal with and overcome a lot of unknowns, from unpredictable
weather to unwanted pest invasions.
They also have to deal with this known fact: The food & farming policy deck is,
by design, stacked against them.
A new report
[[link removed]] by the Organization for Competitive Markets (OCM) reveals just how stacked that
deck is.
The report, titled “Captured: How Agribusiness Controls Regulatory Agencies and
Harms Producers and Consumers,” also makes specific policy recommendations for
leveling the playing field for independent family farmers. To illustrate how bad
things are, OCM profiled a few farmers, including Wisconsin dairy farmer Saral
Lloyd, who’s quoted in the press release:
“In these tumultuous times we see plainly that we need a truly transformational
agriculture, not more business as usual. Unfortunately, the revolving door
between the USDA, the check-off and the big corporations is squashing our
opportunity for real change.”
OCM’s report highlights many of the reasons OCA, along with Regeneration
International, last year launched the national coalition
[[link removed]] of U.S. Farmers & Ranchers for a Green New Deal.
It’s time for real change, real fast—not baby steps.
Read OCM’s press release
[[link removed]]
Read the full report
[[link removed]]
SIGN THE PETITION: Green Consumers for a Regenerative Green New Deal
[[link removed]]
[{EXTERNAL_URL~[link removed]}]
[{EXTERNAL_URL~[link removed]}] [?SUBJECT=ESSENTIAL
READING&BODY=[link removed]]
LITTLE BYTESESSENTIAL READING
[[link removed]]
Oleander Is a Deadly Plant, Not a COVID-19 Cure
[[link removed]]
Myths and Truths of Gene-Edited Foods
[[link removed]]
EPA Relaxes Rules Limiting Toxic Waste From Coal Plants
[[link removed]]
Cattle Are Part of the Climate Solution
[[link removed]]
Meatpacking Corporations Cash in on Pandemic While Family Farms and Consumers
Foot the Bill
[[link removed]]
Op-Ed: Will the Real ‘Whole Grain’ Please Stand Up?
[[link removed]]
Stop Eating Pesticides: Which Produce Should You Pick?
[[link removed]]
Follow on Twitter [[link removed]] | Friend on Facebook
[[link removed]] | OCA on Pinterest
[[link removed]] Donate
[[link removed]] Received this email from a friend? Subscribe
[[link removed]] Organic Consumers Association
[[link removed]] is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. 6771 South Silver Hill Drive - Finland, MN 55603 - Phone: 218-226-4164 - Fax:
218-353-7652
Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]