Presidents have used decoys before. What’s different this time is that the press didn’t know. Email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser.
Poynter.
The Poynter Report With Senior Media Writer Tom Jones
 

OPINION

 

Trump left Air Force One because of a threat. Journalists stayed aboard.

A catering truck is parked at Air Force One on the tarmac as the motorcade carrying President Donald Trump arrives to depart following the NATO summit at Ankara International Airport in Ankara, Turkey on July 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

The media world is still buzzing about a massive scoop from The Washington Post earlier this week.

The situation was already strange. The Post’s reporting made it even wilder.

It goes back to the NATO summit in Turkey in early July. When it came time for President Donald Trump to begin his trip home, he chose not to take the plane gifted to him by Qatar that was intended to become the new Air Force One. Instead, he said he would take the old Air Force One. The reason: so military personnel in Europe could tour the new plane.

But then several news outlets, including The New York Times, reported that the real reason for the plane switch involved security concerns about the Qatar-gifted aircraft. Trump was so furious about that story that Times reporters were issued subpoenas so the administration could try to identify who might have leaked the information.

Then this week came the bombshell report from The Washington Post’s Dan Lamothe, John Hudson, Andrew Ba Tran and Joyce Sohyun Lee: “Contradicting public statements, Trump took secret flight from Turkey amid Iranian threat.”

That shocking story revealed that Trump didn’t take the new or old Air Force One. He took a third plane.

Television cameras and photographers captured Trump boarding the old Air Force One in Turkey. But then, the Post reported, “He was secretly shuttled minutes later to a smaller plane — an Air Force C-32A — via an airport catering truck typically used to load meals and other supplies preflight.”

Trump was secretly moved to another plane because of a credible Iranian assassination threat.

So while journalists and some White House staff thought they were riding on the same plane as Trump, they were not.

The New York Times’ Maggie Haberman, Eric Schmitt and Zolan Kanno-Youngs wrote, “Reporters on the older plane were not told that Mr. Trump had not flown with them from Turkey to an air base in Britain, making them unwitting participants in the ruse and leaving them, along with some White House staff members, to serve as unknowing decoys.”

The old Air Force One and the C-32A carrying Trump both flew to Britain. After landing, Trump was secretly moved from his plane back onto the old Air Force One. He disembarked in view of reporters, walked across the tarmac and then boarded the Qatar-gifted plane to return to the U.S.

Wild, right? But not unprecedented.

In 2000, President Bill Clinton flew from India to Pakistan in an unmarked plane that followed Air Force One.

USA Today Washington bureau chief Susan Page wrote about it Tuesday. She was there in 2000 and, at the time, was president of the White House Correspondents’ Association.

Page wrote, “Before we left Bombay, White House officials took me aside for an off-the-record conversation to discuss the extraordinary security precautions being taken.”

Page added, “We also discussed concerns about the safety of the small group of journalists aboard the familiar Air Force One and the larger group traveling on the chartered press plane, which landed in Islamabad in advance of the White House planes.”

Page was not aboard Clinton’s plane to Pakistan. She wrote, “I was aboard the press plane for the flight. As far as I know, I was the only journalist who was aware of the president's plane switch. Of course, when he landed, the world realized he had switched to the unmarked plane.”

The New York Times’ Claire Moses wrote: “3 Presidents Before Trump Who Obscured Their Risky Travel Plans.”

Moses mentioned the Clinton switch in 2000. She also wrote about George W. Bush’s surprise visit to troops in Iraq around Thanksgiving 2003. That trip was such a surprise, Moses wrote, that even Bush’s own wife and parents were not told ahead of time. Back in 2003, the Times wrote that Bush’s entourage included “a few advisers and a small number of reporters sworn to secrecy.”

Then, in 2010, President Barack Obama made a secret visit to Afghanistan to meet with American troops and speak with Afghan leaders. At the time, journalists were told Obama was at Camp David.

All of this is done, understandably, to keep the president safe.

Donald Mihalek, a former Secret Service agent who worked in the protective details for Bush and Obama, told the Times decoys are regularly used. He added, “The agency is not the agency of public affairs. The agency is the agency of the Secret Service. Their number one job is to keep the president safe.”

Ronald L. Rowe Jr., a former acting director of the Secret Service, told the Post, “We need to keep the ‘secret’ in Secret Service. The public should know what the president is doing on a daily basis, but when it comes to the methods by which the Secret Service keeps the president safe, that should remain out of public view.”

But this latest Trump story is messy for two reasons. One, the press was completely unaware of Trump’s whereabouts. Second, and more importantly, you have to ask: If Trump was moved off a plane because of a credible assassination threat, were the journalists who remained on that plane potentially in danger?

Former CNN Pentagon correspondent Barbara Starr told the Post’s Scott Nover that the press understands the need to keep the president safe.

But Starr added, “there will be a level of distrust now that we have not seen before … their own lives were potentially at risk without them even knowing it, without them having the option of making a different choice of how to get home.”

The New York Times’ Peter Baker wrote, “If the Iranians really were trying to shoot down the presidential plane last month, as U.S. officials concluded at the time, then the subterfuge in Ankara, Turkey, that protected the president also may have made targets of dozens of other people who flew aboard the jet, some of them unaware that Mr. Trump was not actually with them because it was considered too dangerous.”

S.V. Dáte, White House correspondent for HuffPost, was more blunt, tweeting, “In other words everyone aboard the real 747 AF1 — crew, guests, press pool — was considered expendable.”

Those who rode on the decoy Air Force One were reportedly told to lower their window shades. After arriving, they asked Trump if security concerns were the reason the shades had to be lowered. Now, mind you, at that moment, they believed Trump had traveled on the same plane.

Trump told them, “Well, I have a threat all the time. I’m No. 1 on their list, before you. But if I go, you go. Right? Perhaps someday you want to change professions.”

Or maybe change planes.

Nover wrote for the Post, “One White House reporter, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to talk publicly, said that they were outraged to learn about an operation that might have put the press corps in danger.”

That reporter told Nover, “When you sign up to work at the White House, even as a civilian, part of your job is to defend the president. That’s not my job. I cover the president. Reporters take risks as part of the job, but not on behalf of the president.”

   

A MESSAGE FROM POYNTER

New from MediaWise: Weekly lessons for educators

Coming this September: MediaWise Weekly, a free series of classroom-ready lessons from Poynter's MediaWise. Each week includes a video from Local News International co-founder and former Washington Post TikTok Dave Jorgenson, paired with a bite-sized lesson connecting news stories to media literacy skills. Supported by the Andrew Carnegie Foundation, the first 1,000 educators who sign up will receive complimentary one-year subscriptions to Local News International newsletters and weekly lesson plan alerts.

Sign up today 

   

The WHCA response

The White House Correspondents’ Association has not publicly addressed the Trump plane switch, but Status’ Oliver Darcy reported Tuesday night that WHCA leadership has reached out to its members — and raised its concerns directly with the Trump administration.

Darcy obtained an off-the-record note sent to WHCA members by new WHCA president Jacqui Heinrich, senior White House correspondent for Fox News.

Heinrich wrote, “Immediately after it broke, we spoke with members who were on the flight and heard from a number of managers and pool chairs about the broader concerns raised by the report, including press safety, the ability of the pool to maintain an independent record of the president’s movements, and the integrity and credibility of pooled reporting. This afternoon, I had a candid and productive meeting with senior administration officials to convey those concerns directly.”

The pool reporters (that is, those traveling with the president) had two issues. One was their ability to provide the public with accurate information about the president’s whereabouts. The other was the safety of the journalists traveling with him.

Heinrich added, “More broadly, I stressed that undermining confidence in the reliability of pool reports carries risks beyond any single incident. In an already conspiratorial information environment, uncertainty about whether independent reporting can be trusted can be exploited by bad actors seeking to sow confusion and undermine confidence in journalism. I therefore asked the White House to work with us on a protocol for handling extraordinary security circumstances in the future — one that recognizes the Secret Service’s responsibility to respond to genuine threats while protecting press safety, preserving independent coverage of the president, and providing a mechanism to correct the record after the fact when necessary.”

A MAGA divide

Another story generating buzz is, of all things, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s decision to freeze her eggs.

The New York Democratic congresswoman took to social media last weekend to say she had decided to freeze her eggs. The 36-year-old said, “There is very strangely a political risk, or a political tax, that comes with sharing this info.”

She also said, “Don’t be weird about this, even though I know all of you will be. … I think it’s important for us as leaders to have these conversations and share these processes, especially for working women across the country, and normalize them.”

Not surprisingly, her announcement quickly drew commentary from prominent voices on the right.

First off, no matter what AOC does, she is going to be a target of criticism by many on the right. They don’t seem to like anything about her.

But, according to Axios’ Marc Caputo, the harsh criticism of Ocasio-Cortez is bothering Republicans, including some in the White House.

Mediaite’s David Gilmour noted some examples of the heat.

MAGA commentator Matt Walsh suggested she will be too old to have kids. Andrew Kolvet, spokesman for Turning Point USA, did the same, and mocked her choice. Laura Loomer was critical, too, calling it a “political stunt.”

But Caputo wrote, “Some of the online backlash from the conservative right is making Republicans, including some in the White House, a little nervous.”

One White House official told Caputo, “We most certainly want to encourage more women and families to have children, period. That’s a diplomatic way of saying, ‘Yes, the Matt Walsh messaging is not helpful.'”

Another Trump adviser said, “This isn’t really a winner for Republicans.”

Podcaster Katie Miller, wife of Trump adviser Stephen Miller, also appeared to support Ocasio-Cortez, tweeting in part, “If one woman wants to preserve her right to have children, which means more than having none — we should celebrate that. If she inspires other women to have babies, we should celebrate that.”

Talking about renovating

President Donald Trump speaks as he tours Ballroom construction around the outside the White House last May. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

A couple of weeks ago, New York Times White House correspondent Maggie Haberman was a guest on Ezra Klein’s podcast. Haberman and Times colleague Jonathan Swan are the authors of “Regime Change,” a book about the first 14 months of Trump’s second term.

During their conversation, Klein asked Haberman how much of Trump’s time is spent on White House renovations.

Haberman said, “A lot. If you looked at a chart of his mind share — this I will say about getting into his mind: 70% of it would be on his renovations.”

Think about that: 70%! And that’s with a war going on.

So keep that in mind while reading this superb piece from Poynter’s PolitiFact: “We crunched the numbers: Trump devoted 45,000 words to construction like Reflecting Pool, ballroom.”

Caleb McCullough and Loreben Tuquero wrote, “PolitiFact analyzed all of Trump’s public events and speeches over the first seven months of 2026 in which he mentioned his construction projects — including the White House ballroom and Reflecting Pool — and beautifying the nation’s capital. The records include official events, signing ceremonies, press conferences and prerecorded messages, covering Trump’s recorded, spoken words. They don’t include print interviews or posts from his Truth Social account, where he also frequently discusses the projects.”

To compile the report, PolitiFact used artificial intelligence, standard software and human analysis. You can read about the methodology here.

McCullough and Tuquero wrote, “Trump’s remarks on the construction projects added up to nearly 45,000 words since January. He mentioned them at 84 events across 66 days, more than a quarter of all his public events during that period. In events where the construction projects came up, he’s talked more about the projects than topics such as the economy and immigration. The only topic he talked about more during the events where he talked about construction was Iran and the Iran war, which took up nearly 56,000 words and came up in 73 of the 84 events.”

This piece features captivating charts and graphs to illustrate what seems to be Trump’s true passion in his second term.

Ellison’s threats

Paramount’s mega deal to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery appears to be on hold until next March. That’s when a court case is scheduled to begin after a dozen Democratic-led states sued to stop the deal, claiming it violates antitrust laws.

But now Paramount CEO David Ellison is trying to push the deal through by threatening to move his company out of California if a settlement cannot be reached by the end of September. California Attorney General Rob Bonta is leading the coalition of states opposed to the deal.

Puck’s Matthew Belloni broke the news that Ellison informed senior executives at Paramount about the potential move.

Variety’s Todd Spangler wrote, “The reason Ellison gave to his senior leadership team for the relocation out of California was that Paramount will need to cut costs once the ‘ticking fee’ payable to Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders kicks in starting Oct. 1. On that date, Paramount will begin accruing fees owed to WBD shareholders of $7 million per day until the deal closes. The trial in the state AGs’ lawsuit is scheduled to start March 2, 2027, roughly five months after that, so Paramount would be on the hook to pay around $1.2 billion to WBD shareholders by the time the trial is scheduled to conclude.”

After news of Ellison’s potential move broke, Bonta took to social media and wrote, “In a span of weeks, Paramount agreed to halt the merger until a court decision or until June 2027, asked for a November trial, and is now back with another attempt to blackmail the state into letting an illegal deal through. Paramount has lost the plot as it continues to lose in court. It didn't work the first time —  on the eve of our July lawsuit — and it won't work this time.”

Media tidbits

  • Ross Douthat, the former New York Times opinion columnist who is joining “60 Minutes” as a correspondent, was a guest on the podcast hosted by the Times’ Ezra Klein. Here’s a transcript. You can also listen to the conversation wherever you get your podcasts.
  • For Nieman Lab, Avner Kantor with “We analyzed 6,400 New York Times stories to find out how comments change when you give readers more information.”
  • Mediaite’s Zachary Leeman with “‘Why Is He Talking to You?’ Scott Jennings Pressed On Why McConnell Gives Him Health Updates.”
  • Variety’s Brian Steinberg with “Tammy Fine to Lead Talent Development at NBC News.”
  • Former President Barack Obama is starting a new podcast, but it won’t be about politics. It will be about the books that have influenced him over the years. The podcast will be called “A Great Book With Barack Obama,” and it will debut next month. Obama said in a statement, “Great books have always helped me figure out who I am and what I believe. The six books featured in this series have stayed with me throughout my life, and each one has something to teach us about the human experience.”

Hot type

  • As we approach the 25th anniversary of 9/11, The Atlantic’s Sally Jenkins with “The Man Who Refused to Sit on the Sidelines.”
  • In a New York Times opinion piece, Michelle Goldberg with “He Says Obscene Things About Mothers and Children. Mike Johnson Is Raising Money for Him.”

More resources for journalists

  • Join our first Leading AI in the Newsroom course, beginning with an in-person workshop in Los Angeles. Learn to build trust, drive adoption and lead AI initiatives while upholding journalistic values. The application deadline is Aug. 14. Apply now.
  • Learn critical skills that new managers need in this dynamic, in-person, five-day workshop: Nov. 16-20, 2026, in St. Petersburg, Florida. Apply now.
  • Get access to top courses and members-only webinars, including Navigating Ethical Dilemmas on Sept. 30. Join Poynter for $50 (regularly $75) with code SUMMER through August 31. Sign up now.

Have feedback or a tip? Email Poynter senior media writer Tom Jones at [email protected].

The Poynter Report is your daily dive into the world of media, packed with the latest news and insights. Get it delivered to your inbox Monday through Friday by signing up here. And don’t forget to tune into our biweekly podcast for even more.

Poynter.
Support the journalism that keeps you informed.
GIVE NOW
 
ADVERTISE // DONATE // LEARN // JOBS
Did someone forward you this email? Sign up here.
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Instagram Reply
Poynter.
Poynter Teaching
The Newmark Ethics Center
International Fact-Checking Network
MediaWise
PolitiFact
© All rights reserved Poynter Institute 2026
801 Third Street South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701

If you don't want to receive email updates from Poynter, we understand.
You can change your subscription preferences or unsubscribe from all Poynter emails.