SpaceX: Elon Musk's 'Trojan Horse'. Everyone is focused on the rockets. That's
exactly what Elon wants… Hidden inside the S-1 is a $1.3 trillion AI "trojan
horse" Wall Street completely missed.
<[link removed]>
Сⅼіϲkhеrе and I'll reveal the shocking details. <[link removed]>
SpaceX: Elon Musk's 'Trojan Horse'
<[link removed]>
Everyone is focused on the rockets. That's exactly what Elon wants… Hidden
inside the S-1 is a $1.3 trillion AI "trojan horse" Wall Street completely
missed. Rob Spivey – whose institutional research is followed by Goldman Sachs,
JPMorgan Chase, BlackRock, and Fidelity – called Elon's last three big moves
before anyone else. When Elon makes a big move, billions of dollars move, too.
All you have to do is follow the money… Rob is giving away his No. 1 stock
recommendation at the center of Elon's hidden empire, free…
Get it here before this briefing comes down.
<[link removed]>
This ad is sent on behalf of Altimetry, 110 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA
02141. If you would like to optout from receiving offers from Altimetry please
click here
<[link removed]>
.
Сⅼіϲkhеrе and I'll reveal the shocking details. <[link removed]>
Today's Market Update For You
Brent Crude Collapsed From a Peak Near $113 to Below $80 Following the
U.S.-Iran MOU, but the Strait of Hormuz Remains Contested — and the EIA Has Cut
Its 2026 Global Oil Demand Forecast by1.2 Million Barrels Per Day
The U.S. and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding in June to end the
conflict and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, triggering a reversal in Brent crude
that brought the benchmark from its March peak near$113.52 down through $80 —
and further to roughly$79.36 in early August as Treasury Secretary Scott
Bessent told markets that a full deal "could happen today or tomorrow" — yet
tanker attacks have continued, the strait has not fully reopened, and the
energy demand destruction created by the five-month disruption is now a
separate headwind the oil complex must absorb on its own.
The mechanism behind the price collapse is not the MOU itself — memoranda of
understanding are non-binding diplomatic instruments — but the market's
willingness to front-run the supply normalization it implies. Brent's move from
$113 to $79 reflects a repricing from a war-premium regime to a
diplomatic-resolution regime, a shift that typically overshoots because traders
discount the headline faster than physical supply chains can respond. The
complication is the demand side: the Energy Information Administration
forecasts that global oil consumption will decline by an average of1.2 million
barrels per day across 2026, with 0.8 million b/d of that reduction
concentrated in non-OECD Asian economies that have been diverting around the
strait since March. Even a clean Hormuz reopening does not automatically
restore that demand; industrial and refining capacity utilization reductions
made during the disruption period take months to reverse.
Oil Market — The Price Regime Shift in Numbers
Brent Peak (March 2026)$113.52Peak following Hormuz blockade; represented a
~50% surge from pre-conflict levels
Brent Current (Aug 2026)~$79Lowest since early July; diplomacy has repriced
the war premium nearly to zero
Global Demand Hit (2026 EIA)−1.2M b/dFull-year 2026 demand reduction; 0.8M b/d
from non-OECD Asia, the most Hormuz-exposed region
U.S. Crude Output Forecast13.6M b/d2026 EIA forecast; roughly 500K b/d above
pre-conflict estimate as higher prices accelerated domestic drilling
The Supply-Demand Imbalance — What a Full Reopening Still Can't Fix
What a clean Hormuz reopening provides What it does not automatically restore
Tanker traffic normalized; approximately 20% of global oil flows resumes
through the strait without military escortAsian refinery utilization rates
reduced during the blockade take months to rebuild; demand does not snap back
instantaneously
Geopolitical war premium removed; Brent trades closer to EIA's $79/b 2026
average forecastThe 1.2M b/d demand destruction is structural for 2026; oil
cannot price in recovery demand it cannot yet see in hard consumption data
U.S. energy sector equities lose the conflict premium but retain the benefit
of elevated domestic production economicsOPEC+ faces second-largest producer
exit risk if Iran disputes MOU fund allocation; cartel discipline is uncertain
at sub-$80 Brent
Inflation risk from energy eases, reducing the probability of a Fed hike in
SeptemberIf the MOU collapses and Hormuz disruptions resume, the Iran war
premium at $113 was not an overshoot — it was a floor
Oil's move from $113 to $79 priced a diplomatic resolution. The price can only
stay there if the resolution holds — and the demand it destroyed cannot price
in recovery until Asian data confirms it.
The energy market's primary analytical question has shifted from "how high
can oil go on a Hormuz blockade" to "how durable is the$79–$85 Brent range
under a partial normalization scenario." The answer depends on two variables
that are not yet resolved: whether the MOU holds through its implementation
phase as both governments manage domestic political constraints on compliance,
and whether the1.2 million b/d demand reduction reverses in the second half of
the year as Asian industrial activity recovers. Until both variables clarify,
energy-sector equity valuations remain anchored to a peace-deal probability
rather than a fundamental supply-demand balance — a basis that introduces
significant gap-down risk if diplomatic progress stalls.
Sources: EIA Short-Term Energy Outlook · CNBC · The National
<[link removed]>
[email protected] is on TheRawCapital.com <[link removed]>
list because you opted in before the crowd caught on.
If we go quiet — look in promotions, updates, or wherever your inbox files
things it hasn't figured out yet.
Unsubscribe
<[link removed]>
. We'll part ways cleanly.
If something's off, you can reach us here <mailto:
[email protected]>
254 Chapman Rd Ste 208 Newark, Delaware 19702.
Privacy Policy <[link removed]>
© 2026 Alpha One Marketers LLC. All rights reserved.