*Please consider adding <[email protected]> to your address
book, which will ensure that our messages reach you and not your spam
box.*

*Read and share online:
<[link removed]>*


Dear DRM Elimination Crew,

*The United States Copyright Office has released a report recommending
updates to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), while leaving
anti-circumvention rules unchanged.*

Over twenty years ago, the United States enacted a law known as the
DMCA. The law amended the Copyright Act of 1976, implementing a series
of rules addressing the changing technology landscape. The most
damaging aspect of that law is section 1201, which implements rules
preventing the circumvention of Digital Restrictions Management (DRM),
and the sharing of tools needed for circumvention. This aspect of the
law creates legal penalties for any user trying to control their own
computing, or who tries to help their neighbor do likewise. It's
pretty strange to refer to this activity as circumvention since really
it's just regaining full control of bits present on your own computer,
but this is the terminology used in the law. While ostensibly meant to
enforce copyright, [companies][1] and [government agencies][2] over
the past two decades have abused this law for whatever purpose they
see fit.

[1]: [link removed]
[2]: [link removed]

The anti-circumvention provisions harm all users, and the only
reprieve from its abuse is a comically [broken exemptions][3]
system. As we wrote previously:

> Every three years, supporters of user rights are forced to go
> through a Kafkaesque process fighting for exemptions from the
> anti-circumvention provisions of the DMCA... In short, under the
> DMCA's rules, everything not permitted is forbidden. Unless we
> expend time and resources to protect and expand exemptions, users
> could be threatened with legal consequences for circumventing the
> DRM on their own devices and software and could face criminal
> penalties for sharing tools that allow others to do the
> same. Exemptions don't fix the harm wrought by the DMCA's
> anti-circumvention provisions, but they're the only crumbs Congress
> deigned to throw us when they tossed out our rights as users.

[3]: [link removed]

For years now, we have [called on][4] the government to end this
madness and repeal the anti-circumvention provisions. So when the
Copyright Office released a report on the DMCA earlier this spring,
there was some hope that change would come. But our hopes were dashed
when the report's main recommendations related to other rules in the
DMCA, in particular the safe harbor provisions. The DMCA's safe harbor
provisions implement the take-down notice system that many users are
likely familiar with via video sharing sites. Users stung by
take-downs likely won't enjoy the Copyright Office's recommendations
on that aspect of the law, and the failure to meaningfully address or
recommend change to the anti-circumvention provisions is shameful.

[4]: [link removed]

The recommendations do nothing to protect the rights of users, who
have demanded for years that the DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions
must be repealed. The report comes at an important time, as the United
States Congress is considering amending the decades-old law. But like
the Copyright Office, they too seem more interested in twisting up the
Internet over the law's safe harbor provisions.

While the buzz of change is in the air, for users, things are feeling
all too familiar. We are once again facing down the barrel of the
broken anti-circumventions exemptions process. The push for renewals
of previously existing exemptions has already begun, and the fight to
gain new exemptions will start in short order. Like so many times
before, activists will be expected to expend time and resources
proving that their rights are infringed by DRM, in order to gain
narrow exemptions that can be challenged every three years. Even where
we succeed in gaining exemptions, we know that sharing the tools
needed to take advantage of them will still be prohibited. If users
can't share knowledge and tools about how to remove DRM for one of the
exempt purposes, then only users skilled enough to break DRM on their
own can benefit from them -- an utterly ridiculous situation. So while
we will support specific exemptions in the hopes of winning a little
ground for freedom, our main message will continue to be that the
entire broken system should be abolished.

And continue we must. Past actions have gained us some success, like
[simplifying the process for renewing exemptions][5], but we have to
keep building on that success and keep fighting for every inch. The
Copyright Office and Congress ignore us at their peril, because users
have the right to control their own computing, and people will never
give up fighting for their rights. Will you help us in this fight?
Please contact your local congressional representative and let them
know that any amendment to the DMCA has to repeal the
anti-circumvention provisions.

[5]: [link removed]

Cheers!

Donald R. Robertson, III, J.D.
Licensing and Compliance Manager

--
* Follow us on Mastodon at <[link removed]>, on GNU
social at <[link removed]>, or on Twitter at
<[link removed]>.
* Read about why we use Twitter, but only with caveats at <[link removed]>.
* Subscribe to our blog via RSS at <[link removed]>.
* Donate to support the campaign at <[link removed]>.
* Read the Free Software Foundation Privacy Policy at <[link removed]>.

You can unsubscribe from the Defective by Design mailing list by visiting the link <[link removed]>.

To stop all email from the Free Software Foundation, including Defective by Design and the Free Software Supporter newsletter, click this link: <[link removed]>.

Defective by Design is a campaign of the Free Software Foundation:

51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02110-1335
United States