Megyn Kelly isn't buying that the recent influencer pile-on against her and Tucker Carlson is organic — she says it's about 2028 (youtube.com). In her telling, a coordinated campaign by newer right-leaning online personalities is targeting legacy conservative voices perceived as too independent or insufficiently loyal to specific candidates — namely Vice President JD Vance. The message to anyone who won't fall in line: get on board or get taken out.

It's a revealing look at a growing fault line on the right. The post-Trump GOP succession battle is already being waged — not in Iowa or New Hampshire, but in the feeds, comment sections, and subscriber counts of conservative media. Kelly frames herself and Carlson as independent voices refusing to be corralled, while a new generation of influencers flexes real grassroots muscle to enforce ideological conformity. If she's right, the 2028 primary is well underway — and the first battleground is the right's own media ecosystem.

Glenn Beck is sounding the alarm on what could be the biggest election-security bombshell in years: President Trump has presented documents allegedly proving that China obtained data on roughly 220 million American voters (youtube.com). If true, the breach would dwarf even the devastating 2015 hack of the Office of Personnel Management, which exposed the personal records of over 21 million federal employees (oversight.house.gov). Beck's point: this story should be front-page news everywhere, and the silence from legacy media is deafening.

For years, Washington obsessed over Russian election interference. Now, with hard evidence pointing at Beijing, the same outlets that ran wall-to-wall Russia coverage seem remarkably uninterested. The question isn't just whether China stole the data — it's what they're doing with it, and why so few people in power seem eager to find out.

Ben Shapiro says President Trump's speech on election meddling was about much more than voter ID — it was a warning shot about the Chinese Communist Party's systematic campaign to destabilize American institutions (youtube.com). While the media predictably fixated on the domestic politics of the SAVE Act — which would require documentary proof of citizenship to register for federal elections (congress.gov) — Shapiro argues the real story is Beijing's multi-front assault on American sovereignty, and almost nobody is covering it.

For conservatives, this is where two of the biggest issues on the board converge: election integrity and the escalating confrontation with China. Shapiro's framing elevates the SAVE Act from a standard voter-ID fight into a national security imperative. Pass it or don't — but understand that the threat isn't just about who shows up at the polls. It's about a hostile foreign power with the means and the motive to manipulate them.

Pink Floyd legend Roger Waters sat down with Tucker Carlson to make a case most in the mainstream won't touch: that the deadliest terror attack on American soil never received a proper criminal investigation. Waters is backing the family of Geoff Campbell, a British citizen killed in the North Tower, whose brother Matt has waged a years-long legal battle to secure a new coronial inquest in the UK — a fight that has now reached the UK Supreme Court (geoffcampbell911.co.uk). It's one of the only active judicial challenges to the completeness of the 9/11 record anywhere in the world.

The interview is classic Carlson territory — provocative questions about government transparency, the limits of official narratives, and who gets to decide which questions are acceptable to ask. Waters, already a lightning rod for his outspoken BDS advocacy, doesn't shy away from the heat, framing the push as basic accountability while his critics label it conspiracy theorizing (youtube.com). Whether you agree with Waters or not, the Campbell family's legal campaign raises a legitimate point: why has no government fully reinvestigated the worst attack in modern Western history?