From The National Center <[email protected]>
Subject The Correct Way to Rebuild American Medical Security
Date August 28, 2020 1:00 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
“Buy American” initiatives to bring manufacturing of vital medications and personal protective equipment (PPE) back to the U.S. is a worthwhile...

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]
Hello John,

“Buy American” initiatives ([link removed]) to bring manufacturing of vital medications and personal protective equipment (PPE) back to the U.S. is a worthwhile policy, but it’s “worth doing well.”

[link removed] what National Center President David Ridenour ([link removed]) notes in a commentary published by newspapers such as the St. Louis American ([link removed]) , Fergus Falls Daily Journal ([link removed]) and Princeton Herald ([link removed]) . He also provides good news that the United States may not be as beholden to the Chinese government for health care products as had initially been feared.

That being said, there’s now an opportunity to figure out the best repatriation strategy to ensure a healthier and safer America:

These policymakers have the right idea, making more medicines and medical gear in the United States could help ensure we’re equipped to handle the next pandemic without relying on trading partners. But bolstering the domestic supply chain will take time – and rushing the process could cause the shortages that policymakers hope to avoid.

David notes that the repatriation process could cost $2 billion over a decade just for drugs, and that policymakers “can’t just snap their fingers and repatriate the supply chain.” But incentives to manufacturers could streamline the process.
[link removed]

And there is breathing room in light of the fact that Chinese domination of the health care market appears to be “wildly exaggerated.”

For example:
* America is less dependent on China for essential products than many Buy American advocates believe. We already manufacture 70 percent of essential medical equipment domestically. Of the remaining 30 percent, most comes from Ireland, Germany, and Switzerland. China trails as the fourth-largest supplier ([link removed]) .
* Twenty-eight percent of facilities capable of manufacturing ([link removed]) “active pharmaceutical ingredients” (API) – the chemicals used to make drugs – are based in the United States, 26 percent in the European Union and 18% in India. China lags behind at just 13%. Only three of the 370 drugs deemed “essential” by the World Health Organization contain active pharmaceutical ingredients sourced solely from China.

COVID-19 has “highlight[ed] the dangers of our globalized world.” And while it’s sensible to not rely on countries like China that seek to dominate us, David writes that policymakers need to take the time to adopt a commonsense approach for mending past mistakes.

Click here ([link removed]) to read all of “China and Our Medical Supply Chain” at the St. Louis American website.
READ ON OUR WEBSITE ([link removed])
SHARE THIS EMAIL
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed] https%3A%2F%2Fnationalcenter.org%2Fncppr%2F2020%2F08%2F24%2Fthe-correct-way-to-rebuild-american-medical-security%2F Tweet ([link removed] https%3A%2F%2Fnationalcenter.org%2Fncppr%2F2020%2F08%2F24%2Fthe-correct-way-to-rebuild-american-medical-security%2F)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
READ MORE FROM THE NATIONAL CENTER ([link removed])

The National Center for Public Policy Research is a communications and research foundation supportive of a strong national defense and dedicated to providing free market solutions to today’s public policy problems. We believe that the principles of a free market, individual liberty and personal responsibility provide the greatest hope for meeting the challenges facing America in the 21st century.
Help support The National Center
A gift to The National Center will be used to fund critically-important programs not offered by any other group, including:
* The Free Enterprise Project (FEP), the liberty movement’s only full-service shareholder and activism group that’s effective in pushing corporate America to the right;
* Project 21, the liberty movement’s only public relations agency for black conservatives and libertarians that has already created over 40,000 media opportunities;
* The Environment and Enterprise Institute (EEI), which counters misinformation being spread by the environmental left.

DONATE NOW ([link removed])

============================================================
CONNECT WITH US
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2020 The National Center for Public Policy Research, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.

Our mailing address is:
The National Center for Public Policy Research
20 F Street NW
Suite 700
Washington, DC 20001
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis