From FlashReport’s “So, Does It Matter?” <[email protected]>
Subject Awful Top-Two System Forced Republicans Voters To Get Strategic To Avoid Lock-Out In Governor’s Race
Date June 11, 2026 1:30 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
View this post on the web at [link removed]

[REMINDER, WE ARE ON A VACATION SCHEDULE THIS WEEK AND NEXT]
Our morning content is free for all subscribers and guests! Usually our afternoon content is behind a paywall, but not when I am previewing a California Post column… If you are not yet a paid subscriber, consider upgrading — you are missing a significant portion of what we produce each week, and your support makes it possible. If you want to get it all and support my efforts, please consider a paid subscription!
You can also listen to this post — along with my California Post column — on our podcast feed, So, Does It Matter? SPOKEN. It is available on your favorite podcast app. And you can listen to it here [ [link removed] ].
California’s Peculiar Primary System Forced the GOP to Get Strategic
My latest California Post column examines a reality that many California conservatives faced this year: under the state’s top-two primary system, voting for your favorite candidate is not always the same thing as voting strategically.
For much of the race, Steve Hilton and Chad Bianco split Republican support, while Xavier Becerra and Tom Steyer consolidated Democratic votes. As Election Day approached, a growing number of Republicans began asking a difficult question: what happens if the GOP vote remains divided?
In my full column, I examine how California’s primary system changes voter behavior, why many conservatives ultimately rallied behind Hilton, and how close Republicans may have come to being completely shut out of the November ballot.
The larger issue goes beyond any one election.
California’s top-two system was sold as a reform that would empower voters. Instead, it often forces voters to think less about who they most want to represent them and more about who can survive the primary.
When voters feel compelled to abandon their first choice to prevent their least-favored outcome, is that really a healthier democracy?
This year, Republicans successfully navigated that challenge. But the election also exposed the unintended consequences of a system that routinely rewards strategy over preference.
👉 Read my full California Post column HERE [ [link removed] ]. (No Paywall)

Unsubscribe [link removed]?
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis