From National Constitution Center <[email protected]>
Subject New episode of We the People: The Next Big Second Amendment Case?
Date August 31, 2019 12:00 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
A roundup of constitutional news and debate New Episode of We the People Podcast The Next Big Second Amendment Case? A challenge to a New York City gun regulation could be the Supreme Court’s first major Second Amendment ruling in almost a decade. Adam Winkler of UCLA Law and Ilya Shapiro of the CATO Institute discuss the case with host Jeffrey Rosen. LISTEN TO WE THE PEOPLE Live at America's Town Hall podcast Listen to the live constitutional conversations held here at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia and across the country! This week's episode: Armed in America If you're enjoying our podcasts, please rate and review them on Apple Podcasts here: Live at America's Town Hall and We the People The Latest at Constitution Daily Blog Shays' Rebellion starts in Massachusetts On August 29, 1786, a popular uprising began in Massachusetts. Shays’ Rebellion was one of several critical events that led to the calling of a Constitutional Convention the following year in Philadelphia. Why is August 26 known as Women's Equality Day? The 19th Amendment gave women the right to vote nationally on August 18, 1920, so why is Women’s Equality Day on August 26 each year? 10 fascinating facts about the "I Have A Dream" speech On August 28, 1963, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., gave his famous “I Have A Dream” speech as part of the March on Washington. Constitution Daily explores the speech and the events that led up to it. READ THE BLOG The Big Debate: Are "faithless" electors unconstitutional? Last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit ruled that members of the Electoral College are not bound to vote for the candidate who won their state—rather, electors have a constitutional right to vote for whomever they want. The plaintiff in the case, Michael Baca, a Democrat, is being called a "faithless" elector because, despite being required to vote for statewide winner Hillary Clinton, he cast his electoral vote for John Kasich. Baca was then replaced with a new elector, who voted for Clinton. Baca's case has sparked debate over whether the 1952 Supreme Court case Ray v. Blair actually resolved the "faithless" elector question. In that case, the Supreme Court held that where state law authorizes a party to choose its electors for a primary, the party can require electors to pledge to support the party's national nominee, under the 12th Amendment. Analysis from the Constitution Center Can states control how presidential electors vote? by Lyle Denniston Constitutional Clause of the Week Section 1 of the 12th Amendment "The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President..." The Twelfth Amendment by Sanford Levinson The Interactive Constitution is the leading digital resource about the Constitution’s history and its meaning today. A free online platform, the Interactive Constitution brings scholars from across the legal and philosophical spectrum to explore the meaning of each provision of our founding document. EXPLORE THE INTERACTIVE CONSTITUTION Latest Program from the National Constitution Center 2019 Annual Supreme Court Review Former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement, legal scholars Erwin Chemerinsky and Frederick Lawrence, and Slate’s Dahlia Lithwick, examine the Supreme Court’s 2018-19 term, which includes significant cases regarding religious displays, the death penalty, partisan gerrymandering, the census, and more. Melissa Garlick, civil rights national counsel for the Anti-Defamation League, moderates. This program was presented in partnership with the Anti-Defamation League. Continuing Legal Education Credit For Debate: Can the President Use Emergency Powers to Build the Wall? 1.0 CLE substantive credit  This year, President Trump issued a presidential proclamation declaring a national emergency to fund the construction of a wall along the southern border. Join national legal commentator Jonathan Turley and National Review editor Rich Lowry for a debate examining the constitutional legal arguments for and against Trump’s emergency declaration. Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, moderates. The National Constitution Center's CLE programs, which can be attended in-person or on-demand online, are accredited in various states. Please check your state rules for specific forms and procedures. For more information, visit constitutioncenter.org/CLE. The National Constitution Center in Philadelphia brings together people of all ages and perspectives, across America and around the world, to learn about, debate, and celebrate the greatest vision of human freedom in history, the U.S. Constitution. A private, nonprofit organization, the Center serves as America’s leading platform for constitutional education and debate, fulfilling our congressional charter “to disseminate information about the U.S. Constitution on a nonpartisan basis.” The National Constitution Center’s educational programs are made possible through the generosity of foundations, corporations, and individual donors and members nationwide. Click here to learn about our work, made possible through your support. DONATE For more information about supporting the National Constitution Center, call 215-409-6767. Questions or comments? EMAIL US STAY CONNECTED ‌ ‌ ‌ National Constitution Center | Independence Mall, 525 Arch St, Philadelphia, PA 19106 Unsubscribe [email protected] Update Profile | About Constant Contact Sent by [email protected] in collaboration with Try email marketing for free today!
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis