From Morning Watchlist <[email protected]>
Subject The $1B Defense Deal Everyone Misunderstands
Date May 30, 2026 1:07 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
14 countries deploy NASAMS. One bidder makes it. ͏  ͏  ͏
 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏
 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏
 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏
 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏
 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏
 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏
 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏
 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏
 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏




 

[Morning Watchlist]

_You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to BEHIND THE
MARKETS. If you no longer wish to receive these emails,
please unsubscribe
[[link removed]] here._

YOUR ELECTRIC BILL JUST BECAME AN AI TAX. RESIDENTIAL RATES ARE UP
36%. AND 27 STATES ARE ABOUT TO FIGHT BACK.

_A quick note from Behind the Markets_

Wall Street loves defense… as long as it's a headline. A contract
drops. The stock pops. Everyone moves on.

But the real money is made in the boring middle: manufacturing
capacity.

-------------------------

1) RAYTHEON'S $1.02B NASAMS DEAL IS A REMINDER: AIR DEFENSE ISN'T
"NEWS" — IT'S A MULTI-YEAR INDUSTRIAL CYCLE

The Pentagon awarded Raytheon a $1,020,659,819 firm-fixed-price
contract to deliver NASAMS air defense fire units to Kuwait. Work runs
through MAY 2031. The entire amount — every dollar — was OBLIGATED
AT AWARD, not phased or conditional. And it's 100% FUNDED THROUGH
FOREIGN MILITARY SALES.

Kuwait is writing the check. Not the U.S. taxpayer.

Raytheon was the SOLE BIDDER. No competition. When a billion-dollar
defense system attracts one bid, it tells you the barriers to entry
are structural — qualification, integration, and production capacity
that can't be replicated.

Raytheon's president of Land and Air Defense Systems, Tom Laliberty,
said it directly: "SUSTAINED COMBAT SUCCESS HAS DRIVEN SURGING
INTERNATIONAL DEMAND FOR NASAMS, PROVING ITS ABILITY TO NEUTRALIZE
AIRCRAFT, DRONES, AND ADVANCED CRUISE MISSILES." He added that RTX is
"INVESTING HEAVILY ACROSS THE COMPANY TO ACCELERATE THE PRODUCTION OF
CRITICAL AIR DEFENSE CAPABILITIES LIKE NASAMS."

NASAMS is now deployed in 14 COUNTRIES. And the demand pipeline is
accelerating. In April 2026, the Pentagon awarded a separate $235
MILLION contract for AMRAAM-ER FULL-RATE PRODUCTION — the
interceptor missile that arms NASAMS — naming KUWAIT, HUNGARY,
LITHUANIA, THE NETHERLANDS, NORWAY, AND TAIWAN as customers. That's
six allied nations ordering the same missile for the same system
simultaneously.

This sits inside the broader air defense buildout we've tracked all
month: PAC-3 ramping from 600 to 2,000 INTERCEPTORS PER YEAR ($4.7
billion, 94% allied-funded). THAAD quadrupling capacity. SM-6 ramping
from 125 to 500+. The GPI hypersonic interceptor pulled forward to
2029. And the U.S. burned through 1,800 PATRIOT INTERCEPTORS IN 16
DAYS of the Iran conflict — proving the demand isn't theoretical.

THE COMPANY AT THE CENTER OF THE AIR DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL RAMP:

Company: RTX CORPORATION (SYM: RTX)
The parent of Raytheon — manufacturer of NASAMS, AMRAAM, AMRAAM-ER,
Tomahawk, SM-6, PAC-3, and the DARPA Burn n' Go composable motor
program. Now carrying the largest air defense backlog in the company's
history.

RTX is currently trading around $180.37. The NASAMS deal alone
provides revenue visibility through 2031. Layer on the seven-year
munitions framework (Tomahawk from 60 to 1,000/year, AMRAAM to 1,900,
SM-6 to 500+), the PAC-3 production ramp, the AMRAAM-ER full-rate
production with six allied customers, and the DARPA propulsion program
— and you're looking at a company whose backlog could sustain
production growth for a decade regardless of which headlines dominate
the news cycle. RTX's Advanced Technology president just admitted
propulsion is "a critical bottleneck." The company is both naming the
constraint _and_ developing the technology to solve it.

BOTTOM LINE: A multi-year air defense contract isn't a "one-day
catalyst." It's the visible part of a longer industrial buildout —
and Raytheon just told you the demand is "surging."

-------------------------

_InvestorPlace Media_

MY #1 AI STOCK FOR 2026 (NAME & TICKER INSIDE)
[[link removed]]


I want to give you a free stock pick today — no strings attached, no
credit card required. This company's sales are up 28% year over year,
it holds over 30,000 patents in wireless and video technology, and it
just earned an A-rating in my proprietary Stock Grader system — the
same system that helped me flag Nvidia back in 2005 before its 82,000%
run and has identified the top-performing S&P 500 stock for 12 years
running. I've also identified three more AI stocks with the same
early-stage characteristics as Nvidia did in 2005.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE NAME AND TICKER OF MY #1 AI STOCK FOR 2026 IN
THIS FREE BRIEFING, COMPLETELY FREE.
[[link removed]]

-------------------------

2) THE SMARTER ANGLE: THE PRIMES ARE THE BILLBOARD — THE
UNDERFOLLOWED SUPPLIERS ARE THE CASH REGISTER

When Wall Street sees "Raytheon," it thinks the story ends there. It
doesn't.

NASAMS — and modern air defense broadly — pulls demand through a
web of components. The system integrates Raytheon's SENTINEL RADAR
with interceptors (AMRAAM, AMRAAM-ER, AIM-9X Sidewinder), a
command-and-control center, and the launch platforms. Kongsberg
Defence & Aerospace of Norway developed the fire distribution center
and canister launcher. The system can integrate with third-party
radars and interceptors — making it a "plug-and-play" air defense
architecture.

That modularity is the investment thesis. Every NASAMS unit sold to
one of 14 countries creates demand for radars, interceptors, command
software, secure communications, specialty electronics, and propulsion
— across multiple suppliers. And the AMRAAM-ER TRANSITION TO
FULL-RATE PRODUCTION means the interceptor pipeline is now running at
industrial scale, not development pace.

The catch: the primes can't ship what the supply chain can't produce.
Raytheon's own president acknowledged the company is "investing
heavily" to accelerate production. When the prime contractor says it
needs to invest to keep up with demand, the constraint is downstream
— in the components, the castings, the energetics, the specialty
electronics with long qualification cycles.

On the same day as the NASAMS contract, the Pentagon also awarded
$100+ MILLION in F-35 brake assembly heat sinks and MLRS engineering
services — the unglamorous sustainment work that keeps existing
fleets flying and firing. Every one of these contracts has a supplier
pyramid underneath it.

ONE COMPANY POSITIONED IN THE DEFENSE ELECTRONICS AND SENSOR LAYER
THAT FEEDS EVERY AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM:

Company: L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES (SYM: LHX)
Top-tier defense electronics — sensors, communications, electronic
warfare, and ISR systems. The components that sit inside NASAMS,
Patriot, THAAD, Aegis, and every other air defense architecture.

L3Harris is currently trading around $313.54. When 14 countries deploy
NASAMS, when PAC-3 is ramping across 17 nations, when 158 HBTSS
tracking satellites are being built, and when the AMRAAM-ER is
entering full-rate production — the electronics inside those systems
come from a small number of qualified suppliers. L3Harris is one of
them. The company's sensor, EW, and communications portfolio generates
demand pull across _every_ air defense program simultaneously. That's
the compounding dynamic Wall Street misses: it's not one contract.
It's the intersection of a dozen contracts, all pulling through the
same electronics layer.

BOTTOM LINE: The best defense upside is often one layer down from the
headlines — in the bottlenecks. When the prime admits it's investing
to keep up with demand, the supply chain underneath is where the
pricing power lives.

-------------------------

_Banyan Hill Publishing_
STRANGE ELON CRATES SPOTTED NEAR THE HOOVER DAM
[[link removed]]


Tesla is shipping thousands of strange white crates to critical
locations across America. 

[Hoover]
[[link removed]]

He says they are part of a new "super startup" that has nothing to do
with electric vehicles, space, social media, crypto, biotech, robots
or AI…

But it could go down as Elon's greatest ever disruption… 

GO HERE NOW FOR THE STORY — AND GET THE NAME AND TICKER OF ONE OF
ADAM'S TOP PICKS TO PLAY IT COMPLETELY FREE.
[[link removed]]

-------------------------

3) GEOPOLITICS ISN'T BACKGROUND NOISE ANYMORE — IT'S THE DEMAND
ENGINE

Kuwait doesn't buy NASAMS because it's trendy. It buys because the
neighborhood is dangerous.

The Strait of Hormuz crisis is now in its 14TH WEEK. Iran struck
FUJAIRAH — Kuwait's neighbor, the UAE's critical export terminal —
with loitering munitions during the Project Freedom debacle. Saudi
Arabia and the UAE were reportedly "moving closer to joining the
conflict" earlier in the war. Gulf states that spent decades relying
on U.S. naval presence as their primary shield are now writing
billion-dollar checks for their own integrated air defense.

That's the hard truth: the demand curve for air defense is being
pulled by real-world threats, not Washington's talking points. When a
country commits to integrated air defense, it doesn't stop at one
purchase. It expands. It trains. It maintains. It upgrades. It buys
interceptor reloads. It integrates command software. It builds
maintenance facilities.

That's recurring revenue dressed up as national security.

And it's happening everywhere simultaneously. Europe is mobilizing
€800+ BILLION through ReArm Europe. Taiwan just signed $6.6 BILLION
in arms (including NASAMS via the AMRAAM-ER connection). Global
defense spending hit $3 TRILLION — up 50% over five years. The World
Nuclear Association projects installed nuclear capacity doubling by
2040 — and nuclear facilities need air defense too.

ONE ETF THAT CAPTURES THE FULL ALLIED AIR DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL BUILDOUT:

ETF: ISHARES U.S. AEROSPACE & DEFENSE ETF (SYM: ITA)
Broad exposure to RTX, L3Harris, Lockheed, Northrop, General Dynamics,
and the rest of the defense industrial base — the companies
supplying 14 NASAMS nations, 17 PAC-3 nations, and the broader global
rearmament.

ITA owns the pyramid. RTX at the top (NASAMS, AMRAAM, Tomahawk,
PAC-3). L3Harris in the electronics layer (sensors, EW, satellites).
Northrop in space and hypersonics (GPI, HBTSS, B-21). Lockheed in
platforms and missiles (HIMARS, F-35, THAAD). General Dynamics in
ammunition and vehicles. When 14 countries standardize on NASAMS and
17 on PAC-3, the fleet economics benefit every name in the ETF.

BOTTOM LINE: Defense is shifting from discretionary spending to
baseline spending. Investors should treat it like an industrial
category, not a political headline.

-------------------------

_Weiss Ratings _

ELON’S BIG JUNE 30 ANNOUNCEMENT
[[link removed]]

Most investors are focused on the rumored June 30 SpaceX IPO — but
they're missing the bigger story. That date is actually the deadline
for an announcement tied to Elon Musk's secret "Project Unlimited,"
his master plan to save the AI industry. And there's one
under-the-radar tech firm — already responsible for shipping 5
billion critical components to SpaceX — that could become front-page
news the moment Wall Street starts digging.

GET THE NAME OF THIS "HIDDEN" STOCK BEFORE THE JUNE DEADLINE — ONCE
THE MEDIA CONNECTS THE DOTS, THE WINDOW SLAMS SHUT.
[[link removed]]

-------------------------

_Before You Go_

If the world is entering a decade where drones and missiles are cheap,
what does that make air defense?

A luxury? Or a utility?

[SMSBTMWIDEADV]
[[link removed]]

Our mailing address is:
Behind the Markets, LLC
4260 NW 1st Avenue, Suite 55
Boca Raton, FL 33431

Copyright © 2024 Behind the Markets, LLC, All rights reserved.
You're receiving this email as part of your subscription to Behind the
Markets. For more information about our privacy practices, please
review our Privacy Policy
[[link removed]]
or our Legal Notices.
[[link removed]]

Behind the Markets
[[link removed]]

Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]

invisiblelink
[[link removed]]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: n/a
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: n/a
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a