[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Fcis%2Fnew-from-the-center-for-immigration-studies-42726 Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Fcis%2Fnew-from-the-center-for-immigration-studies-42726)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
Immigration Newsmaker

[link removed]
The Center for Immigration Studies held an Immigration Newsmaker event featuring Andrew Veprek, Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM). ([link removed])

Parsing Immigration Policy Podcast
Panel Podcast: Can Democracies Deport Millions? ([link removed])
A rebroadcast of an International Network for Immigration Research (INIR) panel ([link removed])
Host: Mark Krikorian
Guests: Viktor Marsai, Director of the Budapest-based Migration Research Institute
Matt O’Brien, Deputy Executive Director, Federation for American Immigration Reform
Jim Robb, Vice President of Alliances, NumbersUSA
Parsing Immigration Policy, Episode 251
Commentary
Published in The American Mind:
The Case for Denaturalization ([link removed])
By Mark Krikorian
Excerpt: A vigorous, ongoing, and unapologetic commitment to denaturalization is an important part of the effort to restore integrity to U.S. citizenship. It is not about restricting citizenship gratuitously, but about demonstrating that becoming an American citizen is a high privilege that should be accorded only to those who meet its lofty standards.
Featured Posts
Revelations from the ICE FY 2027 Budget Overview ([link removed])
By Andrew R. Arthur
Excerpt: ICE’s FY 2027 congressional budget justification reveals that DHS is trying to fulfill the president’s promises to boost deportations and remove dangerous criminals from our communities, and that it has bold plans to expand both efforts in the immediate future. Now it’s time for Congress to either put up the funding to do so or change the law.

Ninth Circuit Blocks California’s ICE ID Law ([link removed])
By Andrew R. Arthur
Excerpt: A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a unanimous opinion this week enjoining the state of California from applying or enforcing section 10 of its “No Vigilantes Act”, which had attempted to force federal officers (read: “ICE”) to “visibly display identification” in the course of their duties. This law — more of a “message bill” used to attack the administration on a locally unpopular issue than an effort to address a real problem — was doomed from the start, but it’s good to receive assurance that the Constitution is still the law in the Golden State.
Has There Been a ‘Minneapolis Effect’ on Immigration Enforcement? ([link removed])
By Andrew R. Arthur
Excerpt: Immigration enforcement past could be key to ICE meeting its target of one million removals per year, provided the agency augments its in-custody arrests of criminal aliens with expanded “briefcase enforcement” at worksites. The original “Minneapolis Effect” hobbled local cops and fostered lawlessness; it needn’t have a similar deleterious impact on immigration enforcement.

11th Circuit Vacates District Court ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ Injunction ([link removed])
By Andrew R. Arthur
Excerpt: Trump first came to office without direct experience in federal politics, and during his first term didn’t give his immigration policies enough time for to percolate through the courts. He’s learned his lesson, which is why he was hot out of the gate on his second go-round, and why decisions like this are now going in his favor.
Donate ([link removed])

============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** [link removed] ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
** RSS ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2026 Center for Immigration Studies, All rights reserved.

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.

** View this e-mail in your browser. ([link removed])