Good morning. Power, accountability, and instability are the common thread through the day’s headlines — from a foiled act of political violence in Washington to shifting alliances over the Federal Reserve, and new questions about campaign finance transparency in a key Senate race.

A Manifesto and a Close Call in Washington

Cole Allen, a 31-year-old with an advanced technical background, allegedly sent a manifesto to family members just minutes before attempting to breach security at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner.

In the document, he outlined a plan to target high-ranking Trump administration officials, describing both intent and method with disturbing clarity. He claimed to have chosen ammunition designed to reduce the risk of collateral damage, while still acknowledging he might have to push through crowds to reach his targets.

After receiving the writings, Allen’s brother alerted authorities, setting off a chain of responses that included federal agents interviewing relatives who described a pattern of increasingly extreme political rhetoric.

The episode raises uncomfortable questions about warning signs and how someone could reportedly move through a high-security environment undetected while carrying multiple weapons.

A Reversal on the Federal Reserve Fight

On Capitol Hill, a political standoff appears to be dissolving. Senator Thom Tillis has reversed his earlier position and signaled support for President Trump’s expected Federal Reserve nominee, Kevin Warsh.

The shift follows assurances from the Department of Justice that an investigation into costly renovations at the Federal Reserve headquarters has been fully closed, removing a major point of contention. Tillis had previously warned he would oppose any nominee while the probe remained unresolved.

The broader backdrop is a long-running clash between the White House and current Fed leadership, particularly over interest rate policy and spending decisions. With this reversal, the path toward confirming a new chair looks clearer, though the underlying tensions between political leadership and the central bank remain unresolved.

Questions Over Campaign Spending Transparency in Michigan

Meanwhile, in Michigan, a rising Democratic Senate candidate is facing scrutiny over campaign finance disclosures.

A complaint filed with the Federal Election Commission alleges that State Senator Mallory McMorrow’s campaign failed to properly report more than $500,000 in digital advertising expenditures. The filings in question list significantly lower spending than what publicly available ad data appears to show.

The complaint suggests two possibilities: either major reporting errors or the potential involvement of a vendor covering costs in a way that could violate campaign finance rules. Both scenarios raise concerns about transparency — especially for a candidate who has publicly advocated for stricter campaign finance oversight.

McMorrow’s campaign has not yet fully addressed the discrepancy, but the issue lands at a critical moment in a competitive primary race where fundraising strength and financial credibility are key.