|
|
|
|
|
CEOs: Stakeholders, Shmakeholders
|
|
|
Back in 2019, when 181 corporate CEOs signed the Business Roundtable’s pledge to not maximize shareholder value quite so much if doing so hurt everybody else, Americans who were skeptical of our form of capitalism—or merely "Show me" Missouri types—viewed the pledge with a jaundiced eye. The purpose of the corporation, the CEOs avowed, had to be to benefit not just their shareholders (a group that happily included themselves) but
their consumers, their workers, and even the society at large. To which the only possible rational response was a grunted "Uh-huh."
Since they took that pledge, it’s worth noting that share buybacks have continued apace, funneling corporate revenues away from R&D, wages, and investment, and into shareholders’ ever-open mitts. It’s worth noting that not a single corporate signatory has proposed to add employee representatives to its board of directors, or even endorsed the House bill that would forbid these firms from compelling consumers and workers to submit to forced arbitration of grievances and forbidding them from taking those companies to court.
The latest confirmation of that "Uh-huh" grunt appeared last week in, of all places, The Wall Street Journal’s op-ed page, where the directors of the Harvard Law School’s Program on Corporate Governance unveiled the results of a survey they’d undertaken. Noting that anything even coming close to a reformulation of corporate purpose had to be approved by that corporation’s board of directors, they polled the signatory CEOs as to whether they had in fact even consulted their boards before signing the pledge. Of the 48 who answered their query,
47 had not—they’d just gone ahead and signed it.
"The most plausible explanation for the lack of board approval," the authors noted, "is that CEOs didn’t regard the statement as a commitment to make a major change in how their companies treat stakeholders." They further noted that JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, who chaired the Roundtable at the time, didn’t ask Morgan’s board to review or alter its guidelines, which state that the board "is responsible for the oversight of management on behalf of the Firm’s shareholders."
Which is to say, Godot will arrive quicker than top-down stakeholder capitalism. If Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are at all serious about rebuilding America’s middle class, it’ll be up to them, and the progressives, workers, activists, and
others who elect them and then make them do it.
|
|
|
|
|
Kamala’s Choice You may know the vice-presidential candidate by the enthusiastic response from the corridors of corporate power. But the story doesn’t have to end there. BY DAVID DAYEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright (C) 2020 The American Prospect. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
|