Data centers will consume 9% of U.S. electricity by 2030. The grid
wasn't built for it. $1.4 trillion in upgrades are coming — and your
neighbor's electric bill is paying for them. ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏
 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏
 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏
 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏
 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏
 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏
 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏
 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏
 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏
 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏




 

[Morning Watchlist]

_You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to BEHIND THE
MARKETS. If you no longer wish to receive these emails,
please unsubscribe
[[link removed]] here._

Prefer to view this content on our website? CLICK HERE.
[[link removed]]

-------------------------

$1.4 TRILLION FOR THE GRID. HALF THE BILL GOES TO YOUR NEIGHBOR.
HERE'S WHO GETS PAID.  

_A quick note from Behind the Markets_

Wall Street loves "themes." AI. Defense. Reshoring. Infrastructure.

But themes are just marketing unless you find the constraint.

The constraint is where the money gets forced in… and where the
public gets stuck paying the bill.

I'm watching a very simple setup: the grid is becoming the choke point
for AI and industrial policy — and the Street is still treating
utilities like sleepy bond proxies.

-------------------------

1) AI IS TURNING INTO A POWER RATIONING STORY (NOT A SOFTWARE STORY)

A new PowerLines report — covered by CBS and analyzed across Wall
Street last week — found that U.S. utility companies are planning
$1.4 TRILLION of investment over the next five years to upgrade the
power grid as the data center boom accelerates demand.

Let that number sink in.

That's up 27% from the same utilities' projections just one year ago,
when the figure was $1.1 trillion. It effectively DOUBLES the roughly
$700 billion utilities invested over the _entire previous decade_. And
the majority of the 51 investor-owned utilities surveyed — serving
250 MILLION U.S. customers — cited data centers as a top driver of
their capex plans.

Wall Street has spent two years selling you an "AI = software margins"
fairy tale. But the physical world is vetoing the hype. AI is becoming
a capacity problem: data centers need electricity, electricity needs
wires, transformers, substations, and permitting, and permitting needs
politics.

The MIT Energy Initiative estimated data centers consumed more than 4%
OF U.S. ELECTRICITY in 2023, and that figure could climb to 9% BY
2030. Deloitte's 2026 Power and Utilities outlook puts data center
demand at 176 GIGAWATTS BY 2035 — a fivefold increase from 2024. And
the North American Electric Reliability Corporation just revised
projected load growth from 6.1% TO 11.6% over the next decade.

That's not a software upgrade cycle. That's an industrial
transformation. JPMorgan projects $5.8 TRILLION in global grid
investment between 2026 and 2035.

ONE COMPANY AT THE CENTER OF THE PHYSICAL AI BUILDOUT:

Company: EATON CORPORATION (SYM: ETN)
A global power management company that manufactures the electrical
equipment — switchgear, transformers, circuit breakers, power
distribution units — that every data center and grid upgrade
requires.

Eaton is currently trading around  $406.98. The company sits at the
exact intersection of every demand driver: AI data center buildouts,
grid modernization, electrification, and weather hardening. When a
utility commits $102 billion in capex (Duke Energy's number) or $81
billion (Southern Company's), that money flows into physical
equipment. Eaton makes the equipment. Revenue has been growing in the
mid-teens, the backlog is at record levels, and the company's
electrical segment — where the grid buildout hits — is the
fastest-growing part of the business. This is the AI infrastructure
play that doesn't require you to pay 40x sales for software vaporware.

BOTTOM LINE: If you want to invest in AI without paying fantasy
multiples, follow the physical bottlenecks: power equipment, grid
modernization, and the companies that get paid when the pipe expands.

-------------------------

_American Alternative Assets_

THE MOVE WASHINGTON MADE IN 1934
[[link removed]]

[AAA Great Gold Reset]
[[link removed]]

In 1934, the government executed a legal maneuver that transferred
billions in wealth overnight.

Most Americans had no idea it was coming.

A small group who saw it early walked away wealthy.

Everyone else paid for it.

Trump has the same legal authority today. Advisors close to the
administration believe he's considering using it. If he does, the
transfer happens fast — and the window to be on the right side of it
is already closing.

We put together a free report on exactly what this move is, why the
timing points to now, and the one step ordinary Americans can take to
position themselves before it happens.

It costs nothing. Takes 30 seconds to request.

The people who moved early in 1934 didn't have a warning.

You do.

SEND ME THE FREE REPORT >
[[link removed]]

-------------------------

2) THE DIRTY SECRET: RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS ARE THE BAGHOLDERS

Here's the part you won't hear on TV.

PowerLines' analysis found that residential customers could end up
footing roughly $700 BILLION of that $1.4 trillion tab — nearly half
— across the 51 investor-owned utilities studied. That's not a typo.
Half of the largest coordinated utility investment in American history
could land on household electric bills.

Utilities don't print money. They file rate cases. And the EIA
projects average residential electricity prices will rise 5.1% this
year. CBS reported that 56 MILLION AMERICANS could face higher utility
bills due to rate hikes approved in 2025.

Now think politically. If households keep getting squeezed —
gasoline near $4.30, grocery prices elevated, wages lagging inflation
for lower-income earners — regulators eventually push back. And when
regulators push back, the utilities with sloppy capex plans get
punished while the utilities and suppliers with "must-have" projects
get approved.

Here's the contrarian investor move: stop treating "utility capex"
like one big blob. Break it into essential reliability upgrades (hard
to deny), AI and data-center interconnection buildouts (politically
sensitive), weather hardening (popular after disasters), and
executive-ego projects (easy targets for regulators to cut).

The winners won't just be "utilities." The winners will be the
companies that supply equipment the grid literally can't function
without — the transformers, the switchgear, the protection systems
— regardless of which specific utility project gets approved or
denied.

ONE COMPANY THAT BENEFITS FROM THE SPENDING REGARDLESS OF REGULATORY
OUTCOME:

Company: HUBBELL INCORPORATED (SYM: HUBB)
A manufacturer of electrical and utility solutions — transmission
and distribution components, connectors, surge arrestors, and grid
hardening equipment — with a direct line into the utility capex
cycle.

Hubbell is currently trading around  $539.99. The company's utility
solutions segment sells the components that utilities _must_ buy
whether the project is an AI data center interconnection or a basic
reliability upgrade. When regulators approve $1.4 trillion in spending
— even if they trim the edges — the transformers, connectors, and
protection equipment still get ordered. Hubbell has been posting
double-digit organic growth in its utility segment and operating
margins have been expanding. It's the infrastructure play that doesn't
need every utility project to get approved. It just needs the grid to
keep getting built. And the grid _has_ to keep getting built.

BOTTOM LINE: AI is becoming a stealth tax on households. The companies
that prove reliability — and supply equipment the grid can't run
without — get approved even when regulators get angry.

3) DEFENSE SPENDING IS QUIETLY SHIFTING TO A PRODUCTION RAMP (WATCH
THE SUPPLIER LAYER)

The market still treats defense like a headline trade. But defense is
becoming a throughput trade: can the industrial base actually build
the hardware fast enough?

Two contract releases this week tell the story:

A $234.7 MILLION award to Raytheon for the AMRAAM EXTENDED RANGE
transition to production — with multiple Foreign Military Sales
customers listed. That's the air-to-air missile that NATO allies have
been burning through at unprecedented rates. The "transition to
production" language matters — it means this program is moving from
development into factory output.

And an $850.4 MILLION Lockheed Martin Space modification tied to the
TRIDENT II (D5) LIFE EXTENSION program. That's the submarine-launched
ballistic missile that forms the backbone of the U.S. nuclear
deterrent. Life extension means the Pentagon is investing to keep
these systems operational for decades longer — which means sustained
demand for maintenance, components, and remanufacturing deep into the
2030s.

When defense demand shifts from "budget debate" to "deliver now," the
bottlenecks move downstream. Specialized components, propulsion
materials, testing equipment, maintenance and remanufacturing — the
sub-tier suppliers that don't show up on CNBC.

ONE COMPANY POSITIONED IN THE DEFENSE COMPONENTS LAYER WHERE
THROUGHPUT CONSTRAINTS CREATE PRICING POWER:

Company: MERCURY SYSTEMS (SYM: MRCY)
A mid-cap defense electronics company specializing in mission-critical
processing, sensor, and electronic warfare subsystems for platforms
including radar, missile defense, and electronic countermeasures.

Mercury is currently trading around  $82.71. The company builds the
ruggedized computing and sensor processing modules that go inside the
weapons systems the Pentagon is ramping. When AMRAAM production
accelerates and TRIDENT gets a life extension, the electronics inside
those systems need to be built, tested, and integrated — and Mercury
is one of a small number of companies qualified to do it. The stock
has been beaten down over the past two years on execution issues,
which means the valuation is compressed even as the demand environment
improves. If the production ramp is real — and $234 million for
AMRAAM ER and $850 million for TRIDENT suggest it is — Mercury sits
in the path of the spending.

BOTTOM LINE: The prime contractors get the headlines. The supplier
layer gets the pricing power when Washington needs output, not
speeches.

-------------------------

_Mode Mobile_

ELON SAYS AI WILL REPLACE JOBS. THIS COMPANY BUILT THE SOLUTION.
[[link removed]]

[mode mobile]
[[link removed]]

Elon Musk’s latest statement wasn’t subtle.

AI could force governments to introduce universal income.

That’s the future most people are preparing for.

MODE MOBILE IS ALREADY THERE.
[[link removed]]

-------------------------

4) THE SETUP FOR TOMORROW: DON'T IGNORE THE "SECOND ORDER" INFLATION
Wall Street is obsessed with CPI. But the next inflation wave may not
show up as "gasoline spikes." It may show up as regulated utility rate
hikes, capex-driven bills, and higher fixed costs for households that
can't be delayed or avoided.

That matters because it changes consumer behavior. A household can't
"delay" its power bill the way it delays buying a new iPhone. So if
electricity costs keep climbing — and a 5.1% INCREASE is already
baked into this year — the pressure leaks into everything else:
retail spending, credit card delinquencies, price sensitivity, and
political backlash.

The Beige Book already flagged it: consumers are getting more "price
sensitive," lower-income households are pulling back, and nine Fed
Districts reported tariff-driven cost increases being passed to
customers. Now layer a $1.4 TRILLION UTILITY BUILDOUT on top of that
— partially funded by rate hikes on the same consumers who are
already stretched.

This is where independent investors win: you don't have to be bullish
on everything. You just have to identify which business models crack
first when the monthly nut rises — and which ones collect the
payment regardless.

ONE ETF THAT CAPTURES THE GRID BUILDOUT WITHOUT SINGLE-NAME RISK:

ETF: INDUSTRIAL SELECT SECTOR SPDR FUND (SYM: XLI)
Broad exposure to U.S. industrials — including the electrical
equipment, defense, and infrastructure companies positioned to benefit
from the grid and defense buildouts simultaneously.

XLI holds Eaton, Honeywell, GE Aerospace, RTX, Caterpillar, and the
broader industrial base in a single instrument. The grid buildout and
defense production ramp are both industrial stories. When $1.4
trillion flows into power infrastructure and $1.5 trillion flows into
defense, the industrial sector captures the spending on both sides.
XLI lets you own the throughput without betting on a single utility's
rate case or a single defense program's timeline.

BOTTOM LINE: If AI is driving a power buildout, it's also driving a
consumer squeeze. That's not a reason to panic — it's a reason to be
selective. Own the constraint. Avoid the squeezed.

-------------------------

_Before You Go_

If AI is "the future," why are regulators and households getting
handed the bill — while the biggest beneficiaries book the upside?

That's the real fight.

-------------------------

_Wyatt Investment Research_

SPACEX WINS $6B IN MILITARY CONTRACTS?!
[[link removed]]

SpaceX is now the U.S. military's top launch provider.

The company has secured close to 6 billion dollars in contracts with
the Pentagon to launch satellites into orbit through the 2030s.

In January alone, the Space Force awarded SpaceX nine national
security space launch missions valued at 739 million dollars.

The missions include classified payloads for the National
Reconnaissance Office and satellites for the Space Development
Agency's missile warning network.

SpaceX is of the main defense contractors the Pentagon depends on.

That's why I'm claiming my SpaceX shares now, months before the IPO.

HERE'S HOW TO GET IN EARLY
[[link removed]]
(email required).

-------------------------

_Are there any other market stories you're following this week? What
other sectors of the market are you focusing on in 2026? Hit "reply"
to this email and let us know your thoughts!_

Our mailing address is:
Behind the Markets, LLC
4260 NW 1st Avenue, Suite 55
Boca Raton, FL 33431

Copyright © 2024 Behind the Markets, LLC, All rights reserved.
You're receiving this email as part of your subscription to Behind the
Markets. For more information about our privacy practices, please
review our Privacy Policy
[[link removed]]
or our Legal Notices.
[[link removed]]

Behind the Markets
[[link removed]]

Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]

invisiblelink
[[link removed]]