Speech paternalism is never viable in the public sphere. TikTok benefits from some oversight, but not a total ban.

View in browser ([link removed] )

August 10, 2020

Social Media on Phone ([link removed] )

There Is an Alternative to Banning TikTok ([link removed] )

Without a set of common international rules governing data, we will face a fragmented world, rife with uncertainty, that hurts both companies and consumers.

- The Lesson of TikTok ([link removed] )

By Huan Zhu

online-free-speech ([link removed] )

Speech Paternalism and Freedom of Speech ([link removed] )

Content moderators committed to liberalism face a conflict between their obligations to shareholders and to their liberal ideals. They should resolve that conflict in favor of liberal ideals.

- The Market for Speech Paternalism ([link removed] )

By John Samples

FEATURED ARTICLES

Stephen F. Williams R.I.P. ([link removed] )

We knew Judge Stephen F. Williams for his intellectual curiosity, his humor and warm personality, and his love of liberty.

Read more ([link removed] )

An Unconstitutional Action That Has Been “Ratified” Is Still Unconstitutional ([link removed] )

After the Supreme Court “fixed” the constitutional defect in the CFPB’s structure, the bureau shouldn’t get to just continue its previous regulatory enforcement.

Read more ([link removed] )

Transitioning from Medical Licensure to Certification: Architects Show a Way ([link removed] )

Ultimately, when pursuing any reforms, policymakers must remember that artificial shortages develop wherever there are barriers to entry by new providers.

Read more ([link removed] )

Sign Up For Other Cato Newsletters ([link removed] )

SUPPORT CATO ([link removed] )

Facebook ([link removed] )

LinkedIn ([link removed] )

Twitter ([link removed] )

Instagram ([link removed] )

YouTube ([link removed] )

Cato Institute, 1000 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20001, (202) 842-0200

Manage preferences ([link removed] )