Shine a spotlight on the real cost of learning losses
“Covid-19 related school closures are forcing countries even further off track in achieving their learning goals,” reports Brookings. “The students currently in school stand to lose $10 trillion in labor earnings over their work life. To get a sense of the magnitude, this sum is one-tenth of global GDP ... or twice the global annual public expenditure on primary and secondary education.”
Looking specifically at the United States, a study from McKinsey finds that learning losses and higher dropout rates “are not likely to be temporary shocks easily erased in the next academic year. On the contrary, we believe that they may translate into long-term harm for individuals and society.” World Bank Vice President for Human Development, Annette Dixon makes it plain: “Without rapid, decisive, and coordinated action, the crisis threatens to pose a huge setback to hard-won gains in human capital, irreversibly damaging the lifelong opportunities of millions of children.”
With the country grappling over how and when to open schools, we must also not ignore the very real consequences of keeping students out of school, particularly if the problems of student engagement with distance learning in the spring are replicated this fall. As Maria Hernandez, executive director of the nonprofit VELA that helps parents navigate special education for their kids, told Vox: For a lot of families of kids with disabilities, virtual learning this spring “meant nothing … It meant one phone call; it meant one packet.”
The immensity of learning loss is not something that can be solved by students and teachers working a little bit harder once schools are cleared to reopen. We have to do much better this fall than we did last spring, starting with the choices we make over the next few weeks.
Bring an emergency mindset to student learning
“While countries as different as South Korea, Thailand, Iceland, Slovakia, and Australia acted decisively to bend the curve of infections downward, the U.S. achieved merely a plateau in the spring, which changed to an appalling upward slope in the summer,” writes Ed Yong in The Atlantic. “The coronavirus found, exploited, and widened every inequity that the U.S. had to offer … Far from being a ‘great equalizer,’ the pandemic fell unevenly upon the U.S., taking advantage of injustices that had been brewing throughout the nation’s history.”
This is particularly true in education as a K-12 system that has never served low-income students and students of color particularly well in good times failed to adapt to a world without school buildings. While many school leaders hoped for a return to normal in the fall, it is clear that the challenges we confronted in the spring will return.
According to CRPE, in the past few weeks there has been a dramatic shift among the country’s largest school districts away from plans to reopen their school buildings. A similar analysis by the Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity finds 71 of the 120 largest school districts will start the year with a completely online program. At the same time, CRPE found that only 11 states “expect districts to put in place specific practices to support students in remote or blended learning models.”
In the spring, during the initial wave of school buildings closures, we argued for bridging the digital divide and dramatically improving distance learning through leadership and innovation. It is clear that many districts struggled to do so and will continue to struggle to provide quality distance learning this fall. While we must bring an emergency mindset to a new wave of federal, state and local investments in online learning programs, it is also essential that we support parents who are looking for different options.
That means looking beyond districts’ online programs to also support approaches that allow for small-group, in-person programs for the students who need it most: low-income students, those who are already below grade level, English Language Learners, and special education students. Districts should strive to provide this support but we should also embrace more entrepreneurial responses including private schools, microschools, pods, community centers, and homeschooling.