More good legal news
In the last newsletter we told you about a case we won at the Court of Appeal that involved four single working mothers who lost out because of the way their paydays interacted with universal credit.
We've now won another case about universal credit assessment periods. A woman called Sharon Pantellerisco had a job working 16 hours a week for the 'national living wage'. This would normally mean Sharon wasn’t subject to the benefit cap, but to the universal credit computer system it looked like she wasn’t earning enough to escape the cap – just because she is paid four-weekly and universal credit is worked out monthly. Sharon was penalised even though somebody doing exactly the same work, for the same number of hours at the same rate of pay, would be exempt from the benefit cap if their employer paid them monthly.
The Court agreed with us that this situation was irrational and unlawful.
Find out about all our cases at cpag.org.uk/legal