7 Aug 2020 | Facts and news from Full Fact

FACT CHECK

Videos of police officer being egged are not all they’re cracked up to be

This week, we came across several viral videos which show a group of children surrounding a prone police officer, while pelting him with eggs. 

There were a number of clues giving away the location of the video. One Facebook account gives the location as ‘Gravesend estate’, and there are signs visible in the background for a Kent-based estate agents. 

This suggests that, if the videos showed a real assault, it would be a Kent police matter. We contacted Kent police to ask if it was real, and a spokesperson confirmed there had been “no such incidents”.

They added that “the video is understood not to be genuine.”

Although it is not clear who created the videos, one was shared by a Facebook page owned by Trollstation, which has said it specialises in “bizarre and often surreal pranks” and describes its content as “intentionally provocative and controversial with the aim to get reactions from the general public in the name of comedic satire and entertainment.”

It was just a yolk
Can you help protect people from false information about the coronavirus? 

As the coronavirus pandemic rolls on and some cities face fresh lockdowns, we’re still facing a torrent of false and harmful information. Can you help protect people from being misled?

In the past week, we’ve fact checked false claims that Bill Gates is putting microchips in Covid-19 vaccines, and that ordinary face masks can damage people’s health.

At best, false content and pranks cause confusion. At worst they can lead people to make harmful decisions about their lives and communities. We need your immediate support to help stamp it out.

Monthly supporters are helping make sure false information is spotted and called out. 

But we face hundreds of posts like this. By giving just a few pounds a month, you can help make sure people have the information they need to make safe choices.

If you agree that good information matters can we count on your support today?
Yes, I’ll give a one off donation
Yes, I’ll start a monthly donation

FACT CHECK

No, most face masks can’t make you breathe in too much carbon dioxide

We’ve seen posts on Facebook claiming or implying that face masks can be harmful, because they force the wearer to breathe in too much carbon dioxide—which can lead to a condition known as hypercapnia.

For most masks and face coverings this is not true. Keith Neal, Emeritus Professor of the Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases at the University of Nottingham has described these claims as “malicious misinformation”.

In rare cases, this might happen when wearing certain medical respirators, known as N95 masks in the US and FFP2 masks here in the UK.

Paul Hunter, Professor in Medicine at the University of East Anglia, added: “There are studies that show, with an N95 mask, some people have an elevated blood carbon dioxide level, [but] that does not apply to ordinary surgical masks, and it sure as heck doesn’t apply to other types of face covering.”

How safe are masks?
Has our work made a difference? We’d love to hear from you

Have you ever changed your mind after reading a Full Fact article?

Perhaps we’ve helped you make a decision you wouldn’t have otherwise, or we’ve helped inform conversations you’ve had with friends or colleagues.

It’s thanks to our supporters and readers that we’re able to stand up for good information, publishing our regular fact checks and pushing for corrections. We’d love to hear from you. 
I‘d like to share my story

FACT CHECK

Shaun Bailey’s claim about Sadiq Khan’s congestion charge hike needs much more context

Last month, we spotted a dubious accusation made by Shaun Bailey, the Conservative candidate for London Mayor, against the current Mayor, Sadiq Khan.

He tweeted: “By deciding to increase the Congestion Charge, @SadiqKhan put politics above London’s economic recovery after Covid. Mr Mayor, just reverse it.”

It is true that London’s congestion charge has gone up, from its pre-pandemic level of £11.50 to £15. 

But Mr Bailey failed to mention that, as a condition of a £1.9 billion bailout for Transport for London, the government stipulated that Mr Khan had to not only reintroduce the charge (it was briefly suspended to support key workers), but also “urgently bring forward proposals to widen the scope and levels of these charges.”

Bailey and the bailout

FACT CHECK

Also this week...

Read our latest fact checks

Stop the spread of bad information

Find these updates useful? We'd be incredibly grateful if you could share our fact checks and help more people access good information.

Share Share
Tweet Tweet
Forward Forward
Share Share
Many thanks from the Full Fact team
Follow us Follow us
Donate Donate
Like us Like us
Follow us Follow us
Please note that we do not respond to replies to this email. If you have any questions or feedback please visit our contact form. 

You can find out how we’re funded here
Copyright © Full Fact 2020 - All rights reserved

A registered charity (no. 1158683) and a non-profit company (no. 6975984) limited by guarantee and registered in England and Wales.

Our mailing address is:
2 Carlton Gardens, London, SW1Y 5AA

We use Mailchimp to send you our emails and to see which articles are most popular. Read our privacy policy or Mailchimp's privacy policy

unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences