Even though prominent historians have found serious discrepancies in the reporting and assertions of the New York Times’s 1619 Project, it still...

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]
Hello John,

Even though prominent historians have found serious discrepancies ([link removed]) in the reporting and assertions of the New York Times’s 1619 Project, it still won staffer Nikole Hannah-Jones and the newspaper a Pulitzer Prize ([link removed]) . Now it is being incorporated into school history curricula ([link removed]) . And its premise that slavery and anti-black discrimination are intrinsic to the founding and evolution of America certainly helped catalyze ([link removed]) animosity that led to recent Black Lives Matter rioting.

Project 21 ([link removed]) Co-Chairman Horace Cooper ([link removed]) , in an interview with Steve Malzberg on RT America’s “Eat the Press” program, said this “number of inaccuracies… [and] mischaracterizations” calls the integrity of Jones and the Times into serious question.


[link removed]
WATCH VIDEO ([link removed])

Disputing the premise that American history actually began with the introduction of slavery in 1619 – more than 150 years before the Revolutionary War – Horace pointed out that colonists and subsequent generations of Americans were unique to slavery only in the fact that they actually ended it in the United States:

The more realistic point is that, instead of starting “America’s history” with the arrival of slaves – which, by the way, came… not as a result of Europeans conquering countries in Africa, but because of a vibrant and thriving slave trade that happened in Africa, and which continued happening in Africa. And, by the way, into the 21^st century, Africa is ground-zero for slavery.

None of their coverage discusses or understands or puts [this] in context. At the same time, America, the United States Constitution… created an amazing and exceptional idea. And within 75 years of the creation of that document, slavery was banned in all of the United States.

So this idea that this Project covers what really happened in America – this Project actually covers up what actually happened in America.

Also largely unreported is the radical nature of Jones herself.

While in college in 1995, Nicole Hannah (as she was then known) wrote ([link removed]) a letter to a Notre Dame publication that claimed “the white race is the biggest murderer, rapist, pillager and thief of the modern world.” She also called whites “bloodsuckers,” and wrote that Christopher Columbus was “no different than Hitler.” Subsequently, she expressed pride ([link removed]) that urban upheaval in the wake of the death of George Floyd was being called the “1619 riots.”

As the cost of the damage of the riots began to rise, Jones defended ([link removed]) them by saying that “[d]estroying property, which can be replaced, is not violence.” Horace took exception to her radicalism:

This is amazing.

It started with her bigotry. And the whole idea of the 1619 Project is imbued with this kind of bigotry. The idea that there are hundreds – if not thousands – of Americans all across the country today who have lost their livelihoods. Property has been destroyed. The idea that should not be of consequence…

Explaining that there are significant repercussions to the rioting that will be felt for years to come, particularly in black communities where there was significant damage ([link removed]) to businesses, Horace added:

There’s a meme ([link removed]) going around that people have insurance. Has anybody heard of COVID-19 ([link removed]) ?

A lot of folks lost their income, and they had to stop paying ([link removed]) their insurance. Their property actually isn’t going to be replaced.

This evil idea is being promoted by the genesis [of the 1619 Project].

At the New York Times annual shareholder meeting ([link removed]) in April, the National Center’s Project 21 and Free Enterprise Project ([link removed]) urged the newspaper to “go back and correct the record with the same vigor with which it distorted it” and ensure school curricula is factual. But Times Publisher A.G. Sulzberger called the debate a “real value” and demurred on responsibility by saying that “we’ve tried hard… to encourage dialogue.”
READ ON OUR WEBSITE ([link removed])
SHARE THIS EMAIL
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed] https%3A%2F%2Fnationalcenter.org%2Fproject21%2F2020%2F08%2F05%2F1619-project-rebuked-for-radical-riot-causing-inaccuracies%2F Tweet ([link removed] https%3A%2F%2Fnationalcenter.org%2Fproject21%2F2020%2F08%2F05%2F1619-project-rebuked-for-radical-riot-causing-inaccuracies%2F)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
READ MORE FROM THE NATIONAL CENTER ([link removed])

The National Center for Public Policy Research is a communications and research foundation supportive of a strong national defense and dedicated to providing free market solutions to today’s public policy problems. We believe that the principles of a free market, individual liberty and personal responsibility provide the greatest hope for meeting the challenges facing America in the 21st century.
Help support The National Center
A gift to The National Center will be used to fund critically-important programs not offered by any other group, including:
* The Free Enterprise Project (FEP), the liberty movement’s only full-service shareholder and activism group that’s effective in pushing corporate America to the right;
* Project 21, the liberty movement’s only public relations agency for black conservatives and libertarians that has already created over 40,000 media opportunities;
* The Environment and Enterprise Institute (EEI), which counters misinformation being spread by the environmental left.

DONATE NOW ([link removed])

============================================================
CONNECT WITH US
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2020 The National Center for Public Policy Research, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.

Our mailing address is:
The National Center for Public Policy Research
20 F Street NW
Suite 700
Washington, DC 20001
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.