Dear Supporter,
Damning report on Provincial Growth Fund confirms pork barrelling,
conflicts, and worse
A damning
new report from the Auditor-General has confirmed what your humble
Taxpayers' Union has been saying about the Provincial Growth
Fund all along. He found failing processes with regards to the
approval of grants, managing conflicts of interests, and tracking of
performance.
The Auditor-General said:
It was not always clear from the
documentation why certain projects were considered for funding from
this part of the Fund. . . it was difficult to find evidence
of how projects had fully met the normal criteria for the
Fund.
When the Auditor-General with all his expertise does a deep dive
into the application documents and still can’t figure out why
recipients were granted funding, we have a serious problem.
The Auditor-General goes on:
In my view, in the interests of the
transparency of the overall process, it is important for the public
and Parliament to have better visibility of how all the parts of the
Fund operate
We couldn’t agree more. Post COVID-19, every dollar handed out from
the fund is borrowed from future generations of taxpayers. New
Zealanders deserve more information to shed light on whether Shane
Jones’s slush fund justifies a mortgage on our future.
The report’s breakdown of spending by region shows the real
motivation behind the Provincial Growth Fund. The region to
receive the most funding – half a billion dollars and counting – is
Northland. That’s a $3,671 election bribe for every man, woman, and
child in the region that New Zealand First is targeting for
votes. It is banana republic stuff and is a blot on New
Zealand’s reputation for having incorruptible institutions.
Labour candidate does the right thing. But what about
National in Port Hills?
The Labour Party’s new Palmerston North candidate, Tangi Utikere
(pictured left), is the City's deputy mayor.
Last week we called on Mr Utikere to give up his ratepayer-funded
salary – and
now he’s agreed.
Good on him. The amount of money saved might be small in the scheme
of things, but it's an important principle: ratepayers should not be
forced to pay a councillor to campaign full time for a political party
they may not support. It also sends the right message about the
attitude Tangi Utikere will bring to Parliament when it comes to the
use of public funds.
Meanwhile, National’s candidate in Port Hills – Catherine
Chu, a Christchurch City Councillor – continues to take a $114,000
salary from ratepayers while she campaigns, on top of a
taxpayer-funded salary as a DHB member! As
we told The
Press, ratepayers deserve more focus from their local
representatives.
Taxpayer Briefing: The Green Party Manifesto
Our Analyst, Neil Miller, was tasked with trawling through the
Green Party's 52-page manifesto so you don't have to.
Highlights/lowlights include:
-
A "wealth" tax – i.e. a tax on retirement, housing,
entrepreneurship, and death for the average Auckland homeowner.
-
Not one, but two more income tax brackets above 33%.
-
"Investigating" a sugar tax.
-
A "water only" policy for sports clubs.
-
Taxpayer-funded snorkeling lessons (yes, seriously).
Clear
here to read Neil's full briefing for taxpayers.
AJ Hackett Bungy process could set chilling
precedent
Crux reports
that MBIE handed over taxpayer money to AJ Hackett Bungy without even
confirming that private funding wasn't available.
As one of New Zealand's most successful tourism operators, AJ
Hackett Bungy would have survived without corporate welfare. It is
completely unacceptable that it received a taxpayer-funded handout of
$5,100,000 (and access to a further loan of the same amount) while
smaller, less well-known and less politically connected businesses
continue to struggle and fail.
The least taxpayers expect is a thorough process to make sure
alternatives are unavailable before public funding is provided. In
this case, AJ Hackett Bungy simply stated that it had not received a
response from its bank – incredibly, that single line was enough to be
given a cool $5 million.
We say Tourism Minister Kelvin Davis must signal to the wider
corporate community that this is not the standard process. Otherwise,
businesses may pursue a strategy of making merely token attempts to
secure private funding (or making no such attempts at all) before
asking for a handout.
AJ Hackett’s reputation should not be tainted by
handout
In our annual Jonesie
Waste Awards, we nominated the handout given to AJ Hackett Bungy
as an example of unfair corporate welfare, joking that AJ Hackett is
the only tourism operator in Queenstown who doesn’t want to throw
Tourism Minister Kelvin Davis off a bridge.
An associate of Mr Hackett's family has since contacted us to
clarify that AJ Hackett separated from his company’s New Zealand
operations several years ago. He had no involvement with the lobbying
for taxpayer funding.
It’s a shame that an iconic New Zealand innovator should have his
reputation tarnished, through no fault of his own, as a result of a
politically-motivated handout. The Taxpayers’
Union apologises to Mr Hackett, having now learned he is not
liable for payments given to the company that bears his
name.
If only AJ Hackett Bungy the company valued their reputation as
much as Mr Hackett's family, they wouldn't have attempted this cosy
special deal.
No Marama, tax is not "love"
We've laughed before about commentators claiming that "tax is
love". But now our politicians are saying it too.
Here's our response to Green Party co-Leader Marama Davidson, who
made
the claim on Q&A:
Marama Davidson is asking New
Zealanders struggling to pay higher income taxes, fuel taxes, rubbish
taxes, and tobacco taxes, to accept all this with a warm feeling of
affection. That’s not just delusional, it’s offensive.
Frankly this is a grotesque,
masochistic, Orwellian distortion of language. The Green Party should
be ashamed.
Tax punishes productive New
Zealanders and takes food off the table. For those who have
recently lost their jobs, tax paid is the difference between meeting
mortgage payments and losing the house. And then, come election time,
politicians fritter away our hard-earned taxes on political bribes to
serve their own re-election chances.
Debt Monster gets a selfie with the Prime Minister
It's been a busy couple of weeks for the Debt Monster. Here he is
posing with the Prime Minister at a campaign event in Naenae:
The Debt Monster is a big fan of Jacinda. He even woke up early to
meet her and Grant Robertson for a breakfast event at Te Papa! Click
here to watch the short clip on Facebook.
The Debt Monster is our malevolent symbol of the cost of
politicians' borrowing – set to reach $109,000 per Kiwi household in
2024.
He's not party political – he loves to stalk any politician who
vies for votes with taxpayer money. Look at this photo from Judith
Collins's recent event in Petone:
Judith seemed to see the funny side. She
even posted on Facebook about the encounter.
The Debt monster also visited New Zealand First's campaign launch
in Auckland:
Who's that in the background? Another Debt Monster??
He was hoping to hear Winston Peters' big speech, but New Zealand
First staff
members wouldn't let him in.
The Debt Monster will be an inescapable presence on the campaign
trail. We won't let politicians forget that their promises are paid
for by future generations of taxpayers.
Have a great week,
|
Louis
Houlbrooke Campaigns Manager New Zealand Taxpayers'
Union
|
|