From NDRC Survey Team <[email protected]>
Subject When Kagan dissented in Rucho v. Common Cause
Date August 1, 2020 9:06 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Friend,

In her dissent in Rucho v. Common Cause, the partisan gerrymandering case that the Supreme Court decided in 2019, Justice Elena Kagan noted that "gerrymandering is, as so many Justices have emphasized before, anti-democratic in the most profound sense."

Do you agree?

YES >>> [link removed]
NO >>> [link removed]

While Justice Kagan's entire dissent is worth reading for its insightful analysis of the harm gerrymandering causes to our democracy, it's 72 pages long, so we won't ask you to do that. Instead, will you take our short survey and let us know which of her points you agree with?

>>> [link removed]

Thanks,
NDRC Survey Team



DONATE: [link removed]




Paid for by the National Democratic Redistricting PAC, [link removed].
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.

This email was sent to [email protected].

To unsubscribe, go to:
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis