Take a look at some of our recent research on the potential impact of Bostock v. Clayton County on state non-discrimination laws, HIV testing and PrEP use among transgender adults, and the reproductive needs of LBT women. Also: Join us for a webinar today at noon PT on the Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County and what it means for the future of LGBT rights. 
NEW RESEARCH

Legal protections for LGBT people after Bostock v. Clayton County
Millions of LGBT people could gain additional non-discrimination protections if courts interpret state laws consistent with the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County. Our new study analyzed state sex non-discrimination laws in states without statutes that expressly bar discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. It also estimated the number of LGBT people in each state who stand to gain protections under these laws.
Read more

Only 3% of sexually active transgender people use PrEP

The first study to estimate the use of PrEP among transgender people using a national probability sample in the United States found that only 3% of transgender adults in the U.S. who are at high risk for HIV infection use PrEP. In addition, 23% of transgender people who are at high risk for HIV infection have never been tested for HIV, while 46% are tested for HIV annually, as recommended by the CDC.
Read more

Reproductive health of bisexual women and girls needs greater attention

Over 48 million people of reproductive age assigned female sex at birth currently use contraceptives, including up to 3.9 million cisgender sexual minority women and transgender adults. Among women ages 15-44, the odds of an unwanted pregnancy are 1.75 times greater for bisexually identified women than their heterosexual peers.
Read More
WILLIAMS NEWS

Join our webinar on Bostock and the future of LGBT rights
JULY 31  |  NOON - 1PM PT
Our distinguished panel, including Alphonso David, Cary Franklin, Andrea Marra, and Brad Sears, will examine the landmark Bostock v. Clayton County decision, explore the implications for other state and federal non-discrimination laws, and discuss comments from one of the plaintiff’s family members. This webinar is co-sponsored by the Williams Institute and UCLA School of Law.
RSVP for the Webinar
The Williams Institute
UCLA School of Law
Box 951476
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
[email protected]
williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu
Unsubscribe






This email was sent to [email protected]
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
The Williams Institute UCLA School of Law · 1060 Veteran Ave · Suite 134 · Los Angeles, CA 90095-7092 · USA