We had just laid out a plan to grow Democracy Docket’s headcount by nearly a third in 2026 when news broke that the owner of the Washington Post had fired roughly the same proportion of its staff. We soon learned that more than 300 journalists were affected.
The tragedy of that day was not limited to those who lost their jobs. Someone once told me that Washington, D.C., is a company town and that the Post is its newspaper. In a single day, people living in and around the nation’s capital lost most of their local news coverage and all of their sports reporting.
It is true that the Post’s dominance in the city has been declining for years. In the 1990s, Roll Call challenged its coverage of Congress. Later, The Hill, Hotline and various political tip sheets chipped away at its market share. Ultimately, however, it was the rise of Politico that eroded much of the Post’s natural advantage by redefining political coverage for a new generation of readers.
When Jeff Bezos bought the Post in 2013, it appeared that its problems had been solved. A billionaire owner seemed willing to uphold the institution’s traditions and invest in its future. In 2017, the Post adopted the slogan “Democracy Dies in Darkness,” and for much of the first Trump term, it felt as though Bezos was committed to keeping democracy’s lights on.
Then, in the run-up to the 2024 election, that changed. The Post’s leadership made a series of editorial decisions that alienated subscribers — and, with them, its primary source of revenue.
The Post was not alone. Many legacy media outlets betrayed the trust of their readers and viewers.
They also failed to recognize a fundamental shift: News consumers wanted deeper coverage of the few topics they cared most about, and they were willing to pay more for it than for broad, superficial reporting that tried to cover everything.
I noticed that trend in my own life. As early as 2019, I found myself seeking out individual authoritative voices rather than news brands. By 2020, I was convinced there was an underserved community that wanted deeper, smarter and more fearless coverage of what was happening to voting and elections in the courts.