View this post on the web at [link removed]

This week, the Washington Post announced [ [link removed] ] dramatic layoffs that will sharply reduce the size of its newsroom and affect nearly every department. International, metro, sports, editing, and specialty desks are all being cut as the paper attempts to stem mounting financial losses.
The reaction from journalists and labor unions was swift and emotional. Statements accused ownership of abandoning the paper’s historic mission. Some went further, arguing that the Post’s owner, Jeff Bezos, should step aside if he is no longer willing to “invest” in the institution.
That framing may be comforting inside the newsroom. It is also deeply misleading.
Because the reality facing the Washington Post is not unique. It is not the result of one owner’s priorities. And it is not the product of a single bad year.
It is the reality confronting every print-based news organization in America.
The myth of “investment” in legacy media
When unions and journalists say Bezos should keep “investing,” what they really mean is continuing to subsidize structural losses indefinitely.
That is not an investment. That is life support.
The Washington Post has reportedly lost close to $100 million in recent years. Its daily circulation has collapsed from roughly 250,000 in 2020 to under 100,000 today. Digital subscriptions surged briefly during election cycles and political flashpoints, then evaporated just as quickly when trust eroded.
No serious business model can survive on the assumption that a wealthy owner will absorb unlimited losses forever.
At some point, math asserts itself.
The uncomfortable truth journalists avoid
Most coverage of the Post’s downsizing treats the problem as a technological issue. Advertising moved online. Social media fragmented attention. Readers no longer consume news the way they once did.
All true. Still incomplete.
What is almost never discussed is the collapse of reader trust, particularly in daily publications that increasingly confuse reporting with persuasion.
Millions of readers do not want to pay money to be lectured. They do not want to open a news app and be told, implicitly or explicitly, that they are morally defective, politically dangerous, ignorant, or part of a fascist fringe simply because they hold dissenting views.
That fatigue cuts across ideology. It applies to the left and the right.
People are willing to tolerate bias when it is honest and labeled. What they reject is bias injected into supposedly neutral reporting, especially when they are asked to pay for it.
That problem is routinely understated, and it matters more than most newsroom leaders will admit.
Why people tolerate bias online but not in print
One of the great ironies of modern media is that people flock to online news even when they know it is slanted.
Why?
Because they are not being billed for it.
If a reader disagrees with an editorial frame on X, Substack, YouTube, or an independent blog, they can leave instantly. There is no subscription guilt, no sunk cost, no sense of being trapped in a moral scolding they paid to receive.
Legacy newspapers ask readers to open their wallets for a product that increasingly blends news with judgment. In a competitive market with endless alternatives, that is a losing proposition.
The internet did not just break the advertising model. It broke the patience model.
The monopoly mindset never adjusted
For decades, large metro papers operated as near-monopolies. If you lived in a city, you had one dominant paper. Classifieds paid the bills. Scarcity protected authority.
That world is gone.
Yet many newsrooms kept the same staffing levels, the same international footprint, the same institutional assumptions, long after the economic foundation disappeared.
The Washington Post’s leadership finally acknowledged this when it admitted the paper was still structured like a monopoly newspaper in a non-monopoly world.
That recognition came late, but it is not wrong.
Bezos is not the story. The system is.
It is convenient to personalize the crisis by pointing at Bezos. It avoids harder questions about journalism itself.
But even if Bezos sold tomorrow, the next owner would face the same facts:
Shrinking readership
Fragmented attention
High labor costs
Low willingness to pay
Deep skepticism toward ideological framing
No owner, billionaire or otherwise, can reverse those forces with sentiment alone.
The real question is not who owns the Washington Post. It is whether legacy journalism is willing to relearn humility, separate reporting from advocacy, and rebuild trust with readers who no longer accept lectures disguised as news.
Until that happens, layoffs will continue. Not just in Washington, but everywhere.
What Legacy Media Forgot About Trust
At Christian Action Network, we report the facts. We lay out what happened, who was involved, and why it matters. Do we lean in a political direction? Of course we do.
The difference is that our readers know that from the start. We do not hide our worldview, and we do not deceive readers by smuggling perspective into reporting while pretending to be neutral.
We are explicit about our position and disciplined about our facts.
That discipline is not optional. Our work is scrutinized relentlessly by legacy media outlets eager to find even the smallest factual error. The microscope they hold over us is unforgiving, and it forces rigor.
Each of our stories is fact-checked by three separate agencies before we post. We pass the truth threshold because we have to.
People voluntarily support Christian Action Network because they trust us.
That trust was earned through transparency, accuracy, and honesty about perspective. Much of legacy media lost that trust while refusing to acknowledge that paying subscribers now hold them to the same standard they once imposed on others.
The layoffs we are witnessing are not a mystery. They are the market’s verdict on credibility, and credibility cannot survive where humility has been replaced by moral pretense.
Martin Mawyer is the President of Christian Action Network, host of the “Shout Out Patriots” podcast, and author of When Evil Stops Hiding [ [link removed] ]. For more action alerts, cultural commentary, and real-world campaigns defending faith, family, and freedom, subscribe to Patriot Majority Report. [ [link removed] ]

Unsubscribe [link removed]?