View this email in your browser
An update from FactCheck.org 

The Facts on the Vaccines the CDC No Longer Recommends for All Kids

Last week, U.S. health officials slashed the vaccine schedule, doing away with recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that all kids get vaccines against rotavirus, meningococcal disease, influenza and hepatitis A. The CDC previously had ended universal childhood recommendations for vaccination against hepatitis B and COVID-19, as we’ve covered before.

The CDC now recommends all children receive vaccines targeting 11 diseases, down from 17 just a few months ago.

The vaccines dropped from the universal schedule are recommended under shared clinical decision-making, a sometimes-confusing designation that was previously uncommonly used. The vaccines will still be covered by insurance after a discussion with a health care provider but are no longer recommended for all.

Our SciCheck team, Jessica McDonald and Kate Yandell, wrote about the often-misleading rationales officials gave for the weakened recommendations.

For example, officials claimed in a Jan. 5 memo — amid a so-far unusually bad flu season — that flu vaccines should not be universally recommended because they had not been proven to prevent hospitalization or death in children in randomized controlled trials. 

But this “ignores a large body of evidence that influenza vaccines are effective in children, including substantial protection against severe illness,” Dr. Edward Belongia, a global expert on flu vaccine effectiveness who retired from the Marshfield Clinic Research Institute in Wisconsin last year, told Jessie. He also explained that clinical trials “are not powered to detect rare outcomes such as hospitalization and death.”

In the case of rotavirus — which causes vomiting, diarrhea and fever — the memo also downplayed data showing that vaccines have steeply cut hospitalizations, formerly affecting 55,000 to 77,000 children per year. Today, “most pediatric residents at our hospital have never seen an inpatient with rotavirus dehydration,” Dr. Paul Offit, a pediatrician and vaccine expert at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, told Kate.

The memo also misled on the safety of the vaccines, implying that the only way to establish vaccine safety is through a specific type of placebo-controlled randomized trial. This is an anti-vaccine trope that relies on narrowly defining placebos while also ignoring the other types of studies that can establish vaccine safety.

For more, see: “The Facts on the Vaccines the CDC No Longer Recommends for All Kids.”

IN THE NEWS
President Donald Trump threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act to send federal military forces to Minneapolis in response to protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement actions in the city. Under the Posse Comitatus Act, federal military forces can’t perform civilian law enforcement tasks. But the Insurrection Act provides an exception to this, and the president can invoke it in some circumstances, even over the objections of governors. Read more: "The Threat of the Insurrection Act in Minnesota." 
FEATURED FACTS
In 2007, Venezuela's government required foreign oil companies to sign new contracts granting its state-owned oil and gas company majority control of their oil projects in the country. Companies refusing these terms had their oil-related assets there seized. Exxon Mobil and ConocoPhillips, two U.S. oil companies, rejected the demands and ceased operations in Venezuela. Chevron, another American company, accepted the terms and continues to produce oil in the country. Read more: "Explaining Trump's Claim That Venezuela 'Stole' U.S. Oil."
WORTHY OF NOTE
As we said in our lead item, the CDC dropped six vaccines from universal recommendations for all children. The vaccines are now recommended under shared clinical decision-making, a term that sparks some confusion among the public, according to surveys done by the University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg Public Policy Center, our parent organization. 

Shared clinical decision-making means that people may still get a vaccine after a discussion with a health care provider. About two-thirds, or 68%, of respondents in an August 2025 survey of 1,699 U.S. adults got that basic definition right. (They selected the definition: "You and your health care provider should review your medical history before deciding whether the vaccine is right for you.")

But 42% also said the term meant it was up to them whether to consult with a health care provider about getting a vaccine, while about a quarter said the term meant they should discuss a vaccine with their families (neither of which is a correct definition of the term).  

In a December APPC survey, 1,637 adults were asked about the meaning of "health care provider." Respondents overwhelmingly chose "physician" (86%), but only 33% knew that a pharmacist also qualified as a "health care provider" under shared clinical decision-making. 

See APPC's press release and the details on the survey questions and results for more information. 

Wrapping Up

Here's what else we've got for you this week:

  • Politicians Reach Different Conclusions on Minnesota Shooting Video
    The Trump administration and some Democrats have drawn divergent conclusions from bystander video of the fatal shooting of a woman in Minnesota by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent. How can one side say the agent was “recklessly using power” and the other determine he “fired defensive shots”? Experts told us it’s common for people to view the same video differently, and that the early evidence isn’t enough to reach definitive conclusions.
Y lo que publicamos en español (English versions are accessible in each story):
  • Explicando la afirmación de Trump de que Venezuela “robó” petróleo de EE. UU.
    El presidente Donald Trump dijo que una de las razones por las que Estados Unidos “gobernará” a Venezuela y controlará “indefinidamente” sus ventas de petróleo es porque “hace años” Venezuela “nos quitó el petróleo” y “robó nuestros activos”. Eso es una simplificación excesiva de lo que sucedió cuando Venezuela asumió un mayor control de su sector energético.

     
  • Políticos llegan a diferentes conclusiones con el video del tiroteo en Minnesota
    La administración Trump y algunos demócratas llegaron a conclusiones divergentes a partir del video de testigos del tiroteo fatal de una mujer en Minnesota a manos de un agente del Servicio de Inmigración y Control de Aduanas (ICE, por sus siglas en inglés). ¿Cómo es posible que un lado afirme que el agente “hizo uso imprudente de su poder” y el otro determine que “disparó a la defensiva”? Varios expertos nos dijeron que es común que las personas vean el mismo video de manera diferente, y que la evidencia preliminar no es suficiente para llegar a conclusiones definitivas.
Do you like FactCheck.Weekly? Share it with a friend! They can subscribe here.
Donate to Support Our Work
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Threads
YouTube
TikTok
WhatsApp
We'll show up in your inbox every Friday with this fact-focused rundown. But you can message us any day of the week with questions or comments: [email protected].
Copyright © 2026 FactCheck.org, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
FactCheck.org
Annenberg Public Policy Center
P.O. Box 58100
Philadelphia, PA 19102

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.






This email was sent to [email protected]
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
FactCheck.org: A Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center · P.O. Box 58100 · Philadelphia, Pa 19102 · USA