The recent death of Renee Good calls to attention the scale and consequences of U.S. immigration enforcement spending. Since the creation of the Department of Homeland Security in 2003, the federal government has spent an estimated $409 billion on immigration enforcement, with tens of billions more devoted to border barriers, detention, and surveillance.
That spending has produced record staffing levels, expanded fencing, and growing detention capacity, even as deaths associated with detention and enforcement continue to rise. All while funding for enforcement has far outpaced investment in immigration courts and humanitarian systems—raising serious questions about what this spending is achieving. Read more: The Cost of Immigration Enforcement and Border Security |
Right before Christmas, the American Immigration Council and Just Futures Law filed a FOIA request seeking transparency into USCIS’s use of “anti-Americanism” and social media screening in immigration benefit decisions.
In April 2025, USCIS announced it would consider certain online activity as a discretionary factor in adjudications, but did not clearly define what qualifies as “anti-Americanism.” Without clear standards, these policies risk subjective decision-making, inconsistent outcomes, and denials based on protected speech or beliefs. The FOIA request seeks policies, training materials, data, and legal guidance to clarify how these practices are being implemented and how they affect applicants.
Read more: Council and Just Futures Law File FOIA Request Seeking Information on USCIS’ Implementation of “Anti-Americanism” in Adjudicating Benefit Applications |