[link removed]
WEEK OF JANUARY 04, 2026
** This Week on Moral Foundations of the American Republic
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]
** What Begins Where the Declaration Ends? ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
From its origins as a revolutionary announcement to its long afterlife as a moral touchstone, the Declaration of Independence has shaped the American republic through principle rather than law. By articulating a theory of human equality, natural rights, and government by consent, it offered a standard by which later generations could assess both the justice and the failures of their political order. Over time, Americans returned to its claims not as settled conclusions, but as enduring obligations that grounded a shared civic identity and framed the continuing work of self government.
Read Now ([link removed])
** As the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence approaches in 2026, what do enduring debates over its meaning reveal about the moral foundations required to sustain a diverse and self-governing republic?
------------------------------------------------------------
** “Yet through all the gloom I can see the rays of ravishing light and glory. I can see that the end is more than worth all the means, and that posterity will triumph in that day’s transaction.”
------------------------------------------------------------
** – John Adams
------------------------------------------------------------
This week’s selections invite readers to reconsider the Declaration of Independence not as a settled creed, but as a moral standard that has guided and unsettled the American republic from its founding to the present. The essays explore how the Declaration’s principles of equality, natural rights, and consent have been invoked, contested, and reinterpreted across changing political and social circumstances, shaping debates over justice, legitimacy, and self-government. These reflections consider the power of ideas alongside the limits of human nature and political necessity, tracing how moral principle and civic responsibility have remained in productive tensions that are central to the endurance of a free society.
** Articles
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]
** Anything But Compromising ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Christa Dierksheide, A Call to Liberty ([link removed])
Reading the Declaration of Independence in the context of a wartime civil conflict, the essay contends that the document was less a compromised statement of abstract ideals than a forceful act of political mobilization. By establishing moral authority and collective purpose, it helped create the unity and capacity necessary for independence, while framing equality as a foundational principle to be pursued over time through experience and republican self-government.
[link removed]
** Adam Smith's 'Coarse Clay' Political Realism ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Ryan Griffiths, Adam Smith Works ([link removed])
Situating Adam Smith’s discussion of religious establishment in Book V of The Wealth of Nations, this lecture presents Smith as a political realist who accepts that a free society must be designed for imperfect people. Rather than treating Smith’s limits on liberty as ad hoc, it highlights a consistent priority of stability over time and justice, especially in the risky alignment of persuasion and coercion.
** Aiming at Ordered Liberty ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Jeffrey Bristol, Law & Liberty ([link removed])
Examining claims that the American Constitution is ordered toward a singular vision of the Common Good, this essay argues instead that the republic’s final purpose is ordered liberty. Drawing on Aristotelian causes and the Founders’ design, it contends that American institutions exist not to impose the good, but to enable individuals and communities to pursue it for themselves.
** Eicholz, Jefferson, and the Declaration of Independence ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Lucas E. Morel, Online Library of Liberty ([link removed])
Placing Thomas Jefferson’s writings before and after the Declaration of Independence in historical context, the piece argues that apparent tensions in his thought reflect moral deliberation rather than hypocrisy or bad faith. By reading the Declaration alongside A Summary View of the Rights of British America and Notes on the State of Virginia, it presents Jefferson as consistently committed to natural rights and consent while confronting the political limits of his time.
** Adam Smith on Capitalism and the Common Good ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Erik W. Matson, Econlib ([link removed])
Reflecting on contemporary calls for a “common good capitalism,” the argument turns to Adam Smith to show that economic liberty itself is a central moral foundation of a free society. By emphasizing the limits of human knowledge, the benefits of the division of labor, and the duties of justice under law, it presents Smith’s system of natural liberty as one that serves the common good indirectly through individual choice and responsibility rather than centralized direction.
** Podcasts
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]
** Philip Hamburger on the Threats of the Administrative State ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
T ([link removed]) he Future of Liberty ([link removed])
[link removed]
** Religion and the Republic ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
The Law & Liberty Podcast ([link removed])
** Videos
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]
** Gordon Wood on Defending English Rights for America ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Liberty Fund ([link removed])
Drawing on the revolutionary debate over English rights, Gordon Wood shows how American colonists initially framed their cause as a defense of constitutional liberty rather than a rejection of it. Independence emerged only when the inherited tradition of rights was seen as irretrievably corrupted, transforming the struggle for English liberty into the foundation of a new republic.
[link removed]
Copyright 2025 Liberty Fund. All rights reserved.
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences ([link removed]) or unsubscribe ([link removed]) .
View in browser ([link removed])
[link removed] [link removed]
[link removed] [link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
