From Brennan Center for Justice <[email protected]>
Subject Trump’s abuse of war powers in Venezuela
Date January 8, 2026 8:35 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Only Congress can decide when the United States goes to war. ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

Donate

[link removed]

[link removed]



[link removed]

AFP

No Legal Basis for Invading Venezuela

[link removed]

Over the weekend, U.S. forces bombed Venezuela and captured President Nicolás Maduro and his wife. It was a blatant violation of the Constitution, which gives only Congress the power to declare war, not the president. Administration officials and lawmakers have attempted to defend the legality of President Trump’s regime-change operation, including by comparing it to the 1989 U.S. invasion of Panama, but their arguments don’t hold water, as there are fundamental differences between the two situations. Congress now has a duty to the public and to the Constitution to reject this presidential abuse of war powers

[link removed]

.

Criminal Justice Research Takes a Hit

[link removed]

Republicans and Democrats alike should be concerned about recent setbacks to vital research on criminal justice initiatives. Last year, the Trump administration slashed some $63 million in grant awards that supported criminal justice research and data collection. A new installment in a Brennan Center series

[link removed]

exploring the effects of broader Justice Department funding cuts examines how curtailing federal support for these longtime bipartisan priorities impedes efforts to prevent crime, improve the criminal justice system, and keep communities safe

[link removed]

.

Consequences of Dismantling the Voting Rights Act

[link removed]

The Supreme Court is once again weighing the fate of the Voting Rights Act this term, and the law’s last remaining pillar is at risk. There’s good reason to be concerned about the fallout of a decision in the redistricting case out of Louisiana. New research shows that the last time the Court effectively eliminated one of the law’s core protections — in Shelby County v. Holder in 2013 — it exploded the racial turnout gap in states with histories of racial discrimination

[link removed]

.

Countering Originalism in Court

[link removed]

The Supreme Court and many other federal courts are increasingly deciding major legal questions using originalism — the idea that the Constitution should be interpreted according to its “original public meaning” or related ideas of “history and tradition.” The approach has drawn widespread criticism for frequently sidelining precedent, moral reasoning, logic, and transparency. Still, originalism’s grip on the courts can’t be ignored. A new guide from the Brennan Center offers litigators practical tools, arguments, and citations to push back against originalist claims they encounter in court

[link removed]

.





PODCAST

Trump’s Venezuelan Power Grab

[link removed]

The president’s unauthorized military operation in Venezuela is alarming and unprecedented. Our experts discuss the legal issues at play and what Congress can do right now to respond. Watch or listen on YouTube

[link removed]

// Spotify

[link removed]

// Apple

[link removed]

// Substack

[link removed]

2025 in Review

[link removed]

This past year, we saw extraordinary threats to American democracy: executive power grabs, attacks on the freedom to vote, and more. Yet we also saw a growing response from courts and citizens. Brennan Center experts break down what happened and what might come next. Watch or listen on YouTube

[link removed]

// Spotify

[link removed]

// Apple

[link removed]

// Substack

[link removed]





BRENNAN CENTER ON SOCIAL MEDIA

[link removed]

The Supreme Court’s ruling in the Trump tariffs case could have major implications for the separation of powers and limits on presidential authority. Learn more on TikTok &gt;&gt;

[link removed]







[link removed]

Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law

120 Broadway, Suite 1750 New York, NY 10271

646-292-8310

tel:646-292-8310

[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Support Brennan Center

[link removed]

View Online

[link removed]

Want to change how you receive these emails or unsubscribe? Click here

[link removed]

to update your preferences.

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis