From NDRC <[email protected]>
Subject “Republicans could easily redraw up to a dozen districts across the South”
Date January 7, 2026 9:46 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Did you see this, John?

The New York Times laid out in very stark terms what’s at stake when the Supreme Court rules on the Louisiana v. Callais case:

“Over the longer run, the fate of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which protects majority-minority districts, becomes a key variable. If the Supreme Court strikes it down, Republicans could easily redraw up to a dozen districts across the South.”The fair maps movement has been fighting this case since the beginning, challenging an illegal map in Louisiana. That’s because it was clear from the start what was at stake: The ability for communities of color to elect representation of their own choosing.

Now, the ability for voters of color to make their voices heard across this country hangs in the balance. And we must be prepared for whatever outcome is handed down.

Make a donation to equip the NDRC with the necessary resources to defend one of our most basic rights — the right to vote — for every American, regardless of their race. Your support will enable us to respond to whatever decision the Supreme Court makes, and shore up our representative democracy. [[link removed]]

Despite being a critical safeguard against racist policies like literacy tests and racial gerrymandering, the Voting Rights Act has been systematically weakened in recent years.

Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act required states and localities with a history of racial voter discrimination to obtain “pre-clearance” from the federal government before changing their processes around elections. But in the Supreme Court’s Shelby County decision in 2013, they dismantled this safeguard — effectively removing the pre-clearance requirement and weakening one of the Voting Rights Act’s most important protections.

Now, Republicans are asking the Supreme Court to similarly gut Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which prevents states from diluting the voices of communities of color. At issue is Louisiana’s voting map, which was originally drawn with only one Black opportunity district out of the state’s six congressional districts, despite the fact that Louisiana’s population is one-third Black.

Black Louisiana voters fought back and got the gerrymandered map thrown out — but now the Supreme Court’s decision could undo that progress, trigger mid-decade redistricting in states across the country, and set back progress on voting rights by generations.

We can’t afford to be caught off guard, no matter how the Court rules. Make your donation so we can defend representative democracy in the moments that matter most. [[link removed]]

— The NDRC Team

DONATE [[link removed]]

Paid for by the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, John Bisognano, President.

Threads: [link removed]
Facebook: [link removed]
Instagram: [link removed]
Youtube: [link removed]

National Democratic Redistricting Committee
712 H St NE, #25
Washington, DC 20002
United States

Click here if you'd like to receive fewer emails from the NDRC: [link removed]

unsubscribe: [link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis