View this post on the web at [link removed]

This is an unpopular opinion, but I did not create The Angry Democrat to shy away from opinions. I want to give my opinion, have you get angry about it, write back, and push the conversation forward. That is how ideas get sharper. Maybe you change my mind. Maybe I change yours. Maybe we both walk away smarter. That is the whole point.
My unpopular opinion is simple.
Protests are a waste of time.
With an asterisk.
Protests have not always been a waste of time. During the Vietnam War era, the civil rights movement, desegregation fights, and the women’s rights movement, protests were the foundation of mass political change. In those decades, showing up in the streets was the clearest and loudest form of public speech available.
You could call your representative, but there was no guarantee they would listen. You could write a letter, but who knew if they would ever read it. Protests forced the political class to pay attention because media attention was limited and newspapers covered what they could see with their own eyes. A march forced a headline. A sit-in forced a conversation. A movement forced a vote.
That era is gone.
The Demographics of Political Clubs Tell the Story
Go to any Democratic club meeting today in Northeast Ohio or across the state. You will notice the same thing I have noticed for years. The average age of active members is well into the 60s and 70s. In Wayne County Ohio, one of the most welcoming and hardworking clubs I know, the average age is easily in the 70s. That is not a criticism of older activists. It is a reality check about who is controlling the decision making.
You also see the same dynamic everywhere. Young people show up with ideas and energy. They speak with urgency. They want to be involved. What happens next is predictable. They are dismissed. Treated as though they are naive. Talked down to. Told to wait their turn. Eventually, they stop showing up. They form their own groups or disengage entirely.
This generational wall creates a political reality. The strategies being used today are strategies from 1975, not 2025.
What Does That Have to Do with Protests? Everything.
Protests used to be effective because they filled a communication void. Now the void is gone. We live in a world where social media is the primary battleground. One viral clip reaches more people than a protest of ten thousand people ever could in the 1960s.
If a protest happens and nobody records it, edits it, distributes it, amplifies it, or ties it into a broader digital strategy, it dies on the sidewalk.
A protest without a digital media plan is not activism. It is nostalgia.
The Two Innovators Who Proved the Point
Barack Obama changed modern campaigning by mastering Facebook data and digital outreach long before political consultants understood its power. It was novel at the time. It mobilized young people and reshaped the electorate.
Then, years later, Zohran Mamdani reshaped campaigning again. He knocked on doors, made calls, and did the work on the ground. But what set him apart was a relentless, innovative, perfectly calibrated social media strategy. His TikToks, videos, and micro-messaging created a hybrid campaign model that is now the gold standard. He merged retail politics with viral digital communication.
His opponents ran the 1998 playbook. He ran the 2025 playbook. And he won.
Local Clubs and Activists Are Not Evolving, & They Will Be Left Behind
Here is the truth. If your political club is not prioritizing digital media first, you are already behind. Having a Facebook page was innovative in 2009. Now it is the bare minimum.
Every club should have:
A TikTok.
An Instagram.
A YouTube channel.
A podcast.
Short clip editors.
On-site videographers during actions.
People dedicated to writing scripts, messaging, and tagging relevant officials.
Every protest should begin with the question:
How will this be captured, edited, and distributed?
If you are not asking that, you are not engaging in modern political persuasion.
The Hard Part: Trying New Things
Trying new things is difficult. It is uncomfortable. If you are older, the world feels like it is moving too fast. Technology feels foreign. Social media feels embarrassing. But avoiding it is political suicide.
You do not punish your kids for trying something new. You encourage it. Activists need to do the same. You will make mistakes. Some posts will flop. Some videos will be awkward. But you learn and get better.
The alternative is irrelevance.
The Problem Is the Strategy.
Protesting without a digital plan is the same as yelling into the void. It is not that protests themselves are useless. It is that protests alone are useless in 2025.
If you want to change policy, if you want to pressure lawmakers, if you want your message to reach the people who need to hear it, your first, second, and third priorities must be digital expression.
This is not optional. This is the battlefield.
Protests worked in the past because the world was different. If you are not combining your protests with a coordinated, aggressive, modern digital media strategy, you are not practicing effective activism.
You are reenacting memories of a political world that no longer exists.
If you want to win, if activists want to be heard, and if political clubs want to survive, they must evolve. They must empower young people. They must embrace technology. They must treat digital communication as the core of their activism, not an afterthought.
Because if they do not, someone else will. And when they do, they will outperform you, out-organize you, out-message you, and out-win you.
Are you an ANGRY DEMOCRAT? If so, the please share with other Angry Dems.

Unsubscribe [link removed]?