How Amazon has reshaped government purchasing.Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here to get The Daily Prospect Monday through Friday. [link removed]

[link removed]

**DECEMBER 17, 2025**

Click to read this email in your browser. [link removed]

Amazon’s allure extends beyond individuals: large organizations have transitioned to using the platform to meet their procurement needs. By abandoning traditional competitive bidding processes and fixed-price contracts, cities, counties, and school districts are made vulnerable to Amazon’s price gouging and subpar service. Before our eyes, Amazon is monopolizing [link removed] the needs of overburdened and underfunded schools.

While reporting, I realized that the more money school districts pour into Amazon purchases, the more students and educators will be negatively impacted. Paying more for supplies through Amazon means less funding to improve the educational outcomes of kids. With public education under attack, we should be especially concerned.

As

**The American**

**Prospect’**s

****John Lewis Writing Fellow, I’ve received wonderful guidance from my colleagues and the freedom to report on stories like this. Having the chance to hone in on my reporting skills and advance my professional growth is made possible by readers like you. Can you donate to support the Prospect’s work in 2026 [link removed]?

**–Naomi Bethune, writing fellow**

[link removed]

skodonnell/iStock

Amazon Has Been Conning School Districts Out of Millions [link removed]

Amazon Business [link removed], an operation under the umbrella of Amazon’s services, has grown as a popular procurement tool for businesses and organizations over the past few years. It’s marketed as an experience akin to that of Amazon.com [link removed], allowing users to find, compare, and easily purchase a wide variety of products needed by businesses. In reality, cities, counties, and school districts have been overcharged for such items to the tune of millions of dollars.

An investigative report [link removed] from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR) demonstrates that Amazon Business has been building a monopoly on selling office products, cleaning supplies, and classroom materials. By claiming to offer better deals and quicker service than that of small and midsized businesses, Amazon Business has secured contracts with organizations that have long typically worked with local suppliers. School districts in particular account for 70 percent of local government spending with Amazon, creating unique consequences for officials, educators, and students.

Despite the tried-and-true nature of the traditional competitive bidding process, Amazon Business’s marketplace model has become an attractive option for local agencies. “They [Amazon] make this pitch that Amazon Business is a marketplace, and it therefore offers all the competition that you need. There are different sellers, and it’s like a market, and naturally that leads to the lowest price. And so you don’t have to worry,” says Stacy Mitchell, the co-executive director of ILSR. In reality, however, under the facade of a normal shopping interface, there is a lack of transparency, price-gouging, and an exploitation of the struggles of ill-equipped organizations, particularly school districts.

In the ILSR’s report, multiple instances were found in which separate school districts paid drastically different prices for the same product sold by Amazon. For example, in February of 2023, the Needham, Massachusetts, school district paid $9.08 each for packs of Amazon Basics tape dispensers, yet the city of Charleston, South Carolina, paid $17.99 for the very same product. On January 10th of that same year, Pittsburgh Schools bought two cases of Kleenex for $57.99 each, while Denver Schools paid only $36.91 for a single case. (Incidentally, all this is quite similar [link removed] to the typical retail user’s experience with Amazon.)

Continue reading this story [link removed]

prospect.org/donate

****ON OUR SITE****

Australia proves gun control works [link removed].

**The Bondi mass shooting would have been worse if not for Aussie gun regulations.**

**Not left vs. center, but the people vs. the powerful: A flawed study**may help Democrats [link removed] get back to fighting for the forgotten middle class.

[link removed]

Read more about the [link removed]

IDEAS, POLITICS, and POWER [link removed]

that shape the world around us at [link removed]

prospect.org [link removed]

Copyright (c) 2025 The American Prospect. All rights reserved.**The American Prospect, Inc., 1225 I Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC xxxxxx, United States**
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for our service.
To opt out of American Prospect membership, donation or advertising messaging, click here [link removed].
To manage your newsletter preferences, click here [link removed].
To unsubscribe from all American Prospect emails, including newsletters, click here [link removed].

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

Sent to: [email protected]

Unsubscribe [link removed]

The American Prospect, Inc., 1225 I Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC xxxxxx, United States