[link removed]
Welcome to the December edition of The Lever, featuring expert insights and analysis from Voting Rights Lab ([link removed]) .
[link removed]
In this month’s newsletter, we present an overview of election law developments in 2025, including how President Trump’s agenda is reshaping the landscape of state election policy. We also explore the fallout —with more to come — from New Hampshire’s newly-expanded proof of citizenship laws. Additionally, we highlight the corrosive consequences of having 2020 election deniers in positions of power.


** 2025 ROUNDUP: HOW TRUMP’S ELECTIONS AGENDA FARED IN THE STATES
------------------------------------------------------------

In March, President Trump issued marching orders ([link removed]) to his allies in the states, calling on them to reshape state policies to suit his elections agenda. Our Election Policy Tracker illustrates the impact of Trump’s agenda and rhetoric on the state election policy landscape.

This year alone:
* 37 restrictive voting bills ([link removed]) have been enacted in states — the highest number we’ve recorded since 2021.
* One-quarter (25.9%) of all enacted bills have restricted access to the ballot — the highest share we have ever recorded.
* 51 bills aimed at improving voting and elections ([link removed]) have been enacted — the lowest total since we began tracking.
* While one-third (32%) of enacted bills improved voter access, this figure is down from the previous low of 42% in 2023.

Read our latest analysis ([link removed]) to learn how the president's election agenda played out in the states, along with improvements to voter access and some stories to keep an eye on heading into the 2026 midterms.
LEARN MORE ([link removed])


** BY THE NUMBERS
------------------------------------------------------------

244

That’s how many would-be New Hampshire voters were turned away from the polls this year due to the state’s recently expanded voter proof-of-citizenship and strict identification laws. The New Hampshire Campaign for Voting Rights determined ([link removed]) that 123 people were turned away this fall during city municipal elections. Another 121 Granite Staters were turned away when trying to register to vote for town and school district meetings last March.

The state legislature enacted H.B. 1569 ([link removed]) in 2024, making this year the first test case for the new law. Now, first-time voters must present a photo ID, proof of age, proof of residency at an address covered by the polling place, and proof of citizenship. Formerly, registrants could submit an affidavit attesting to their qualifications. The law also requires that all registered voters present photo identification at their polling place, with no exceptions or backstops, repealing all prior provisions that allowed voters without ID at the polling place to sign an attestation under penalty of perjury.

Notably, New Hampshire only held local elections this year, which generally see lower voter turnout. With these new restrictions, we can expect to see a significantly higher number of voters turned away in the 2026 midterm elections.
READ MORE ([link removed])


** WHAT WE’RE READING: THEY TRIED TO OVERTURN THE 2020 US ELECTION. NOW THEY HOLD POWER IN TRUMP’S WASHINGTON
------------------------------------------------------------

After losing the 2020 election to Joe Biden, Donald Trump mounted an all-out campaign to overturn the election results. A litany of figures aided him in this illegitimate crusade. Since Trump resumed the presidency in 2025, he has appointed many of the same election deniers to key federal positions. Now, they are using their newfound powers to reshape the federal government, meddle in state election administration, and possibly interfere with the outcomes of future elections.

A recent story in The Guardian ([link removed]) explored this campaign, highlighting how these anti-democracy activists are undermining free and fair elections. From drafting the language of the ill-fated Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act ([link removed]) , to demanding that states turn over sensitive voter data, to building a national voter registry, to making massive budgetary cuts ([link removed]) to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, these election deniers are inserting the federal government into state-run elections in unprecedented ways.

“In the ways that you’re seeing more high-profile election deniers in positions in the federal government, you have to also keep in mind that the benches are currently also being stacked at the more grassroots level, in county boards and state boards of elections.”
– Samantha Tarazi, Co-Founder and CEO, Voting Rights Lab

Trump’s allies in state legislatures have also been hard at work this year ([link removed]) implementing his election agenda at the state and local levels. In Georgia and Arizona, election-denier activists gained power on local election boards. And in North Carolina, Judge Jefferson Griffin’s attempts to overturn his election loss this year offer a clear template for bad-faith actors to challenge election results they don’t like.
READ MORE ([link removed])


** THE MARKUP
------------------------------------------------------------

The Markup is Voting Rights Lab’s law and policy update, powered by our Election Policy Tracker ([link removed]) . If you would like to subscribe, please check the sign-up box at the bottom of this form ([link removed]) .

Here’s an excerpt from last week’s Markup. We will resume weekly updates on January 5, 2026.
* Georgia court reinstates ban on providing food and water to voters in line. An appeals court in Georgia reversed ([link removed]) a lower court's decision that had partially struck down provisions from S.B. 202 ([link removed]) . Enacted in 2021, this law prohibited providing food or water to voters waiting in line at a polling place. The appeals court decision reinstates the ban and associated criminal penalty.

* Hundreds of Texas voters were incorrectly identified as potential noncitizens. County election officials have confirmed ([link removed]) that hundreds of voters whom the secretary of state flagged as potential noncitizens are, in fact, citizens. The secretary's office used the federal SAVE database to identify the potential noncitizens. The office failed to check with the Texas Department of Public Safety, the state agency that collects proof-of-citizenship documents before issuing driver's licenses.

Did someone forward this to you? Subscribe to our newsletters here. ([link removed])

Like our work, and want to help make it happen?
Make a tax-deductible contribution to Voting Rights Lab here. ([link removed])

============================================================
** Voting Rights Lab ([link removed])

611 Pennsylvania Ave SE | Suite 201 | Washington, DC 20003

We're grateful for your interest and support, but if you'd prefer not to receive emails from the Voting Rights Lab, click here to ** unsubscribe ([link removed])
.