[[link removed]]

EUROPEAN COUNCIL PRESIDENT WARNS US NOT TO INTERFERE IN EUROPE’S
AFFAIRS  
[[link removed]]


 

December 8, 2025
The Guardian
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ A new US national security document codifies backing far-right
nationalist parties in Europe as a core part of America’s strategy.
A top European leader responds, “What we cannot accept is the threat
to interfere in European politics.” _

Donald Trump with the European Commission president, Ursula von der
Leyen (third left), Emmanuel Macron (second left) and Giorgia Meloni
(front), as well as Nato’s Mark Rutte and Ukraine’s Volodymr
Zelenskyy, Photo: Ukrainian Presidential Press Service/AFP/Getty
Images

 

The president of the European Council of national leaders, António
Costa, has warned Donald Trump’s administration against interfering
in Europe’s affairs, as analysts said the US national security
strategy
[[link removed]]
represented a seismic shift in transatlantic relations.

Released on Friday, the policy paper claims Europe
[[link removed]] faces
“civilisational erasure” because of migration and a censorious EU
“undermining political liberty and sovereignty”. Confirming not
just the Trump administration’s hostility to Europe but its ambition
to weaken the bloc, it says the US will “cultivate resistance” in
the bloc to “correct its current trajectory”.

Costa said the signal that Washington would back Europe’s
nationalist parties was unacceptable. Speaking on Monday, he said
there were longstanding differences with Trump on issues such as the
climate crisis, but that the new strategy went “beyond that … What
we cannot accept is the threat to interfere in European politics,”
he said.

“Allies do not threaten to interfere in the domestic political
choices of their allies,” the former Portuguese prime minister said.
“The US cannot replace Europe in what its vision is of free
expression … Europe must be sovereign.”

The strategy document was welcomed at the weekend by the Kremlin
[[link removed]],
which said it “corresponds in many ways to our vision”, while
EU-US relations were strained further by a $120m (£90m) fine
[[link removed]]
imposed by the EU on Elon Musk’s social media platform X.

Musk said on Sunday the bloc should be “abolished and sovereignty
returned to individual countries”. The US deputy secretary of state,
Christopher Landau, said the “unelected, undemocratic, and
unrepresentative” EU was undermining US security.

Analysts said the document codified a US strategy first outlined by JD
Vance
[[link removed]]
at this year’s Munich Security Conference in a speech that accused
EU leaders of suppressing free speech, failing to halt illegal
migration and running from voters’ true beliefs.

“It transposes that doctrine into an officially backed state
line,” said Nicolai von Ondarza, the head of European research at
the German Institute for International and Security Affairs. “It
really represents a fundamental shift in transatlantic relations.”

Von Ondarza said that in particular, “open US backing for regime
change” in Europe meant that it was “really no longer possible for
EU and national European leaders to deny that US strategy towards its
European allies has radically changed”.

Max Bergmann, the director of the Europe, Russia, Eurasia programme at
the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies,
said
[[link removed]]
political meddling in Europe to back far-right nationalists was now
“a core part of America’s national strategy”.

Bergmann added: “This isn’t just a speech from a novice
vice-president weeks into a new term. It is US policy, and they will
try to implement it.” Moreover, he said, it could work: “In a
fragmented political landscape, a 1-2% shift can change elections.”

EU leaders “will have to confront the fact that the Trump
administration is coming for them politically”, Bergmann said. “Do
they just accept that Trump is funding their political downfall? Or
does this begin to cause an incredible amount of friction?”

Mujtaba Rahman, of the Eurasia Group risk consultancy, agreed. “The
US is now officially committed, alongside Moscow, to interfering in
European electoral politics to promote nationalist and anti-EU parties
of the far right,” he said.

He said that if the document was US policy, the first election
Washington would try to influence would be Hungary’s parliamentary
ballot in April next year, in which the nationalist, Moscow-friendly
incumbent Viktor Orbán faces a stiff challenge.

Minna Ålander of the Center for European Policy Analysis said
[[link removed]]
the policy document was “actually useful. It codifies in policy, in
black and white, what has been evident all year long: Trump and his
people are openly hostile to Europe.”

Europe’s leaders “cannot ignore or explain the fact away any
more”, Ålander said. “Any hope for things to go back to the old
normal looks increasingly ludicrous. Europe needs to finally seize the
initiative and stop wasting time trying to manage Trump.”

Nathalie Tocci, the director of Italy’s Instituto Affari
Internazionale, said
[[link removed]]
Europeans had “lulled themselves into the belief” that Trump was
“unpredictable and inconsistent, but ultimately manageable. This is
reassuring, but wrong.”

The Trump administration had “a clear and consistent vision for
Europe: one that prioritises US-Russia ties and seeks to divide and
conquer the continent, with much of the dirty work carried out by
nationalist, far-right European forces,” she said.

Those forces “share the nationalist and socially conservative views
championed by Maga and are also working to divide Europe and hollow
out the European project”, Tocci said, arguing that flattering Trump
“will not save the transatlantic relationship”.

Germany’s spy chief, Sinan Selen, said on Monday he “would not
draw from such a strategy document the conclusion that we should break
with America”, and Jana Puglierin, a senior policy fellow at the
European Council on Foreign Relations, stressed that Trump remained
erratic and the document may not ultimately amount to much.

However, she said, the US clearly wanted to “redefine what Europe
means, to Europeans”. The aim was to somehow establish that it is
“us who are the aberration, that we have somehow forgotten our true
values and heritage, and that European greatness therefore needs to be
restored – with the help of ‘patriotic’ parties”, Puglierin
said.

She said Europeans needed “to see the relationship much more
pragmatically. Realise that endless flattery of Trump, promising to
spend 5% of GDP on defence, or offering him breakfast with a king …
is just not going to cut it.”

Von Ondarza said appeasement “has not worked on trade, it hasn’t
worked on security, and it won’t prevent the US supporting
Europe’s far right”. “The bloc needs to articulate a strong
strategy of its own.” A summit later this month would be a
“decisive test of Europe’s ability to say no” to the US, he
said.

_Jon Henley_ [[link removed]]_ is the
Guardian's Europe correspondent, based in Paris._

_The Guardian_ [[link removed]]_ is globally renowned
for its coverage of politics, the environment, science, social
justice, sport and culture. Scroll less and understand more about the
subjects you care about with the Guardian's __brilliant email
newsletters_
[[link removed]]_,
free to your inbox._

* Donald Trump
[[link removed]]
* Right-wing politics
[[link removed]]
* the European Union
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]
Manage subscription
[[link removed]]
Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Bluesky [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]