|
Friend,
FPC could be on the cusp of
fighting to end bans on so-called “assault weapons” at the Supreme
Court, and news could hit as soon as tomorrow!
That’s because we recently
petitioned SCOTUS to hear our watershed “assault weapons” challenge
Viramontes, and this case has been scheduled for
conference.
As you know, during the Conference,
SCOTUS can decide whether to hear cases like Viramontes, and we believe we have a real chance of
being called to action!
If this happens, get ready for the Showdown of the Decade
at SCOTUS, because FPC’s case has the potential to be a game changer
just like Heller,
McDonald, and
Bruen!
Obviously, the immediate impact of
a SCOTUS win in our AWB case could be the destruction of bans on
common semiautomatic firearms like the AR-15.
But beyond this, it would also be a
powerful statement from our nation’s highest court that the Second
Amendment means what it says, and other gun control nonsense is on
notice.
Destroying the tyrants’ favorite gun bans would be the shot
heard ‘round the world, and would TOTALLY DEVASTATE the Disarmament
Regime.
That’s why we’re so pumped about
SCOTUS possibly hearing our case, but before news breaks either way,
we still need to make sure the Lawsuit Printer is 100% ready for
action.
Therefore,
we need to humbly ask for your support. Please, if you can, chip in a
quick donation of $25 or more to help terminate gun bans
nationwide!
If you give immediately, you will be entered to WIN a
Nighthawk GRP Recon in .45 ACP as a thank you for stepping
up!
Remember, Friend, if you live in a
state with an “assault weapons” ban like California, New York, etc.,
this case could be YOUR CHANCE to finally be rid of your state’s
ban!
And even if you live in a state
that’s currently free of these abominations, know that a win in
Viramontes
will still have a
tremendous impact on liberty where you live by:
- Taking
future gun bans off the table
- And
securing a pro-gun precedent that will make the tyrants
tremble
We can’t wait to hopefully have
some GREAT NEWS to share on this front very soon. But in the meantime,
here’s a quick snapshot of everything else you may have missed this
last week:
-
Mon, Dec 1
- Landmark Firearms v. Evanchick: Response to the rule to
show cause filed at Commonwealth Court by FPC.
- Struck
v. Platkin: Reply in support of FPC’s motion to amend the complaint
filed at District Court by FPC.
-
Tues, Dec 2
- FPC
v. Bondi: Notice of appeal filed at District Court by federal
government.
- Jensen v. ATF: Scheduling order issued by District
Court.
-
Thur, Dec 4
- Jaymes v. Bonta: Answer filed at District Court by
CA.
-
Fri, Dec 5
- Reese v. ATF: Conference scheduled for Dec 16 by
District Court.
As always, THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT!
For freedom and liberty,
The FPC Team
NO PURCHASE IS NECESSARY TO ENTER OR
WIN A CONTEST. A PURCHASE WILL NOT INCREASE YOUR CHANCES OF WINNING.
ALL FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND MUNICIPAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS APPLY.
VOID WHERE PROHIBITED.
Sweepstakes
Rules / Supporting
Entry / Alternate
Means of Entry
|