Friends,
Peter Beinart and I have been debating – productively, passionately – for many years. But this week, we had one of our most important conversations yet, and I think it’s worth your attention.
It began when Peter apologized for speaking at Tel Aviv University, citing pressure from BDS activists – and I publicly disagreed, arguing that we won’t strengthen our movements by narrowing where we can talk or who we can talk to.
Before I go further, if you want to watch the debate, get full access to my column about Peter’s apology and join thousands following these conversations in real time, subscribe to Word on the Street here. It’s free, and it’s where I share everything first.
Subscribe & Watch the Debate
Now, why did this particular disagreement matter so much?
Because it’s not just about Tel Aviv University. It’s not even just about Peter’s apology. It’s about something fundamental: How we engage across lines of difference, and whether we allow pressure, from any direction, to shut down debate.
Peter and I see this moment differently. We both care deeply about justice, equality and freedom. We both believe in uplifting Palestinian voices, and we both despise the occupation.
But when it comes to boycotts, engagement and where we should or shouldn’t speak – our paths diverge. And the stakes feel higher than ever. Instead of writing past each other, we sat down and talked directly, honestly and respectfully.
I won’t spoil the conversation. If you care about Israel-Palestine, how we expand our movement or the future of Jewish communal debate, it’s a conversation I hope you’ll spend some time with.
Watch the Debate & Subscribe to Word on the Street
Thank you for being part of a community that believes in showing up, listening deeply and arguing toward a better future.
Onward,
Jeremy Ben-Ami
President, J Street
