From Jerrick Adams <[email protected]>
Subject Michigan Civil Service Commission approves union dues deduction rule change
Date July 17, 2020 5:22 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Find out how the Commission's vote split
------------------------------------------------------------

Welcome to Union Station, our weekly newsletter that keeps you abreast of the legislation, national trends, and public debate surrounding public-sector union policy.
 
 
** MICHIGAN CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION APPROVES RULE CHANGE FOR DEDUCTING UNION DUES FROM EMPLOYEE PAYCHECKS    
------------------------------------------------------------

On July 13, the Michigan Civil Service Commission voted ([link removed]) 3-1 in favor of a rule change requiring unionized state employees to authorize union dues deductions from their paychecks on an annual basis. 

 
** WHAT IS AT ISSUE?
------------------------------------------------------------

Rule 6-7 of Michigan's Civil Service Rules ([link removed]) had allowed for the deduction of union dues from workers' paychecks, subject to their consent. The rule did not establish an expiration date for dues deduction authorizations: 

"If agreed to in a collective bargaining agreement, the state may deduct the dues or service fee of a member of an exclusively represented bargaining unit through payroll deduction. An appointing authority cannot deduct membership dues or service fees unless the employee has made a voluntary authorization. The director shall establish the exclusive process for employees to authorize or deauthorize deduction of dues or fees." 

Under the rule change which takes effect Sept. 1, workers must consent to dues deductions annually. If a worker does not authorize dues deductions between now and Sept. 1, dues deductions will be automatically canceled. 

 
** WHAT IS THE MICHIGAN CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, AND HOW DID THE VOTE SPLIT? 
------------------------------------------------------------

The Michigan Civil Service Commission ([link removed]) is a state agency that regulates all conditions of employment for classified state employees. The governor appoints the commission's four members to staggered eight-year terms. 

Gov. Rick Snyder (R) appointed all four current members of the commission. Three members – James Barrett, Jase Bolger, and Jeff Steffel – voted to approve the rule change. Commission chair Janet McClelland voted against it. Bolger and Barrett are registered with the Republican Party. Steffel and McClelland are registered independents.

 
** WHAT ARE THE REACTIONS? 
------------------------------------------------------------

 
** SUPPORT
------------------------------------------------------------

* Bolger said ([link removed]) the rule change is a "protection of rights" for state employees: "I do not agree with claims that it impacts rights to collective bargaining. Instead, unions will be able to make their case, but I do believe it protects individual workers’ rights. Workers will remain free to make their choice." 

 
** OPPOSITION
------------------------------------------------------------

* Ron Bieber, president of the Michigan affiliate of the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO), said ([link removed]) , "This action has no other purpose than to impose arbitrary hardships on bargaining units, create turmoil in workplaces during a historic pandemic and a global recession, and disrupt the work that unions do on behalf of these state workers. It’s unconstitutional, it’s unsupported by any recent laws or court decisions, and it’s just plain wrong. They should be ashamed.

 
** RELATION TO JANUS V. AFSCME ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

* Vincent Vernuccio, senior fellow for the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, discussed ([link removed]) the rule change in relation to the Supreme Court's 2018 decision in _Janus v. AFSCME_: "In 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court issued the [_Janus_] decision that did two things, both of which are being updated for the rule change here. The first, it basically gave right to work for state employees throughout the country. The second, in what Justice [Samuel] Alito called 'affirmative consent,' it required an opt-in provision to protect the public employees’ First Amendment rights." 

* Chuck Browning, director of the United Auto Workers Region 1A, disputed ([link removed]) the application of _Janus_ as a justification for the rule change: "As the court itself noted, 'States can keep their labor relations systems exactly as they are.' Only that they don’t have to force non-members to subsidize public sector unions. _Janus_, therefore, does not justify the proposed rule change."

------------------------------------------------------------

[link removed]
------------------------------------------------------------

 
** WHAT WE ARE READING
------------------------------------------------------------

* Lexology, "Virginia General Assembly makes pro-employee changes to state laws," July 15, 2020 ([link removed])
* Washington Examiner, "Ohio public employees win settlement in ‘limited window’ union dues case," July 15, 2020 ([link removed])
* In These Times, "The Public Sector’s Right to Strike Is Left Behind in Biden-Bernie Task Force Compromise," July 9, 2020 ([link removed])

------------------------------------------------------------

 
** THE BIG PICTURE
------------------------------------------------------------

 
** _NUMBER OF RELEVANT BILLS BY STATE_
------------------------------------------------------------

We are currently tracking 97 pieces of legislation dealing with public-sector employee union policy. On the map below, a darker shade of green indicates a greater number of relevant bills. Click here ([link removed]) for a complete list of all the bills we're tracking.

[link removed]
 

 
** _NUMBER OF RELEVANT BILLS BY CURRENT LEGISLATIVE STATUS_
------------------------------------------------------------

 

 
** _NUMBER OF RELEVANT BILLS BY PARTISAN STATUS OF SPONSOR(S)_
------------------------------------------------------------

[link removed]
 
------------------------------------------------------------

 
** RECENT LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS
------------------------------------------------------------

No legislative actions have been taken on relevant bills since our last issue.
 
------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for reading! Let us know what you think! Reply to this email with any feedback or recommendations.
BALLOTPEDIA DEPENDS ON THE SUPPORT OF OUR READERS.

The Lucy Burns Institute, publisher of Ballotpedia, is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. All donations are tax deductible to the extent of the law. Donations to the Lucy Burns Institute or Ballotpedia do not support any candidates or campaigns.
 

Click here to support our work ([link removed])
 
------------------------------------------------------------

============================================================
** Follow on Twitter (#)
   ** Friend on Facebook (#)
   ** Forward to Friend ([link removed])
 _Copyright © 2020, All rights reserved._

OUR MAILING ADDRESS IS:

Ballotpedia
8383 Greenway Blvd
Suite 600
Middleton, WI 53562
** unsubscribe from all emails [link removed]
   ** update subscription preferences [link removed]
**   [link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Ballotpedia
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United States
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • Pardot
    • Litmus