In another notable “Meet the Press” moment on Sunday, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem claimed without evidence that the former CIA asset accused of shooting two National Guard members in Washington, D.C., last week had been “radicalized” since arriving in the United States.
Noem told Welker, “We believe he was radicalized since he’s been here in this country. We do believe it was through connections in his home community and state, and we’re going to continue to talk to those who interacted with him.”
Rahmanullah Lakanwal, an Afghan national who served alongside U.S. troops in Afghanistan, came to the U.S. in 2021. That was during the Biden administration — a point that Noem and the Trump administration continue to stress. However, according to several reports, Lakanwal was granted asylum during the Trump administration. In fact, it was Noem’s department that would have approved that asylum.
MS NOW’s Erum Salam reported, “Noem repeatedly avoided directly answering questions from NBC’s Kristen Welker on that point. The Trump administration was not given enough information to properly vet people like Lakanwal, Noem said, but she did not detail specifically what information was lacking. ‘That’s the Biden administration’s responsibility,’ Noem said.”
West Virginia National Guard Specialist Sarah Beckstrom, 20, was killed in the shooting, and Staff Sgt. Andrew Wolfe, 24, was critically wounded. Lakanwal, 29, has been charged with first-degree murder.
The Associated Press’ Farnoush Amiri wrote Sunday, “The Afghan man accused of shooting two National Guard members blocks from the White House had been unraveling for years, unable to hold a job and flipping between long, lightless stretches of isolation and taking sudden weekslong cross-country drives. Rahmanullah Lakanwal’s behavior deteriorated so sharply that a community advocate reached out to a refugee organization for help, fearing he was becoming suicidal. Emails obtained by The Associated Press reveal mounting warnings about the asylum-seeker whose erratic conduct raised alarms long before the attack that jolted the nation’s capital on Wednesday, the eve of Thanksgiving. The previously unreported concerns offer the clearest picture yet of how he was struggling in his new life in the United States.”
An unflattering view
Good stuff here from David Bauder, media writer for The Associated Press. Well, I say good stuff. It’s actually a tad depressing: “A lost generation of news consumers? Survey shows how teenagers dislike the news media.”
Bauder writes:
Asked by the News Literacy Project for one word to describe today’s news media, 84% of teens responded with something negative — “biased,” “crazy,” “boring,” “fake, ”bad,” “depressing,” “confusing,” “scary.” More than half of the teens surveyed believe journalists regularly engage in unethical behaviors like making up details or quotes in stories, paying sources, taking visual images out of context or doing favors for advertisers. Less than a third believe reporters correct their errors, confirm facts before reporting them, gather information from multiple sources or cover stories in the public interest — practices ingrained in the DNA of reputable journalists.
Here’s the survey from the News Literacy Project.
There’s much more to Bauder’s story than just teens’ negative views, so be sure to check it out.
Word of the year
The Oxford University Press — the folks behind the Oxford English Dictionary — have named its 2025 Word of the Year. It’s actually two words:
Rage bait.
It’s defined as “online content deliberately designed to elicit anger or outrage by being frustrating, provocative or offensive.”
Yep, sounds like a good choice.
Rage bait beat out “biohack” and “aura farming.”
The New York Times’ Jennifer Schuessler wrote, “Over the past year, according to Oxford’s data, frequency of use spiked by a factor of three. The two-syllable open-compound word lands with blunt force. It also sparks an immediate ‘aha.’”
Casper Grathwohl, the president of Oxford Languages, told Schuessler, “Even if people have never heard it before, they instantly know what it means. And they want to talk about it.”
Oxford’s experts put together a short list of contending words and then asked the public to weigh in. The winner was then chosen by Oxford’s committee.
Grathwohl told the Times, “The point of the Word of the Year is to encourage people to reflect on where we are as a culture, who we are at the moment, through the lens of words we use. The whole point is to create conversation.”
Media tidbits
Hot type
More resources for journalists
- Experienced managers: Develop the must-have skills journalists need to lead media organizations of the future. Apply now.
- Gain the skills to spot AI risks like bias, misinformation and hallucinations before they harm your work. Enroll now.
- Join 300 newsrooms receiving free digital preservation training. Apply by Jan. 9, 2026.
- Access a list of mental health reporting resources on funding, source-building and more.
Have feedback or a tip? Email Poynter senior media writer Tom Jones at [email protected].
The Poynter Report is your daily dive into the world of media, packed with the latest news and insights. Get it delivered to your inbox Monday through Friday by signing up here. And don’t forget to tune into our biweekly podcast for even more.