From FAIR <[email protected]>
Subject NYT Mourns Lost Glamor of Jeffrey Epstein’s New York
Date November 26, 2025 8:25 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
[link removed]

FAIR
View article on FAIR's website ([link removed])
NYT Mourns Lost Glamor of Jeffrey Epstein’s New York Raina Lipsitz ([link removed])


NYT: Epstein Emails Reveal a Bygone Elite

New York Times (11/16/25 ([link removed]) ): "In those days, print newspapers and magazines still held sway, and Mr. Epstein had close ties to many key players in the news media and adjacent industries."

The late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein is best known for having been accused of operating a sex-trafficking ring that supplied elite men with girls as young as 14 ([link removed]) . Epstein and his associates are believed to have abused hundreds ([link removed]) of women and girls on Little Saint James, a private island Epstein owned from 1998 until his death in 2019. But in the New York Times’ telling, it’s not the girls on Epstein’s island but rather President Donald Trump—an Epstein associate many suspect of having participated ([link removed]) in the alleged abuse—who is being “held captive” by a “news cycle he can’t avoid or defeat” (New York Times, 11/18/25 ([link removed]
025/11/18/us/politics/trump-epstein-files.html) ).

In reporting on Epstein and those in his orbit, the Times has frequently focused on the men and the supposedly bygone era in which they committed their crimes with impunity. “Epstein Emails Reveal a Lost New York,” read one such headline—later changed to “Epstein Emails Reveal a Bygone Elite”—above a story (11/16/25 ([link removed]) ) that expressed nostalgia for “a clubby world that is all but gone.”

Epstein’s emails, reporter Shawn McCreesh wrote, are “like a portal back to a lost Manhattan power scene.” Epstein’s inbox, he added, was “larded with boldface names...that once meant everything to status-obsessed New Yorkers.” These emails, which stretched back decades, “show how that protected realm vanished into the mists of time, pulled under by the rising forces of the internet and the #MeToo movement.”


** 'They are not mass rapists'
------------------------------------------------------------
NYT: The Epstein Story? Count Me Out.

David Brooks (New York Times, 11/21/25 ([link removed]) ) suggests a message for Democratic politicians: "No governing majority will ever form if we’re locked in a permanent class war."

New York Times columnist David Brooks seemed to want to bring back that protected realm, calling for less talk about Epstein's documented ties to members of the global elite, up to and including the president of the United States. Under the headline “The Epstein Story? Count Me Out” (11/21/25 ([link removed]) ), Brooks suggested that caring about Epstein’s ties to elite figures is the province of conspiracy nuts and social media mobs. “Say what you will about our financial, educational, nonprofit and political elites,” Brooks wrote, “but they are not mass rapists.”

The only other reference to girls, women or rape comes in the form of a quote he included from Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna: “I realized how much the abuse by rich and powerful men of young girls and the sense of a rape island that Epstein had set up for people embodied the corruption of government.”

Brooks thinks this is silly, and that Khanna’s use of the phrase “the Epstein class” is “inaccurate, unfair and irresponsible.” He cautioned against leaping to the conclusion that Epstein was “a typical member of the American establishment,” rather than an “outlier.”

As a female Times reader wrote of Brooks’ column in a letter to the editor (11/24/25 ([link removed]) ), there is “not one word of sympathy for or concern…in Mr. Brooks’s 1,200-word piece” for Epstein’s “largely anonymous and helpless teenage victims.”

To Brooks, it’s elite figures, and even Epstein himself, who are the real victims: After all, far-right commentator Candace Owens sees Epstein not just as a “rancid man,” but “a scheming Jew working on behalf of Israel to control assets via blackmail.”


** 'Lying low, at least for a while'
------------------------------------------------------------
NYT: Lawrence Summers Came Back From Scandals. Will Epstein Emails Prevent That?

New York Times (11/20/25 ([link removed]) ) quotes economist Brad DeLong: “Larry will continue to have worthwhile thoughts.”

A similar worry about excess Epstein talk seemed to suffuse a recent Times news article (11/20/25 ([link removed]) ) on Epstein associate Larry Summers, a former Harvard president and Clinton era Treasury Secretary. “Lawrence Summers Came Back From Scandals. Will Epstein Emails Prevent That?” read the headline. The subhead characterized evidence of predatory behavior as another potentially survivable controversy: “The former Harvard president has come back from controversy before, but revelations in new Epstein emails are threatening his omnipresence in public life.”

From this article, we learn that Summers has held many “prominent roles,” has long been an “omnipresent public intellectual,” is “one of the country’s best-known economists,” has held positions on “prominent boards,” and is part of

a vast group of powerful men who have faced seemingly career-threatening scandals over comments or actions related to their treatment of women, and yet have maintained a place in public life.

This status is now in jeopardy, thanks to the Epstein emails, which merely revealed Summers’ “chumminess with a notorious sex offender.” The Times even helpfully paraphrased the recommendations of a crisis and reputation management specialist for men in Summers’ position: “lying low, at least for a while, and doing selfless work, such as philanthropy.”

The Times is not the only publication more concerned with the problems of the powerful than the circumstances of their victims. In a story headlined, “After decades of power, Washington shuns Larry Summers over Epstein ties,” the Washington Post (11/21/25 ([link removed]) ) reported that Summers, who “dominated economic thought, on both sides of the aisle, for the better part of four decades,” is now persona non grata in Washington because he corresponded with Epstein for years and sought advice about an attempt to “court” a woman nearly 30 years his junior. All we learn about the woman Summers was attempting to “court” is that she was decades younger and a fellow economist.
------------------------------------------------------------

Featured Image: New York Times story (11/18/25 ([link removed]) )

ACTION ALERT: You can send a message to the New York Times at [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) or via Bluesky: @NYTimes.com ([link removed]) . Please remember that respectful communication is the most effective. Feel free to leave a copy of your message in the comments thread here.
Read more ([link removed])

Share this post: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Twitter"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Twitter" alt="Twitter" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Facebook"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Pinterest"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Pinterest" alt="Pinterest" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn" alt="LinkedIn" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Google Plus"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Google Plus" alt="Google Plus" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Instapaper"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Instapaper" alt="Instapaper" class="mc-share"></a>


© 2021 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

Our mailing address is:
FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001

FAIR's Website ([link removed])

FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today ([link removed]) .

Follow us on Twitter ([link removed]) | Friend us on Facebook ([link removed])

change your preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
unsubscribe ([link removed]) .
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis