[[link removed]]

TRUMP’S ONE WEIRD TRICK FOR ELIMINATING BAD NEWS: DELETE IT  
[[link removed]]


 

Catherine Rampell
November 20, 2025
The xxxxxx
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ How do you eradicate hunger, STDs, illiteracy, poverty? It’s
actually quite simple. You stop measuring them. _

, Stephan Baum

 

HOW DO YOU ERADICATE hunger
[[link removed]],
STDs
[[link removed]],
illiteracy
[[link removed]],
poverty
[[link removed]]?

It’s actually quite simple. You stop measuring them.

The government shutdown that just concluded left the country in
something of a data blackout. Some major economic data releases have
been delayed (like the September jobs report, which belatedly came out
today [[link removed]]), and others
canceled altogether (the October jobs report, which will never be
released
[[link removed]]).
This has made it unusually difficult for U.S. businesses and the
Federal Reserve to assess how well the economy is doing.

But if you assume the reopening of the government has put an end to
these challenges, think again. The real threat to our understanding of
the U.S. economy, and the country’s health writ large, is not that
measly, six-week shutdown fight. It’s the fact that the Trump
administration has been quietly snuffing out thousands of other data
series, particularly those that might produce politically inconvenient
results.

Take for example President Donald Trump’s boasts about bringing more
international investment into the United States.1
[[link removed]]
He extracted pledges from Switzerland
[[link removed]]
and South Korea
[[link removed]].
Just this week, he boasted of a whopping $1 trillion
[[link removed]]
in blood money from Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (as
my colleague Andrew Egger notes
[[link removed]],
the Saudi investment jumped from $600 billion to $1 trillion in the
course of a few minutes and would, if real, amount to an absurd chunk
of the country’s GDP).

But fulfillment of such pledges is notoriously fickle; in the past,
plenty of foreign companies and governments have promised big
investments in U.S. factories and jobs that never materialized
[[link removed]],
generating bad headlines for the politicians who wrangled them.
Fortunately for Trump, these pledges will become increasingly
un-fact-checkable.

That’s because yesterday, to relatively little fanfare, the U.S.
Bureau of Economic Analysis announced
[[link removed]]
it was discontinuing some of its data collection on foreign investment
in the United States as part of its “ongoing streamlining
initiatives.” This follows previous announcements
[[link removed]]
from the BEA in recent months about how it was paring back other data
collection on foreign direct investment due to “resource constraints
[[link removed]].”

In the absence of data, I guess we’ll simply have to trust Trump
when he says that he’s delivered.

Now, do I think Trump _directed_ the BEA to eliminate these measures
specifically to make it easier for him to bullshit about his
dealmaking prowess? Not exactly. While there are some cases where the
administration has leaned on statistical agencies or explicitly
censored their findings
[[link removed]],
the more common and less visible tactic has been to just defund them
[[link removed]].

Trump’s fiscal year 2026 budget request
[[link removed]]
for the Bureau of Economic Analysis reflects a 20 percent reduction
compared to last year, a target that agency staff have told me
they’ve already_ _hit_ _thanks to DOGE cuts, early retirements, and
hiring freezes. (The comms team at BEA—like most statistical agency
press offices I’ve contacted in recent months—has declined to
confirm or deny these numbers.) This has forced the BEA to make tough
choices. The agency also is responsible for producing much
higher-profile, market-moving data, such as the reports on GDP,
consumer spending, and the Federal Reserve’s preferred measure of
inflation. Something had to give, and this week, that something was
data on foreign investment.

Other major statistical agencies are struggling with their own brain
drains and funding cuts.

Take the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which releases data on the job
market and prices, among other marquee measures. In August, Trump’s
decision to fire Erika McEntarfer, the BLS commissioner, grabbed
headlines,2
[[link removed]]
but the top job is hardly the only hole this administration has blown
in that agency. At the time of McEntarfer’s firing, a third of
senior BLS leadership positions were already vacant
[[link removed]].
(That’s still the case
[[link removed]], in fact.)

The rest of the agency has been swiss-cheesed too. Some regional field
offices—such as the consumer price index offices in Buffalo, New
York; Lincoln, Nebraska; and Provo, Utah—have been shuttered
entirely
[[link removed]].
Meanwhile, post-COVID, the agency was already struggling with reduced
survey-response rates, which have made its numbers noisier and more
susceptible to big revisions. The administration’s response has been
to disband the task force
[[link removed]]
working to fix these problems.

The result is that federal data are being degraded—or deleted
altogether. And deletion is especially common when statistical series
measure issues that this administration would rather not track.

In September, for instance, the administration canceled a
three-decade-old annual survey that measures how many Americans
struggle to get enough food
[[link removed]].
A few months earlier, HHS eliminated the team that produces the
poverty guidelines
[[link removed]],
which determine how we count the number of people in poverty and
eligibility for benefits such as SNAP, Medicaid, Head Start, and
childcare subsidies. But hey, if you never determine who’s eligible
for benefits, maybe that means no one is.

Over the past ten months, I’ve been tracking similar cuts to federal
data collection on substance abuse
[[link removed]],
natural disasters
[[link removed]],
children’s literacy
[[link removed]],
climate change
[[link removed]],
race
[[link removed]],
crime
[[link removed]],
immigration
[[link removed]],
gender identity
[[link removed]]
and other issues. (My non-exhaustive, running list lives here
[[link removed]];
please send me examples I may have missed.)

Lots of people might take these numbers for granted, but we’ll
notice when they’re gone. We need these data to interpret the world
around us and make decisions
[[link removed]].
Consumers use them to track the weather, determine where to send their
kids to school, and negotiate raises. Businesses use them to hire,
invest, price, and purchase. Doctors use them to diagnose illnesses.
Public officials use them to craft policy.3
[[link removed]]
And voters use them to determine whether their elected officials are
keeping their promises.

But instead of recognizing the usefulness of these data—or perhaps
_because_ he recognizes it—the president has chosen to curate his
own reality
[[link removed]].

As was the case last week, when the White House cheerily announced
that inflation had fallen because DoorDash’s breakfast offerings
[[link removed]]
had gotten cheaper, and because Walmart had shrinkflationed
[[link removed]]
its Thanksgiving dinner deal
[[link removed]].
Maybe this seemed forgivable when government agencies were shut down
and everyone was looking for alternative measures to fill the
statistical void. My fear is that the voids are multiplying.

1
[[link removed]]
 Boosting foreign direct investment in the United States is a
somewhat bizarre thing for Trump to fixate on, since higher FDI
mathematically _increases_ our trade deficits
[[link removed]].
Which Trump believes are already catastrophically high. But whatever,
not like Trump has a Wharton degree.

2
[[link removed]]
 The best headline, hands down, was from Scott Lincicome:
“Trump’s #XiToo Moment
[[link removed]].”

3
[[link removed]]
 “I would not want anyone to think the data have deteriorated to a
point where it’s difficult for us to understand the economy,”
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said in a June Senate hearing
[[link removed]]. “But the direction of
travel is concerning.”

_CATHERINE RAMPELL is economics editor at The xxxxxx and an anchor at
MS NOW (fmrly MSNBC). She specializes in econ, politics, public
policy, immigration. Previously at WaPo, NYT, CNN, PBS NewsHour._

_THE xxxxxx was founded to provide analysis and reporting in defense
of America’s liberal democracy._

_That’s it. That’s the mission._

_We publish written articles and newsletters. We create podcasts and
YouTube videos. We give political analysis from experts who have spent
their lives in the business._

_Some of what we do is behind a paywall. Most of what we do is not.
That’s because we are a mission-based organization first and a
business second._

_And you can’t help save democracy from behind a paywall._

_The xxxxxx is a reader-supported publication. Sign-up to receive
newsletters and support our work._

 

* Donald Trump
[[link removed]]
* facts
[[link removed]]
* data collection
[[link removed]]
* government
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]
Manage subscription
[[link removed]]
Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Bluesky [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]